| Revision as of 21:24, 6 January 2006 editIrreversibleKnowledge (talk | contribs)40 edits →Clinical and medical topics: added entry: Edward Smith (psychologist); dispute over whether official recognition is necessary for a person to make major scientific advancements← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:26, 6 January 2006 edit undoIrreversibleKnowledge (talk | contribs)40 editsm →Clinical and medical topicsNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ==Clinical and medical topics== | ==Clinical and medical topics== | ||
| * ] - If a person has made large and verifiable contributions to science and society, but they have uncertain identity, and have not necessarily gone through the official educational system, and have not been published in any major scientific journal, should they be mentioned in wikipedia, or should knowledge of the existence and contributions of such subtle-but-important people be suppressed? ] 21:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | * ] - If a person has made large and verifiable contributions to science and society, but they have uncertain identity, and have not necessarily gone through the official educational system, and have not been published in any major scientific journal, then should they be mentioned in wikipedia, or should knowledge of the existence and contributions of such subtle-but-important people be suppressed? ] 21:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * ] - Request for comments with regard to a variety of ] and ] related pages as to the appropriate content of the '''See also''' section. Multiple pages are involved - the disagreement centers on inclusion of a large number of links from one POV which often have little apparent bearing on the article at hand. 04:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | * ] - Request for comments with regard to a variety of ] and ] related pages as to the appropriate content of the '''See also''' section. Multiple pages are involved - the disagreement centers on inclusion of a large number of links from one POV which often have little apparent bearing on the article at hand. 04:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * ] - A device that "oxygenates" the body and supposedly heals a lot of things. Originally presented as fact. Claims and references were added, but the original editor keeps reverting them. 13:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | * ] - A device that "oxygenates" the body and supposedly heals a lot of things. Originally presented as fact. Claims and references were added, but the original editor keeps reverting them. 13:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:26, 6 January 2006
Shortcut- ]
Biology and related
- Shiloh Shepherd Dog - how breed registries should be included in the article 18:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Talk: Virago: Whether the term "virago" is a concept in anthropology. 23:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Female_Nobel_Prize_laureates — A dispute exists as to the neutrality of one section of this article.
Mathematics
- Mathematics RFC's should also be cross-posted and announced at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Mathematics
- Talk:Arabic numerals- Heated dispute over content changes and revisions with major parties not discussing the issue but just repeatedly reverting. Peyna 16:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- See also Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Roylee for a similar dispute. ---CH 01:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Clinical and medical topics
- Talk:Edward Smith (psychologist) - If a person has made large and verifiable contributions to science and society, but they have uncertain identity, and have not necessarily gone through the official educational system, and have not been published in any major scientific journal, then should they be mentioned in wikipedia, or should knowledge of the existence and contributions of such subtle-but-important people be suppressed? IrreversibleKnowledge 21:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Thimerosal - Request for comments with regard to a variety of vaccine and autism related pages as to the appropriate content of the See also section. Multiple pages are involved - the disagreement centers on inclusion of a large number of links from one POV which often have little apparent bearing on the article at hand. 04:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Chi Machine - A device that "oxygenates" the body and supposedly heals a lot of things. Originally presented as fact. Claims and references were added, but the original editor keeps reverting them. 13:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Condom - a user has repeatedly added information claiming that talc on condoms was linked to cancer, that condoms had known carcinogen benzene in them, that pores in condoms were larger than the "so-called HIV", etc.08:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Zombie - request for comments, a user believes "there is a realistic zombie threat that might happen". 18:43, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Natasha Demkina - — POV conflict between two editors, one of which appears to be a primary source on the topic. A second editor who appears to have a passive involvement in the topic has altered the content to denigrate the research and the researchers, as well as the credentials and validity of the primary source. I'm not familiar with the research or the participants, and hoping someone with more familiarity can shed some insight. 17:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:MMR vaccine - Should the external webpage whale.to be included on this and other vaccine-related pages? Prior discussion about the topic and summary included on this talk page. 19:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Penis - Discussion is ongoing about whether to remove one of the images of the glans penis from the page. One editor keeps removing it for what are clearly censorship/prurience issues. Other editors are responding — understandably — by restoring the picture because Misplaced Pages is not censored for the protection of minors. A third opinion is that the picture itself is inappropriate not because of a desire to censor, but because it is a poor photo, there are already other photos on the page that do a better job of illustrating the glans, and the number of photos on the page is making the layout of the page ugly. 15:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:E. Fuller Torrey — edit conflict between two people, one of whom is aligned with an anti-psychiatry advocacy group, over how to adequately portray Torrey and his work in psychiatry. Neutral eyes needed. 03:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- præpuce —A dispute exists at præpuce about whether the præpuce helps protect the protective properties against heat cold, mechanical, et cetera, to such structures as the glans, meatus, frænulum, its own inner smooth and ridge mucosa, et cetera. One side claims it does, while the other side claims that the præpuce is devoid of function. The discussion on the talkpage can be found here: Præpuce . This topic was entered into the RFC November 5, 2005
Physical science
- Physics RFC's should also be cross-posted and announced at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Physics
- Talk:Cold fusion – Edit conflict with several competing versions, one of which is a revert to the featured article version. Please have a look and help build a reasonable consensus version. Article looks like it will lose featured status (vote). ObsidianOrder 02:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Green Fireballs Please check on the neutrality and accuracy. 04:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:False Doppler – Long dispute about the validity of the term "false doppler". 14:52, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Telecommunications and digital technology
- Talk:Classic_NES_Series - Disagreement over two pieces of criticism. I left a note on ERW1980's talk page, to which he responded on my page, but since then nothing else has transpired. Hbdragon88 22:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Gnu/linux - Basically boils down to whether Gnu/linux should redirect to Linux or GNU/Linux_naming_debate. 00:20, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Blue screen of death#Foo Screen of Death merge - Should the various other Screens of Death be merged into Blue screen of death? 23:59, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ken Kutaragi - disageements about Sony Computer Entertinment losses, POV editions, Kutaragi be acused to be responsible of Sony Corp losses, POV about Sony board of directions changes, page protected today because a revert war just emerge. --Brazil4Linux 23:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- B4L is a POV pusher with a history of 3RR on this article. ALKIVAR™
13:45, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- B4L is a POV pusher with a history of 3RR on this article. ALKIVAR™
- Talk:Podcasting - should we have a link to http://www.how-to-podcast-tutorial.com/what-is-a-podcast.htm 05:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Technology and engineering
- Talk:Interstate_76_(east)#Back_to_the_routeboxint has an edit war about the infobox. The issue was taken to Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/29_12_2005_Interstate_76_(east) as well. Please respond on Talk:Interstate_76_(east)#. Thanks, SteveMc 03:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Depleted uranium which version best reflects Misplaced Pages policy, is more factual, and is NPOV Old Version or Revised Version03:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Unclassified
- Talk:Transcendental Meditation The issue is how to apply the Misplaced Pages:Verifiability policy in the case of pro or non-pro scientific studies or scientific affirmations about the transcendental meditation technique, including assertions on the scientific methods used. See also Rfc in Religion and philosophy 19:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)