| Revision as of 04:08, 5 February 2010 editExtransit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,062 edits →Ozzy Osbourne's 10th studio album: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:04, 22 February 2010 edit undoErwin85Bot (talk | contribs)62,731 edits New section: →[] nomination of []: Bot notification of AfDNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| Maybe salt it until there's actual proof it's coming? That's at least the third time it's been created. ]] 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | Maybe salt it until there's actual proof it's coming? That's at least the third time it's been created. ]] 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :I think I will hold off on that for now. Two of the deletion log entries just came from moving the page around and as the title has many possible alternatives I think the likelihood of recreation is relatively small. ] (]) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | :I think I will hold off on that for now. Two of the deletion log entries just came from moving the page around and as the title has many possible alternatives I think the likelihood of recreation is relatively small. ] (]) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:04, 22 February 2010
Community de-Adminship - finalization poll for the CDA proposal
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
- gather opinion on the 'consensus margin' (what percentages, if any, have the most support) and
- ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. Matt Lewis (talk) 01:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
172.129.120.152's block.
You may want to set it with talk page editing disabled..I've dealt with this vandal a number of times, he always rephrases/vandalises his own talk. Connormah (talk) 03:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are quite correct Connormah. I was kind of amused by it, that's why I have not so far. But, that's a pretty illegitimate excuse on my part, I know :D. Re-blocking now...
- Keep up the good vandal fighting work sir. Icewedge (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
You've got mail. The Thing Vandalize me 03:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- So I see. Its good to get mail :D. Expect a response shortly. Icewedge (talk) 02:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/JWASM
At 175 kilobytes, should Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/JWASM be included in User:Icewedge/Largest AFD's? Cunard (talk) 22:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Probably, I think the idea I had when I created the page was to list AFDs more than 150 kilobytes. Thanks for the spot! Icewedge (talk) 03:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem! I found out about this interesting list after you added Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Colorado balloon incident to it. Best, Cunard (talk) 03:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Ozzy Osbourne's 10th studio album
Maybe salt it until there's actual proof it's coming? That's at least the third time it's been created. HalfShadow 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think I will hold off on that for now. Two of the deletion log entries just came from moving the page around and as the title has many possible alternatives I think the likelihood of recreation is relatively small. Icewedge (talk) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Deletionpedia
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Deletionpedia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Deletionpedia (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)