Misplaced Pages

Forbidden relationships in Judaism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:18, 15 February 2010 editDebresser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors110,467 editsm Reverted edits by Newman Luke (talk) to last version by Mzk1← Previous edit Revision as of 11:21, 15 February 2010 edit undoNewman Luke (talk | contribs)3,500 editsm Exclusions from the assembly: these subsections are a bit too small for the subdivision to be necessaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Forbidden relationships in Judaism''' (Hebrew עריות Arayot, or איסורי ביאה Isurey bi'ah) are those intimate relationships which are forbidden per the various prohibitions in the ] and subsequent ] injunctions. Engaging in some forbidden relationships is considered such a serious sin in Jewish law that unlike most other ], in which one is allowed to transgress the commandment when a life is on the line, engaging in a forbidden relationship is forbidden, even when the alternative is death.<ref name = "mitzvot324">{{Harvnb|Eisenberg|2005|p=324.}}</ref> '''Forbidden relationships in Judaism''' (Hebrew עריות Arayot, or איסורי ביאה Isurey bi'ah) are those intimate relationships which are forbidden per the various prohibitions in the ], as interpreted by ], or by ], together with a number of other subsequent injunctions. Engaging in some forbidden relationships is considered such a serious sin in Jewish law that that one should be willing to die, rather than commit them<ref name = "mitzvot324">{{Harvnb|Eisenberg|2005|p=324.}}</ref>; the Talmud argues that most other ]s are ], in order to obey them<ref>'']'', 74a</ref>


== With married women == == Animals ==


] is prohibited by the ] of the ]<ref name="Ex2219">{{bibleverse||Exodus|22:19|}}</ref>, and by the ] of ]<ref>{{bibleverse||Leviticus|18:23|}}</ref><ref name="Lev2015">{{bibleverse||Leviticus|20:15|}}</ref><ref name="Lev2016">{{bibleverse||Leviticus|20:16|}}</ref>; the prohibition occurs in two distinct parts of the latter, both of which emphasise that bestiality is prohibited both for men<ref name="Lev2015" /> and for women<ref name="Lev2016" />.
* ] is forbidden (Lev. 18:20).

* A man is not allowed to have sexual relations with his wife - or any other woman - during the time of her ] (Lev. 18:19), until after she undergoes the proper cleansing procedures in a ].
The Covenant Code sets the ] as the punishment for the crime<ref name="Ex2219" />. The second time the Holiness Code forbids bestiality, it goes further than the Covenant Code, insisting that not just the human perpetrators, but also the animal participants, should be killed if bestiality is committed<ref name="Lev2015" /><ref name="Lev2016" />; according to the Talmud, the purpose of also killing the animals involved was to obliterate all physical memory of the crime<ref>{{ISBE|article=crimes}}</ref>.


== Exogamy == == Exogamy ==
{{main|Interfaith marriage in Judaism}} {{main|Interfaith marriage in Judaism}}


] is forbidden in Judaism. In relation to intermarriage with a ] the prohibition is biblical,<ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis|24:2-4|}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis||26:34-35|}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Deuteronomy|7:3|}}</ref>, while marriage with other nationalities is forbidden by the Talmudic sages.<ref>Kiddushin 68b</ref> Two special classes of people in Israelite society - ] and ] - were regarded as ''foreigners'' in relation to this rule, and hence the Talmud forbids marriage to them.<ref>] 4:4</ref> The Biblical position on ] is somewhat unspecified, except in relation to intermarriage with a ], which the majority of the ] are depicted as criticising<ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis|24:2-4|}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis||26:34-35|}}</ref>. This attitude is formalised in the ], which forbids intermarriage with Canaanites<ref>{{bibleverse||Deuteronomy|7:3|}}</ref>. Marriage with other nationalities is forbidden by the Talmudic sages<ref>Kiddushin 68b</ref>. Two special classes of people in Israelite society - ] and ] - were regarded as ''foreigners'' in relation to this rule, and hence the Talmud forbids marriage to them.<ref>] 4:4</ref>.

However, intermarriage to non-Canaanites clearly occurs on several occasions in the ], and early parts of the ], without direct criticism; for example, ] is described as marrying the daughter of the king of ]<ref>{{bibleverse|2|Samuel|3:3|}}</ref>, and ] as having married ]<ref>{{bibleverse|2|Samuel|11:3|}}</ref>. The Talmud accounts for this, on the basis that marriage between a Jew and a convert to Judaism was not regarded as intermarriage<ref>Berakhot 28a</ref><ref>Kiddushin 5:4 (Tosefta)</ref>. Hence, all the Biblical passages which appear to support intermarriages, such as that of ] to ], and that of ], were regarded by the classical rabbis as having occurred only after the foreign spouse had converted to Judaism<ref>Genesis Rabbah, 65</ref>.

The situation is slightly complicated by the fact that the Talmudic writers viewed ] as being at the ''gate'' of Judaism<ref>], ''Responsa'', No. 119</ref>, and hence marriages between Christians and Jews were not seen by them as prohibited<ref name="JewEncInter">{{Jewish Encyclopedia|article=Intermarriage|url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?letter=I&artid=163}}</ref>. Nevertheless, in 1236 ] tried to break up such marriages<ref>Moses of Coucy, ''Sefer Mitzvot ha-Gadol'', 112</ref>


==Incest== ==Incest==
{{main|Jewish views of incest|Incest}} {{main|Jewish views of incest|Incest}}


As with most religions, ] is forbidden by Jewish religious law. However, the exact definition of incest does not necessarily correspond to the laws which western nations have against incest; in particular, they are not based on degree of relation. The ] outlines the categories of kinship which constitute "incest" according to Jewish religious law. As literally stated in Leviticus, they are: As with most religions, ] is forbidden by Jewish religious law. However, the exact definition of incest does not necessarily correspond to the laws which western nations have against incest; in particular, they are not based on degree of relation. The ] outlines the categories of kinship which constitute "incest" according to Jewish religious law. As literally stated in Leviticus, they are:
* One's ] (Lev. 18:7) * One's ] (Lev. 18:7)
* One's ] (Lev. 18:7) * One's ] (Lev. 18:7)
* One's ] (Lev. 18:8) * One's ] (Lev. 18:8)
* One's paternal or maternal ] (Lev. 18:9) * One's paternal or maternal ] (Lev. 18:9)
* One's paternal sister through one's father's wife (Lev. 18:11) * One's paternal sister through one's father's wife (Lev. 18:11)
* One's ] (inferred from Lev. 18:10) * One's ] (inferred from Lev. 18:10)
* One's ] (Lev. 18:10) * One's ] (Lev. 18:10)
* ] (Lev. 18:17) * ] (Lev. 18:17)
* A woman and her ] (Lev. 18:17) * A woman and her ] (Lev. 18:17)
* One's ] by blood (Lev. 18:12-13) * One's ] by blood (Lev. 18:13)
* One's ] (Lev. 18:14) * One's ] (Lev. 18:14)
* One's ] (Lev. 18:14) * One's ] (Lev. 18:14)
Line 32: Line 37:


=== Rabbinically prohibited relationships === === Rabbinically prohibited relationships ===

In addition to the relationships biblically prohibited to Jews, rabbis have gone further to prohibit certain additional relationships with various blood relatives and in-laws. These are called "Shni'ot" (secondary prohibitions). Some of these are:<ref name="mitzvot324"/> In addition to the relationships biblically prohibited to Jews, rabbis have gone further to prohibit certain additional relationships with various blood relatives and in-laws.<ref name="mitzvot324"/>. These additional relationships were termed ''seconds'' (Hebrew: ''sheniyyot''), and included:
* One's ] * One's ]
* One's ] * One's ]
Line 41: Line 47:
== Exclusions from the assembly == == Exclusions from the assembly ==


The Bible prohibits men from taking part in the ''] of ]'' if they are members of certain categories of people. Jewish tradition considers this to be solely a limitation on marriage. The Bible prohibits men from taking part in the ''] of ]'' if they are members of certain categories of people. Jewish tradition considers this to be solely a limitation on marriage.


=== Groups ===
Jewish people are prohibited from marrying with the following groups: Jewish people are prohibited from marrying with the following groups:
* Male ] and ] converts (Deut. 23:4) * Male ] and ] converts (Deut. 23:4)
Line 51: Line 56:
As the people currently living in those areas may not be be descended from the original peoples, these three prohibitions do not apply today.<ref>Rabbi ], ], III:4:10 and commentaries, Habahir edition, Leshem publishers</ref> As the people currently living in those areas may not be be descended from the original peoples, these three prohibitions do not apply today.<ref>Rabbi ], ], III:4:10 and commentaries, Habahir edition, Leshem publishers</ref>


The Talmud forbids marriage to a '']''.<ref>Yebamot, 4:13</ref> This includes children resulting from an incestuous marriage, and children resulting from ],<ref name="JELaws" /> but does not include the children of two unmarried people, who are not related to each other.<ref name="JELaws" /> A convert may marry a mamzer, but the children are still mamzerim.<ref>], ], Sanctity, Laws of Sexual Prohibitions, 15:7-8</ref>
=== Bastards ===
{{main|Mamzer}}


The Talmud forbids marriage to a '']''.<ref>Yebamot, 4:13</ref> This includes children resulting from an incestuous marriage, and children resulting from ],<ref name="JELaws" /> but does not include the children of two unmarried people, who are not related to each other.<ref name="JELaws" /> A convert may marry a mamzer, but the children are still mamzerim.<ref>], ], Sanctity, Laws of Sexual Prohibitions, 15:7-8</ref>

=== Spadones ===
Jewish tradition also forbids marriage to a man who has been forcibly emasculated; the ] term '']'', which is used to refer to such people, is used in the ] to denote certain foreign political officials (resembling the meaning of '']'').<ref name="JELaws" /> The Jewish prohibition does not include men who were born without visible testicles (conditions including ]), or without a visible penis (conditions including ]).<ref name="JELaws" /> There is dispute, even in traditional Judaism, about whether this prohibited group of men should include those who have become, at some point since their birth, emasculated as the result of a disease.<ref>], ], 5</ref> Jewish tradition also forbids marriage to a man who has been forcibly emasculated; the ] term '']'', which is used to refer to such people, is used in the ] to denote certain foreign political officials (resembling the meaning of '']'').<ref name="JELaws" /> The Jewish prohibition does not include men who were born without visible testicles (conditions including ]), or without a visible penis (conditions including ]).<ref name="JELaws" /> There is dispute, even in traditional Judaism, about whether this prohibited group of men should include those who have become, at some point since their birth, emasculated as the result of a disease.<ref>], ], 5</ref>


== Special rules for priests == == Special rules for priests ==
] are not allowed to marry: According to the bible, ] are not allowed to marry:

* divorcees<ref name="JELaws" /> * divorcees<ref name="JELaws" />
* a ] (Lev. 21:7)
* ]<ref>{{bibleverse||Leviticus|21:17|}} (in the ], it is verse 14 instead)</ref>
* a woman who has had a forbidden sexual relationships (as with a married man or a Canaanite); such a woman is called a ] in the Torah) (Lev. 21:7) * a woman who was born of the prohibited relations of a kohen (called a ]) (Lev. 21:7)

* a woman who was born of the prohibited relations of a ] (called a ]) (Lev. 21:7)
The ] must also not marry a ] (Lev. 21:14). Sexual relations with a widow outside of marriage are also forbidden (Lev. 21:15). He is required to marry a virgin maiden (Lev. 21:13), and may not marry ]<ref>{{bibleverse||Leviticus|21:17|}} (in the ], it is verse 14 instead)</ref>. However, if he was married to such woman prior to becoming high priest, he may remain married to her.

The Talmudic writers also forbade marriage between a priest and:
* ]<ref>] 22a</ref><ref>Ketubot 27a</ref> * ]<ref>] 22a</ref><ref>Ketubot 27a</ref>
* a widow who's brother-in-law refused to perform a ] and she consequently performs the ] ceremony.<ref>Yebamot 24a</ref> * a widow who's brother-in-law refused to perform a ] and she consequently performs the ] ceremony.<ref>Yebamot 24a</ref>
* a woman who has had a forbidden sexual relationships (like with a married man or a Canaanite)

Although the first century destruction of the ] resulted in the priesthood being redundant, the Torah frequently portrays the Israelite priesthood as an hereditary position, and so the rabbis of the middle ages regarded these regulations as applying, still, to all men who claim to be descended from such priests; such claims can often be detected in modern surnames resembling the Hebrew word ''kohen'', the term used in most parts of the ] to mean ''priest'' (the ]s in related languages, however, mean '']''<ref>{{EncyclopaediaBiblica|article=Priest|section=Praetorium-Prophet_(False)}}</ref>).

== With married women ==


According to the ], and the ], ] is forbidden<ref>{{bibleverse||Leviticus|18:20|}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Leviticus|20:10|}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Deuteronomy|22:22|}}</ref>. In the ] of the ], it is required that a pregnant<ref>''Peake's commentary on the Bible'' ad loc</ref> woman suspected of adultery be subjected to the ], a form of ], if her husband had become fiercely ''jealous'' about the pregnancy (literally ''has the storm-wind of jealousy''), and there are not enough witnesses able to confirm the woman's guilt or innocence<ref>{{bibleverse||Numbers|5:11-31|}}</ref>.
Some of these prohibitions are biblical, and some are rabbinical.


Sexual intercourse with a ] woman is often regarded with disgust<ref name="PaulMenses">Paula Weideger, ''Menstruation and menopause : the physiology and psychology, the myth and the reality'', (1975), pages 126-127</ref>; the Torah is no different, as the Holiness Code twice prohibits it<ref>{{Bibleverse||Leviticus|18:19|}}</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse||Leviticus|20:18|}}</ref>. Israelite society is not the only culture with a formal prohibition against intercourse during menstruation; the ], for example, also strictly forbid it<ref>Beverly Strassmann, ''Predictors of fecundability and conception waits among the Dogon of Mali'' in ''American Journal of Physical Anthropology'' (1996), volume 105, pages 167-184</ref>.
The ] (high priest) must also not marry a ] (Lev. 21:14). Sexual relations with a widow outside of marriage are also forbidden (Lev. 21:15). He is required to marry a virgin maiden (Lev. 21:13). However, if he was married to a woman otherwise permitted to a kohen and was then elevated to the high priesthood, he may remain married to her.


== Homosexuality == == Homosexuality ==
{{Main|LGBT topics and Judaism}} {{Main|LGBT topics and Judaism}}


The Holiness Code of ] forbids certain activity involving two men together<ref>{{bibleverse||Leviticus|18:22|}}</ref>.
===Orthodox===


===Orthodox===
Orthodox Judaism intepretates Leviticus 18:22 as forbiding men from lying with other men in the manner in which they would with a woman. Leviticus 18:14 specifically prohibits such relationships with one's father or uncle.<ref>{{Harvnb|Eisenberg|2005|p=327.}}</ref>


Orthodox Judaism inteprets this regulation as forbiding men from lying with other men in the manner in which they would with a woman. Leviticus 18:14 specifically prohibits such relationships with one's father or uncle.<ref>{{Harvnb|Eisenberg|2005|p=327.}}</ref>
There are three reasons rabbis give for homosexuality being prohibited in Jewish law:<ref>{{Harvnb|Eisenberg|2005|p=325}}</ref>

There are three reasons Orthodox rabbis give for homosexuality being prohibited in Jewish law:<ref>{{Harvnb|Eisenberg|2005|p=325}}</ref>
# It is a defiance of gender anatomy, which is unlike God's intention of procreation and sexual activity # It is a defiance of gender anatomy, which is unlike God's intention of procreation and sexual activity
# The ] involved results in a vain emission of ] # The ] involved results in a vain emission of ]
# It may lead a man to abandon his family # It may lead a man to abandon his family

There is no explicit prohibition in the Torah against ]; however Jewish law prohibits it, under the category of "the activities of (ancient) Egypt (see Lev. 18:3)".<ref>Rabbi Joseph Karo, Shulchan Aruch, III:20:2</ref> However, it is not considered ], and does not prohibit the woman to a kohen.<ref>Beit Sh'muel, ad. loc. based on ]</ref>


===Reform=== ===Reform===


Reform Judaisim interpretates Leviticus 18:22 as forbidding men from using sex as a form of ownership over men. Reform Jewish authors have revisited the Leviticus text and ask why the text mentions that one should not lie with a man “as with a woman.” If it is to be assumed that the Torah does not waste words, the authors ask why the Torah includes this extra clause. Most Reform Jews suggest that since intercourse involved possession (one of the ways in which a man ‘acquired’ a wife was to have intercourse with her), similar to the Christian theology of using sex to 'consumate' a marriage, it was abhorrent that a man might acquire another man – it is not the act of homosexual intercourse itself which is abhorrent, but using this act to acquire another man and therefore confuse the gender boundary. <ref>http://www.reformjudaism.org.uk/a-to-z-of-reform-judaism/contemporary-issues/homosexuality.html</ref> Reform Judaisim interprets the regulation as forbidding men from using sex as a form of ownership over men. Reform Jewish authors have revisited the Leviticus text and ask why the text mentions that one should not lie with a man “as with a woman.” If it is to be assumed that the Torah does not waste words, the authors ask why the Torah includes this extra clause. Most Reform Jews suggest that since intercourse involved possession (one of the ways in which a man ‘acquired’ a wife was to have intercourse with her), similar to the Christian theology of using sex to 'consumate' a marriage, it was abhorrent that a man might acquire another man – it is not the act of homosexual intercourse itself which is abhorrent, but using this act to acquire another man and therefore confuse the gender boundary. <ref>http://www.reformjudaism.org.uk/a-to-z-of-reform-judaism/contemporary-issues/homosexuality.html</ref>


== Animals == == Lesbianism ==

Leviticus 18:23 specifically forbids both a man and a woman from engaging in ]. It is considered an ] according to the Torah.<ref name="mitzvot324"/>
In Orthodox Judaism, ] is prohibited, on the assumption that it falls under the category of "the activities of (ancient) Egypt (see Lev. 18:3)".<ref>Rabbi Joseph Karo, Shulchan Aruch, III:20:2</ref> However, it is not considered ], and does not prohibit the woman to a kohen.<ref>Beit Sh'muel, ad. loc. based on ]</ref>


== Age == == Age ==
{{main|Marriagable Age in Judaism}}
Rather than being seen as merely a literary device to quickly describe the populating of the earth, the biblical instruction to ''go forth and multiply''<ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis|1:28|}}</ref> was interpreted by the ] ]s to mean that it was the duty of every male Jew to marry as soon as possible<ref name="Maimonides212">], ''Minyan haMitzvot'', 212</ref>. Several ]ic rabbis urged that children should be married as soon as they had reached the average age of ], which was deemed to occur at 14 years of age<ref name="San76b">'']'' 76b</ref>; however, it was also strictly forbidden, by ], for parents to allow their children to marry before the children had reached this age<ref name="San76b" />. Despite the young threshold for marriage, marriages with a large age gap between the spouses (eg. between a young man and an old woman) were thoroughly opposed by the classical rabbis<ref>'']'' 44a</ref><ref>''Sanhedrin'' 76a</ref>


The average age of ] was deemed to occur at 14 years of age<ref name="San76b">'']'' 76b</ref>; it was strictly forbidden, by ], for parents to allow their boys to marry before reaching this age<ref name="San76b" />. Despite the young threshold for marriage, marriages with a large age gap between the spouses (eg. between a young man and an old woman) were thoroughly opposed by the classical rabbis<ref>'']'' 44a</ref><ref>''Sanhedrin'' 76a</ref>
The classical rabbis saw 18 as the ideal age to become married<ref>'']'' 5:24</ref>, and anyone unmarried after the age of twenty was said to have been cursed by God<ref>'']'' 29b</ref>; ] frequently tried to compel an individual to marry, if they had passed the age of twenty without marriage<ref name="JELaws">''Jewish Encyclopedia'', ''Marriage Laws''</ref>. Nevertheless, the classical rabbis viewed study of the ] as a valid reason for remaining unmarried, although they were only rarely willing to regard life-long celibacy favourably<ref>''Yebamot'' 63b</ref>. Since the classical rabbis viewed marriage as a duty deriving from the instruction to ''go forth and multiply''<ref name="Maimonides212" />, they also believed that the duty to marry ended once the husband had fathered both a son and a daughter<ref name="Yeb61a">''Yebamot'' 61a</ref>; despite this, they also argued that no man should live without a wife even after he has several children<ref name="Yeb61a" />.


=== Ability to give consent === === Ability to give consent ===
Children, however, were not regarded as old enough to make an informed decision, and so could not consent to marriage themselves<ref name="JELaws" />, although marriage to a female child was still permissable if her father consented, whether she agreed to it or not<ref name="JELaws" />; if the father was dead, such consent could be given by her mother, or her brothers, but in this latter case the girl could annul the marriage when she reached the "''standard''" age of puberty (12), if she wished<ref name="JELaws" />.


A girl younger than the age of majority could be compelled to marry against her will, although she also had the right to an subsequently annul the marriage. However, the Talmud did not allow the marriage to be annulled if it was the girl's first marriage, if it had been arranged by her father<ref>{{Jewish Encyclopedia|article=Majority|url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?letter=M&artid=91}}</ref>. If she exercised this right, it lead to a true annulment, not a divorce; a divorce document ('']'') was not necessary<ref>Yebamot 107a</ref>, and a girl who did this was not regarded by legal regulations as a divorcee, in relation to the marriage<ref name="Yeb108a">''Yebamot'' 108a</ref>.
The ], and ]s, were also regarded, by traditional Jewish law, as being unable to give their consent; indeed, marriage to such people was forbidden. However, the rabbis allowed deaf-mutes to marry each other.<ref name="JELaws" />

The ], and ]s, were also regarded, by traditional Jewish law, as being unable to give their consent; indeed, marriage to such people was completely forbidden. However, the rabbis allowed deaf-mutes to marry each other<ref name="JELaws" />.


== References == == References ==

Revision as of 11:21, 15 February 2010

Forbidden relationships in Judaism (Hebrew עריות Arayot, or איסורי ביאה Isurey bi'ah) are those intimate relationships which are forbidden per the various prohibitions in the Torah, as interpreted by Rabbinic Judaism, or by Karaite Judaism, together with a number of other subsequent injunctions. Engaging in some forbidden relationships is considered such a serious sin in Jewish law that that one should be willing to die, rather than commit them; the Talmud argues that most other biblical commandments are not so important that one need commit self-sacrifice, in order to obey them

Animals

Bestiality is prohibited by the Covenant Code of the Book of Exodus, and by the Holiness Code of Leviticus; the prohibition occurs in two distinct parts of the latter, both of which emphasise that bestiality is prohibited both for men and for women.

The Covenant Code sets the death penalty as the punishment for the crime. The second time the Holiness Code forbids bestiality, it goes further than the Covenant Code, insisting that not just the human perpetrators, but also the animal participants, should be killed if bestiality is committed; according to the Talmud, the purpose of also killing the animals involved was to obliterate all physical memory of the crime.

Exogamy

Main article: Interfaith marriage in Judaism

The Biblical position on exogamous marriage is somewhat unspecified, except in relation to intermarriage with a Canaanite, which the majority of the Israelite patriarchs are depicted as criticising. This attitude is formalised in the Deuteronomic Code, which forbids intermarriage with Canaanites. Marriage with other nationalities is forbidden by the Talmudic sages. Two special classes of people in Israelite society - Nethinim and Gibeonites - were regarded as foreigners in relation to this rule, and hence the Talmud forbids marriage to them..

However, intermarriage to non-Canaanites clearly occurs on several occasions in the Torah, and early parts of the Deuteronomic history, without direct criticism; for example, King David is described as marrying the daughter of the king of Geshur, and Bathsheba as having married Uriah the Hittite. The Talmud accounts for this, on the basis that marriage between a Jew and a convert to Judaism was not regarded as intermarriage. Hence, all the Biblical passages which appear to support intermarriages, such as that of Joseph to Asenath, and that of Ruth, were regarded by the classical rabbis as having occurred only after the foreign spouse had converted to Judaism.

The situation is slightly complicated by the fact that the Talmudic writers viewed Christianity as being at the gate of Judaism, and hence marriages between Christians and Jews were not seen by them as prohibited. Nevertheless, in 1236 Moses of Coucy tried to break up such marriages

Incest

Main articles: Jewish views of incest and Incest

As with most religions, incest is forbidden by Jewish religious law. However, the exact definition of incest does not necessarily correspond to the laws which western nations have against incest; in particular, they are not based on degree of relation. The Book of Leviticus outlines the categories of kinship which constitute "incest" according to Jewish religious law. As literally stated in Leviticus, they are:

Rabbinically prohibited relationships

In addition to the relationships biblically prohibited to Jews, rabbis have gone further to prohibit certain additional relationships with various blood relatives and in-laws.. These additional relationships were termed seconds (Hebrew: sheniyyot), and included:

Exclusions from the assembly

The Bible prohibits men from taking part in the qahal of Yahweh if they are members of certain categories of people. Jewish tradition considers this to be solely a limitation on marriage.

Jewish people are prohibited from marrying with the following groups:

  • Male Moabite and Ammonite converts (Deut. 23:4)
  • Egyptian converts up to the third generation (Deut. 23:8-9)
  • Edomite converts up to the third generation (Deut. 23:8-9)

As the people currently living in those areas may not be be descended from the original peoples, these three prohibitions do not apply today.

The Talmud forbids marriage to a mamzer. This includes children resulting from an incestuous marriage, and children resulting from adultery, but does not include the children of two unmarried people, who are not related to each other. A convert may marry a mamzer, but the children are still mamzerim.

Jewish tradition also forbids marriage to a man who has been forcibly emasculated; the Greek term spadones, which is used to refer to such people, is used in the Septuagint to denote certain foreign political officials (resembling the meaning of eunuch). The Jewish prohibition does not include men who were born without visible testicles (conditions including cryptorchidism), or without a visible penis (conditions including hermaphroditism). There is dispute, even in traditional Judaism, about whether this prohibited group of men should include those who have become, at some point since their birth, emasculated as the result of a disease.

Special rules for priests

According to the bible, Israelite priests are not allowed to marry:

  • divorcees
  • a zonah (Lev. 21:7)
  • a woman who was born of the prohibited relations of a kohen (called a chalalah) (Lev. 21:7)

The Kohen Gadol must also not marry a widow (Lev. 21:14). Sexual relations with a widow outside of marriage are also forbidden (Lev. 21:15). He is required to marry a virgin maiden (Lev. 21:13), and may not marry converts. However, if he was married to such woman prior to becoming high priest, he may remain married to her.

The Talmudic writers also forbade marriage between a priest and:

Although the first century destruction of the temple in Jerusalem resulted in the priesthood being redundant, the Torah frequently portrays the Israelite priesthood as an hereditary position, and so the rabbis of the middle ages regarded these regulations as applying, still, to all men who claim to be descended from such priests; such claims can often be detected in modern surnames resembling the Hebrew word kohen, the term used in most parts of the masoretic text to mean priest (the cognates in related languages, however, mean soothsayer).

With married women

According to the Holiness Code, and the Deuteronomic Code, Adultery is forbidden. In the Priestly Code of the Book of Numbers, it is required that a pregnant woman suspected of adultery be subjected to the Ordeal of Bitter Water, a form of trial by ordeal, if her husband had become fiercely jealous about the pregnancy (literally has the storm-wind of jealousy), and there are not enough witnesses able to confirm the woman's guilt or innocence.

Sexual intercourse with a menstruating woman is often regarded with disgust; the Torah is no different, as the Holiness Code twice prohibits it. Israelite society is not the only culture with a formal prohibition against intercourse during menstruation; the Dogon, for example, also strictly forbid it.

Homosexuality

Main article: LGBT topics and Judaism

The Holiness Code of Leviticus forbids certain activity involving two men together.

Orthodox

Orthodox Judaism inteprets this regulation as forbiding men from lying with other men in the manner in which they would with a woman. Leviticus 18:14 specifically prohibits such relationships with one's father or uncle.

There are three reasons Orthodox rabbis give for homosexuality being prohibited in Jewish law:

  1. It is a defiance of gender anatomy, which is unlike God's intention of procreation and sexual activity
  2. The sexual arousal involved results in a vain emission of semen
  3. It may lead a man to abandon his family

Reform

Reform Judaisim interprets the regulation as forbidding men from using sex as a form of ownership over men. Reform Jewish authors have revisited the Leviticus text and ask why the text mentions that one should not lie with a man “as with a woman.” If it is to be assumed that the Torah does not waste words, the authors ask why the Torah includes this extra clause. Most Reform Jews suggest that since intercourse involved possession (one of the ways in which a man ‘acquired’ a wife was to have intercourse with her), similar to the Christian theology of using sex to 'consumate' a marriage, it was abhorrent that a man might acquire another man – it is not the act of homosexual intercourse itself which is abhorrent, but using this act to acquire another man and therefore confuse the gender boundary.

Lesbianism

In Orthodox Judaism, lesbianism is prohibited, on the assumption that it falls under the category of "the activities of (ancient) Egypt (see Lev. 18:3)". However, it is not considered adultery, and does not prohibit the woman to a kohen.

Age

Main article: Marriagable Age in Judaism

The average age of puberty was deemed to occur at 14 years of age; it was strictly forbidden, by classical rabbinical literature, for parents to allow their boys to marry before reaching this age. Despite the young threshold for marriage, marriages with a large age gap between the spouses (eg. between a young man and an old woman) were thoroughly opposed by the classical rabbis

Ability to give consent

A girl younger than the age of majority could be compelled to marry against her will, although she also had the right to an subsequently annul the marriage. However, the Talmud did not allow the marriage to be annulled if it was the girl's first marriage, if it had been arranged by her father. If she exercised this right, it lead to a true annulment, not a divorce; a divorce document (get) was not necessary, and a girl who did this was not regarded by legal regulations as a divorcee, in relation to the marriage.

The mentally handicapped, and deaf-mutes, were also regarded, by traditional Jewish law, as being unable to give their consent; indeed, marriage to such people was completely forbidden. However, the rabbis allowed deaf-mutes to marry each other.

References

  1. ^ Eisenberg 2005, p. 324.
  2. Sanhedrin, 74a
  3. ^ Exodus 22:19
  4. Leviticus 18:23
  5. ^ Leviticus 20:15
  6. ^ Leviticus 20:16
  7. This article incorporates text from the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia article "crimes", a publication now in the public domain.
  8. Genesis 24:2–4
  9. Genesis
  10. Deuteronomy 7:3
  11. Kiddushin 68b
  12. Yadayim 4:4
  13. 2 Samuel 3:3
  14. 2 Samuel 11:3
  15. Berakhot 28a
  16. Kiddushin 5:4 (Tosefta)
  17. Genesis Rabbah, 65
  18. Isaac ben Sheshet, Responsa, No. 119
  19.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainSinger, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Intermarriage". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
  20. Moses of Coucy, Sefer Mitzvot ha-Gadol, 112
  21. Rabbi Joseph Karo, Shulchan Aruch, III:4:10 and commentaries, Habahir edition, Leshem publishers
  22. Yebamot, 4:13
  23. ^ Cite error: The named reference JELaws was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. Maimonidies, Mishneh Torah, Sanctity, Laws of Sexual Prohibitions, 15:7-8
  25. Jacob ben Asher, Eben ha-'Ezer, 5
  26. Leviticus 21:17 (in the King James Version, it is verse 14 instead)
  27. Ketubot 22a
  28. Ketubot 27a
  29. Yebamot 24a
  30. This article incorporates text from the 1903 Encyclopaedia Biblica article "Priest", a publication now in the public domain.
  31. Leviticus 18:20
  32. Leviticus 20:10
  33. Deuteronomy 22:22
  34. Peake's commentary on the Bible ad loc
  35. Numbers 5:11–31
  36. Paula Weideger, Menstruation and menopause : the physiology and psychology, the myth and the reality, (1975), pages 126-127
  37. Leviticus 18:19
  38. Leviticus 20:18
  39. Beverly Strassmann, Predictors of fecundability and conception waits among the Dogon of Mali in American Journal of Physical Anthropology (1996), volume 105, pages 167-184
  40. Leviticus 18:22
  41. Eisenberg 2005, p. 327.
  42. Eisenberg 2005, p. 325
  43. http://www.reformjudaism.org.uk/a-to-z-of-reform-judaism/contemporary-issues/homosexuality.html
  44. Rabbi Joseph Karo, Shulchan Aruch, III:20:2
  45. Beit Sh'muel, ad. loc. based on Maimonidies
  46. ^ Sanhedrin 76b
  47. Yebamot 44a
  48. Sanhedrin 76a
  49.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainSinger, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Majority". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
  50. Yebamot 107a
  51. Yebamot 108a
Halakha (Jewish religious law)
Ethics
Ritual purity
Modesty
Agrarian laws
Halakhic principles
Punishment
Related boxes
Category: