Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:30, 18 February 2010

Hi

Hope to see you back soon! Verbal chat 22:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Kary Mullis

Maybe the guy has said somewhere that 'the human factor is baloney', but he hasn't done so in the source provided to back up the text (sourced to a video with sidebar of text). I watched it twice now, he doesn't mention the A in AGW at all in that video, yes, he says (as much as) 'global warming theory is wrong', but he doesn't mention the human factor in that source. Please revert your revert of me, or if I have missed it again, provide a timestamp. Thanks.86.3.142.2 (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

It's difficult to tell who you are with all of the IP-hopping. Please use your old account or create a new one. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

"with all the ip hopping" ??? LMFAO - two IPs are sooooooooooooo difficult to deal with eh? You are now just obfuscating your deceitful editing. The repeated insertion of false information is considered vandalism, don't put that lie back in again. Thanks.163.1.147.64 (talk) 07:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

It isn't vandalism. It's edit warring and should stop. Please use the talk page. Gerardw (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikiquette alerts discussion with which you may have been involved.

Hello, Keepcalmandcarryon This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ward20 (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Good enough

Sometimes you just have to go for good enough WP:GEPOV. Gerardw (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Kary Mullis

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Kary Mullis, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.

In particular, please beware of edit warring on probation pages. -- TS 18:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Mikovits Bartender Quote

I have raised a BLPN issue on this point. -- TerryE (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Whittemore Peterson Institute

Re , perhaps you can explain which specific bullet in WP:TPO supports this statement. Thank-you. -- TerryE (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Relevance and harmful. Your verbose and repetitive attacks on me, including comparisons with other editors, have no place on a talk page as they are irrelevant and serve no purpose other than to attack. That said, I consider this a borderline case, and I prefer to leave your comments in place.

Of course, I have also commented on you. Did my comments violate these points? I think not. In contrast with my edit history, yours indicates that, at least since the WPI Science publication, you appear to have a single mission on Misplaced Pages: to promote the Whittemore Peterson Institute (or its findings) at the expense of information from reliable sources. Furthermore, your participation in internet "ME" activism off Misplaced Pages demonstrates a potential bias. In my opinion, it was relevant to mention this on the talk page. In addition, you have engaged in off-Misplaced Pages communication with me and other editors of the page, and you have referred to other active editors as an "inner circle" of CFS advocates. This was also relevant. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)