Misplaced Pages

User talk:Saiga12: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:19, 17 February 2010 editHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 edits →Last warning← Previous edit Revision as of 22:19, 17 February 2010 edit undoSaiga12 (talk | contribs)215 edits →Last warningNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
:And now pls try to tell me that this source provides reliable numbers, mhm sure USA lost on one day 7 tanks !--Saiga 19:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC) :And now pls try to tell me that this source provides reliable numbers, mhm sure USA lost on one day 7 tanks !--Saiga 19:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


*Just in case that you do not understand, there are two problems with your edits. ''First'', the diffs provided by me above include insertions of garbage like ''' begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0-670-88695-5 end_of_the_skype_highlighting''' in WP articles. ''Second'', you forged the numbers in all examples above. ''This is not about reliability of sources''. If a source tells a number (say "345"), you should quote this number if you make a reference to this source. Do you agree?] (]) 21:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC) *Just in case that you do not understand, there are two problems with your edits. ''First'', the diffs provided by me above include insertions of garbage like ''' end_of_the_skype_highlighting''' in WP articles. ''Second'', you forged the numbers in all examples above. ''This is not about reliability of sources''. If a source tells a number (say "345"), you should quote this number if you make a reference to this source. Do you agree?] (]) 21:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


*Sure I get the point. Oh F*** now i get it, i inadvertently insert this crap to the Ukraine article !!!
My apologize for this!
Yes sure i should quote this number but not in the header of the article and also write that this source is not reliable and contains propaganda.
If we only look at the American Wars we will never find in Wiki things like this.
Like Sadam claimed that he killed in DesertStorm several hundreds of coalition force soldiers and the casualties of his forces were only 30 men.
That's crap like all the article figures on KavkazCenter.

Revision as of 22:19, 17 February 2010

Welcome

Feel free to contribute to my discussion page.

Deletion of RFP requests

I don't know what you were trying to accomplish with this, but please don't do it again. --Sable232 (talk) 02:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry for this! But that were my request I only modify it. Anyway SORRY--Saiga12 (talk) 02:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Last warning

But you continue vandalizing at least four different articles even after your apology: , ,, . Please revert yourself in all these articles and stop doing this, or you may be indefinitely blocked from editing. Biophys (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

First of all i correct the articles and not VANDALIZING at them. The articles provided sources from "Terrorist websites" this sources are not reliable in anyway. Secondly i will post source from western annalists who also provide this figures. For the moment i will post "No reliable information".
You can also look at the Russian articles, they also provide NO numbers about the terrorist casualties.
Moreover the article about Battle of Height 776 was modified and the unreliable source "KavkazCenter" and any claims of it were deleted.
A short quote of an article from KavkazCenter:

"At least 3 US invaders were killed and another 3 injured during gun battles in which the enemy coalition forces were forced to retreat, said the report, adding a bomb tore :apart a US invaders tank while trying to flee from the certain areas, killing the US invaders who were on board."
Or
In another attack in Safun and Wakil Wazir areas, Mujahideen destroyed 7 tanks of the enemy and killed 25 invaders.
http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/02/16/11436.shtml


And now pls try to tell me that this source provides reliable numbers, mhm sure USA lost on one day 7 tanks !--Saiga 19:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Just in case that you do not understand, there are two problems with your edits. First, the diffs provided by me above include insertions of garbage like end_of_the_skype_highlighting in WP articles. Second, you forged the numbers in all examples above. This is not about reliability of sources. If a source tells a number (say "345"), you should quote this number if you make a reference to this source. Do you agree?Biophys (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


  • Sure I get the point. Oh F*** now i get it, i inadvertently insert this crap to the Ukraine article !!!

My apologize for this! Yes sure i should quote this number but not in the header of the article and also write that this source is not reliable and contains propaganda. If we only look at the American Wars we will never find in Wiki things like this. Like Sadam claimed that he killed in DesertStorm several hundreds of coalition force soldiers and the casualties of his forces were only 30 men. That's crap like all the article figures on KavkazCenter.