| Revision as of 22:20, 17 February 2010 editSaiga12 (talk | contribs)215 edits →Last warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:21, 17 February 2010 edit undoSaiga12 (talk | contribs)215 edits →Last warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| :If we only look at the American Wars we will never find in Wiki things like this. | :If we only look at the American Wars we will never find in Wiki things like this. | ||
| :Like, Sadam claimed that he killed in DesertStorm several hundreds of coalition force soldiers and the casualties of his forces were only 30 men. | :Like, Sadam claimed that he killed in DesertStorm several hundreds of coalition force soldiers and the casualties of his forces were only 30 men. | ||
| :That's crap like all the article figures on KavkazCenter. | :That's crap like all the article and figures on KavkazCenter. | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 17 February 2010
Welcome
Feel free to contribute to my discussion page.
Deletion of RFP requests
I don't know what you were trying to accomplish with this, but please don't do it again. --Sable232 (talk) 02:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am sorry for this! But that were my request I only modify it. Anyway SORRY--Saiga12 (talk) 02:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Last warning
But you continue vandalizing at least four different articles even after your apology: , ,, . Please revert yourself in all these articles and stop doing this, or you may be indefinitely blocked from editing. Biophys (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- First of all i correct the articles and not VANDALIZING at them. The articles provided sources from "Terrorist websites" this sources are not reliable in anyway. Secondly i will post source from western annalists who also provide this figures. For the moment i will post "No reliable information".
- You can also look at the Russian articles, they also provide NO numbers about the terrorist casualties.
- Moreover the article about Battle of Height 776 was modified and the unreliable source "KavkazCenter" and any claims of it were deleted.
- A short quote of an article from KavkazCenter:
- "At least 3 US invaders were killed and another 3 injured during gun battles in which the enemy coalition forces were forced to retreat, said the report, adding a bomb tore :apart a US invaders tank while trying to flee from the certain areas, killing the US invaders who were on board."
- Or
- In another attack in Safun and Wakil Wazir areas, Mujahideen destroyed 7 tanks of the enemy and killed 25 invaders.
- http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/02/16/11436.shtml
- And now pls try to tell me that this source provides reliable numbers, mhm sure USA lost on one day 7 tanks !--Saiga 19:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just in case that you do not understand, there are two problems with your edits. First, the diffs provided by me above include insertions of garbage like end_of_the_skype_highlighting in WP articles. Second, you forged the numbers in all examples above. This is not about reliability of sources. If a source tells a number (say "345"), you should quote this number if you make a reference to this source. Do you agree?Biophys (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sure I get the point. Oh F*** now i get it, i inadvertently insert this crap to the Ukraine article !!!
- My apologize for this!
- Yes sure i should quote this number but not in the header of the article and also write that this source is not reliable and contains propaganda.
- If we only look at the American Wars we will never find in Wiki things like this.
- Like, Sadam claimed that he killed in DesertStorm several hundreds of coalition force soldiers and the casualties of his forces were only 30 men.
- That's crap like all the article and figures on KavkazCenter.