| Revision as of 13:46, 18 February 2010 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Department of Redundancy Department/Archive 1.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:15, 23 February 2010 edit undoNefariousski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,614 edits →Block of user 76.165.219.34: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| He's still going -> ]. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | He's still going -> ]. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Block of user 76.165.219.34 == | |||
| I was looking into contribs and it doesn't seem like a single constructive edit has been made using this IP. After the last block expired the vandalism started up again almost immediately. While I'm not going to question your judgement regarding issuing a one week block and I do understand the policy regarding educational / IP etc... accounts might I suggest at least considering a longer block period if the vandalism starts up directly after the current block expiry? ] (]) 00:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:15, 23 February 2010
User:Department of Redundancy Department/templates/User talk
 Archives | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
User:Nks1
Yep i see ...looks like self promotion...I will comment/help no further.. (But will direct him here if he pms me or ask what to do now!!) ...Buzzzsherman (talk) 12:36 pm, Today (UTC−6)
- FYI: Their other userpage was deleted 3 times by myself and two other admins per WP:CSD#G11 because it contained the same material. Thanks for trying to help, though! —DoRD (?) (talk) 12:44 pm, Today (UTC−6)
GFDL and Misplaced Pages
Hi DoRD. I noticed that you recently removed a copyvio tag from the Pencubitt House article because the content was released under the GFDL license. However, GFDL-only text can no longer be used on Misplaced Pages since the switch to dual licensing on June 16, 2009 (see Misplaced Pages:Licensing update). Just thought I'd let you know. :) Regards, Theleftorium 23:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it's all so confusing. I won't be declining any G12 speedy tags unless they are obviously wrong from now on. Cheers —DoRD (?) (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
What abs positioning can i use?
What abs positioning can i use then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OmniWikia (talk • contribs) 21:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- I don't have a clue, but you might try asking about it at Village pump (technical). —DoRD (?) (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'll also add that repeatedly tripping the edit filter can get you blocked. —DoRD (?) (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Debra Medina (politician)
The category that I added had been properly sourced when I added it, however the content related to the category had been removed along with the references. I have since added the category back along with an additional ref. to illustrate that the category is appropriate. --Tdl1060 (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that she's what I'd call a conspiracy theorist, but at least it is sourced now. —DoRD (?) (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- And now that she has flatly denied being a truther, I have again removed that cat. —DoRD (?) (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
DoktorSpin
He's still going -> Talk:Open Watcom Assembler. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 22:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Block of user 76.165.219.34
I was looking into contribs and it doesn't seem like a single constructive edit has been made using this IP. After the last block expired the vandalism started up again almost immediately. While I'm not going to question your judgement regarding issuing a one week block and I do understand the policy regarding educational / IP etc... accounts might I suggest at least considering a longer block period if the vandalism starts up directly after the current block expiry? Nefariousski (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)