| Revision as of 23:36, 10 January 2006 edit68.159.20.189 (talk) comment to Urthogie, the Latino-hater← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:47, 11 January 2006 edit undoUrthogie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,196 edits :)Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ==link vandalism== | ==link vandalism== | ||
| To make a weak (and ineffective) claim that you can't link to a gallery is one thing, to remove links that provide resources directly related to the wiki subject (articles, links, interviews) is downright childish and inarguably constitutes vandalism. The sites are relevant ant the two most authoritative on the subject of Latin Rap, the links aren't going anywhere. And save the threats on sprotects, when your account is brand new and you yourself can't even edit the page anymore (You had to beg someone else to do it). | To make a weak (and ineffective) claim that you can't link to a gallery is one thing, to remove links that provide resources directly related to the wiki subject (articles, links, interviews) is downright childish and inarguably constitutes vandalism. The sites are relevant ant the two most authoritative on the subject of Latin Rap, the links aren't going anywhere. And save the threats on sprotects, when your account is brand new and you yourself can't even edit the page anymore (You had to beg someone else to do it). | ||
| :According to the rules of wikipedia, being relevant isn't the only requirement. You can't just randomly include a related link. Also, them being the most authoritative is subjective. You called me a latino hater, thats whats childish. I had to ask someone else to sprotect it, yes-- but once its sprotected only new users and spamming anons like yourself can't edit it :)--] 07:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Read ], you'll see that what you're doing is not allowed. Do it again and you'll be blocked for a certain period of time.--] 07:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:47, 11 January 2006
ok now about reggaeton. its true that there is many talented artist out there trying to make there way through that barrier. but it also radio station's fault for now reconizing good music. i tell you man reggaeton is blowing up. And we have artist like tego calderon, daddy yankee and don omar leading the way. but we also need the radio's help. like for example the radio station in new york 97.9. they claim that they play plenty of reggaeton. its not really true, because when they do play reggaeton during the day its like 3 or 4 songs and its the same songs everyday. only some times on the weekend they play some real reggaeton. but my point is we need some one to step up and help these artist. we have that channel "mun2" they play some reggaeton but they play one of the oldest video or they just play the same one over and over. but right now im just gonna relax and wait for reggaeton to appear on some english radio stations. because i know for a fact reggaeton is gonna be all ova the u.s. in a couple of years. reggaeton will big so bigger than hip-hop right now. so lets just watch the count down.........
I just reverted these edits because they were a copy & paste from . Dear 63.186.49.177, if you had permission to insert this copyrighted text here, then please state this explicitly. But even if you had, I think the text would have needed reworking and merging with the existing text. Don't get me wrong, it's a fine website with lots of information. I will add a link to it. regards, High on a tree 11:45, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
link vandalism
To make a weak (and ineffective) claim that you can't link to a gallery is one thing, to remove links that provide resources directly related to the wiki subject (articles, links, interviews) is downright childish and inarguably constitutes vandalism. The sites are relevant ant the two most authoritative on the subject of Latin Rap, the links aren't going anywhere. And save the threats on sprotects, when your account is brand new and you yourself can't even edit the page anymore (You had to beg someone else to do it).
- According to the rules of wikipedia, being relevant isn't the only requirement. You can't just randomly include a related link. Also, them being the most authoritative is subjective. You called me a latino hater, thats whats childish. I had to ask someone else to sprotect it, yes-- but once its sprotected only new users and spamming anons like yourself can't edit it :)--Urthogie 07:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Read Misplaced Pages:External Links, you'll see that what you're doing is not allowed. Do it again and you'll be blocked for a certain period of time.--Urthogie 07:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)