| Revision as of 05:17, 7 May 2004 editNikola Smolenski (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users13,046 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:28, 7 May 2004 edit undoCecropia (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators12,718 edits =George H.W. Bush=Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| : Quick gives: , , , , ... I guess that WC archives don't go back to 1986. ] 05:17, 7 May 2004 (UTC) | : Quick gives: , , , , ... I guess that WC archives don't go back to 1986. ] 05:17, 7 May 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ::I've done a lot of research in my life and have discovered that all you need is one bad citation that is then picked up over and over, especially by partisans, which describes the sources you're giving, some of which don't even mention the alleged incident and none giving a primary source. If six people repeat a lie it doesn't make it less a lie. The point is I went to the primary source, and it just isn't there. -- ] 05:28, 7 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :Original cite came from the now-banned ]. ] 04:38, 6 May 2004 (UTC) | :Original cite came from the now-banned ]. ] 04:38, 6 May 2004 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:28, 7 May 2004
Any objection to moving this to war-crime? Lirath Q. Pynnor
I have no preference between "war crime" and "war-crime" as a title, but if you move it, be sure to change all the links in pages on "What links here". -- Infrogmation 05:34, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
I have a definite preference. "war crime" is a noun, "war-crime" a modifier, as in "war-crime tribunal". 142.177.22.22 20:32, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
George H.W. Bush
"Condemnation" is not charging. We're talking about people who've actually gone to trial here. Meelar 06:14, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
You're going to need a better source than an off-handed comment by Chomsky to place someone in a shortlist of of war criminals. I can't find a primary source for this or even a decent secondary source. The International Court of Justice (World Court) does not list any case whatever involving the U.S. and Panama and a search of their site does not even mention Bush's name. Further, even if there were a case (which there isn't) the WC decides complaints between nations, it doesn't try individuals. Cecropia 04:36, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
- Quick Google search gives: , , , , ... I guess that WC archives don't go back to 1986. Nikola 05:17, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
- I've done a lot of research in my life and have discovered that all you need is one bad citation that is then picked up over and over, especially by partisans, which describes the sources you're giving, some of which don't even mention the alleged incident and none giving a primary source. If six people repeat a lie it doesn't make it less a lie. The point is I went to the primary source, and it just isn't there. -- Cecropia 05:28, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
- Original cite came from the now-banned User:Troll Silent, Troll Deep. Meelar 04:38, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
- ? I can't see him ever editing the article? Nikola 05:17, 7 May 2004 (UTC)