Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:28, 8 March 2010

 Friday · December 27, 2024 · 05:05 · 119,004 · 848 · Last modified by Turian (talk · contribs)

24 December 2024
News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform" Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting? Recent research: "Misplaced Pages editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Misplaced Pages article intensifies Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols Traffic report: Was a long and dark December
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Links Main pages User page Talk page Archive Discussion Policy discussion Reference Links Policy Definitions Sources By Topic A-F G-M N-Z Images 9/11 Truth movement

Info

Cs32en (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) This user has been on the English Misplaced Pages for 15 years, 8 months and 18 days. This user has been on the German Misplaced Pages for 18 years, 5 months and 26 days. <11,000 This user has made fewer than 11,000 edits. This user may have a strong personal viewpoint on some issues, but strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on encyclopedic content about controversial topics. This user, as a general rule, will ignore questions about their real life. en-3 This user can contribute with an advanced level of English. fr-3 Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau avancé de français. de Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache. This user is a participant in WikiProject Japan. This user is a member of WikiProject September 11, 2001. This user is a participant in WikiProject Mathematics. MS This user has a Master of Science degree. This user is an advanced mathematician.

Archives

February 2010 Template:·w January 2010 Template:·w December 2009 Template:·w September-November 2009 Template:·w August 2009 Template:·w June/July 2009 Template:·w May 2009 Template:·w April 2009

DYK for Forward Operating Base Chapman attack

On January 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Forward Operating Base Chapman attack, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 06:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Dresden Without Nazis

On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dresden Without Nazis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Some final comments?

So, you contradict yourself, while saying that my arguments are not well thought through?!?And since when do you need independent sources to know somebodies opinion? Don't they know their opinion best themselves? That wasn't very well thought through either. I think it would be better if you keep your comments to the article and the topic, and not other editors, if for no other reason that sheer ironic overload. Can wee agree on that, at least? --OpenFuture (talk) 07:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

"And since when do you need independent sources to know somebodies opinion?" - We do not need independent sources to know someone's opinion, but without an independent reliable source reporting on it, the opinion is not notable enough to be included in Misplaced Pages.

Per WP:Reliable sources, news sources are preferable to opinion pieces (which can be used under certain conditions, as explained on the policy page). As there are numerous news sources reporting on the issue at hand, i.e. on 9/11 conspiracy theories, an opinion piece is not acceptable here, because we should use the best sources that are available, of course.

I will continue to point out logical fallacies in your arguments, if necessary, so I'm afraid that we probably will not be able to agree on what you suggest.  Cs32en Talk to me  17:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, obviously news sources are preferable. So find a news source, then. Good luck finding a news source that discusses conspiracy theories. :) Or are you in fact claiming that the statement in the article is incorrect? You was asked this, and didn't answer. But you didn't replace the source with a better one, instead you claimed that the source was a bad source and should be removed because the author was conservative, which of course is complete nonsense.

You are of course welcome to point out logical fallacies that others make, even though your arguments are full of them. But it looks a bit silly, just so you know. But since you now to not discuss editors and keep away from personal comments, I'll have trouble in assuming good faith in your future personal comments towards other editors. --OpenFuture (talk) 17:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

We don't need any source there, because the section is a summary of the sub-article. You can find the news sources there. If you want to create more links to Cinnamon Stillwell's texts on the net, please use your own website.  Cs32en Talk to me  17:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Here you fail in assuming good faith, and also imply that I'm conservative, which is an insult. That breaks Wikipedias rules. --OpenFuture (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

9/11

One more stunt like that and I will report you and your friend to arbitration/AN. You were topic banned before, and I will seek an indefinite topic ban if you don't learn when to give up. –Turian (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)