Revision as of 22:53, 10 March 2010 editCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,912 edits make name clearer← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:54, 10 March 2010 edit undoCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,912 edits just one more mention to stamp it is what we're talking aboutNext edit → | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
==Golden years: 1864–1948== | ==Golden years: 1864–1948== | ||
] at a prayer gathering at the synagogue, 1942]] | ] at a prayer gathering at the synagogue, 1942]] | ||
From 1864 onwards, the |
From 1864 onwards, the Hurva Synagogue was considered the most beautiful and most important synagogue in the ].<ref name=Shragai2005>]</ref> It also housed part of the ], the largest ] in Jerusalem. It was a focal point of Jewish spiritual life in the city and was the site of the installation of the Ashkenazic chief rabbis of both Palestine and Jerusalem.<ref name=Shragai2005/> On his visit to Jerusalem in 1866, Moses Montefiore went to the synagogue, placing a silver breastplate on one of the Torah scrolls. When he visited again in 1875, a crowd of 3,000 Jews turned out to greet him.<ref name=Ben-Arieh1985p305>], p. 305</ref> On February 3, 1901 a memorial service for ] took place inside the synagogue in gratitude for the protection afforded to the Jews of Jerusalem by Britain. The service was presided over by the Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi, Shmuel Salant. According to a report in the '']'', the large building was "filled to its utmost capacity and policemen had to keep off the crowds, who vainly sought admission, by force".<ref name=Gilbert1996p2>], p. 2</ref> In 1921 ] was appointed first Chief Rabbi of Palestine at the synagogue. The synagogue also hosted ] who was honoured with reciting a portion of the Torah.<ref name=Horovitz2000p171-174/> | ||
==Destruction during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War== | ==Destruction during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War== |
Revision as of 22:54, 10 March 2010
Hurva Synagogue | |
---|---|
The Hurva Synagogue rising above the Jewish Quarter, c. 1920 | |
Religion | |
Affiliation | Orthodox Judaism |
Location | |
Location | 89 ha-Yehudim Street Old City of Jerusalem, Israel |
Geographic coordinates | 31°46′30″N 35°13′53″E / 31.77510°N 35.23135°E / 31.77510; 35.23135 |
Architecture | |
Style | Neo-Byzantine |
Construction cost | 1m piasters (1864) $7.3m (NIS 28m) (2009) |
Specifications | |
Capacity | 450 (1864) 250 (2009) |
Height (max) | 24 m (79 ft) |
The Hurva Synagogue, (Template:Lang-he Template:Hebrew, (Beit ha-Knesset ha-Hurba, lit. "The Ruin Synagogue,") also known as Hurvat Rabbi Yehudah he-Hasid ("Ruin of Rabbi Judah the Pious"), is an historic synagogue in the Jewish Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem which has been destroyed and rebuilt several times.
Traditions for a synagogue in the area date from the 2nd century. From the 16th century, the Hurva was Jerusalem's main Ashkenazi synagogue. It was destroyed by Arab creditors in 1721 and lay in ruins until the establishment of a magnificent, domed synagogue officially named the Beis Yaakov Synagogue in 1864.
The Hurva, as it was known by the public, was blown up the Arab Legion in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. After the Six-Day War in 1967, when the Old City returned to Israeli control, various plans were submitted for its reconstruction. In 1977, after years of indecision regarding the design for a new synagogue, a commemorative arch was erected at the site which became a prominent landmark. In 2000, plans were approved to rebuild the synagogue in its original form. Construction work has taken a decade, but the building is now complete and a dedication ceremony is scheduled for March 15, 2010.
Early history
The Hurva Synagogue today stands off a plaza in the centre of Jerusalem's Jewish Quarter. Excavations carried out at the site between July and August 2003 uncovered evidence from four main settlement periods: First Temple (800–600 BCE), Second Temple (100 CE), Byzantine and Ottoman. The earliest tradition regarding the site is of a synagogue existing there at the time of the 2nd-century sage Judah ha-Nasi. By the 13th-century, the area had become a courtyard for the Ashkenazic community of Jerusalem known as Der Ashkenaz (the Ashkenazic Compound). It was mentioned by Obadiah ben Abraham in 1488 who described a large courtyard containing many houses for exclusive use of the Ashkenazim, adjacent to a "synagogue built on pillars," referring to the Ramban Synagogue. The Ramban Synagogue had been used jointly by both Ashkenazim and Sephardim until 1586, when the Ottoman authorities confiscated the building. Thereafter, the Ashkenazim established a synagogue within their own, adjacent courtyard.
he-Hasid and aftermath: 1700s
In the winter of 1700, a group of around 500 Ashkenazim led by Rabbi Judah he-Hasid arrived from Europe. They were mystics who were intent on advancing the arrival of the Messianic Era by settling in Jerusalem and leading ascetic lives. A few days after their arrival in the city, he-Hasid died, and without a leader, their messianic hopes dissipated and the community began to disintegrate. Those who remained managed to build forty dwellings and a small synagogue in the Ashkenazic Compound. Soon after, they endeavoured to construct a larger synagogue, but the task proved expensive. They found themselves having to bribe the Ottoman authorities in order to enable them to proceed with their building project. Unexpected costs relating to the construction, financial hardships and the burden of various other taxes drained their funds. They became impoverished and were forced to take loans from local Arabs, eventually falling into severe debt. Pressure and threats from the creditors led to a meshulach (rabbinical emissary) being sent to abroad to solicit funds for repayment of the loans. However, many years later, the debts were still outstanding and had not been repaid. In late 1720, the Arab lenders lost patience and set the synagogue and its contents alight. The leaders of the community were imprisoned and shortly after, all the Ashkenazim were banished from the city. During the course of the next 89 years, shops were built over their courtyard and the synagogue was left desolate, in a pile of rubble. It thus became known as the "Ruin of Rabbi Judah he-Hasid".
Efforts of the Perushim: 1812–37
Old Yishuv |
---|
Jewish community in the Land of Israel under Ottoman rule |
Key events |
Key figures |
|
Economy |
Philanthropy |
Communities |
|
Synagogues |
Related articles |
Between 1808 and 1812 another group of ascetic Jews known as Perushim immigrated to Palestine from Lithuania. They were disciples of the Vilna Gaon and had settled in the city of Safed to the north. Some had wished to settle in Jerusalem but feared descendants of the Arab creditors still held the old promissory notes, relating to the century old debts incurred by the previous group of Ashkenazic immigrants, and hence their new group would inherit responsibility for repayment. The descendants of a group of Hasidim who made aliya in 1777 also presented a problem. They apparently objected to any effort by the Perushim to take control of the synagogue ruin, claiming it had never belonged to the Perushim or their ancestors. The Hasidim claimed they had closer ties with the original owners and that their rights to the parcel of land were greater.
Nevertheless, in late 1815, leader of the Safed Perushim, Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Shklov, arrived in Jerusalem with a group of followers. They directed their main efforts to rebuilding he-Hasid's synagogue, which had symbolised the expulsion of the Ashkenazim from Jerusalem. By this, they intended to demonstrate the re-establishment of Ashkenazic presence in the city. Rebuilding one of Jerusalem's ruins would also have symbolic kabbalistic significance. The "repairing" of an earlier destruction would represent the first step of rebuilding the entire city, a prerequisite for the arrival of the Messiah.
In 1816 they "pleaded with the powers in the city of Constantinople to obtain a royal decree that the Arabs residing in Jerusalem would not be permitted to enforce the debts of the Ashkenazim", but nothing came of it. A year later, several leaders of the group, including Solomon Zalman Shapira and Solomon Pach, travelled to Constantinople endeavouring to obtain such a firman (imperial decree). Two years later, in 1819, their efforts were realised and the century-old debts were cancelled. The group acquired a legal document delineating the entire site acquired by he-Hasid in 1700. The area now included dilapidated dwellings and shops built by the creditors' heirs on part of the site. Next, they had to secure another firman that would permit construction at the site, including the building of a large synagogue. Two successive missions in 1820 and 1821 to obtain the firman from the sultan's court failed.
Still awaiting imperial permission to build in the courtyard, the Perushim wished to rely on an old firman given to the Jews in 1623 which stated that there could be no objection to them building in their own quarters. Having received a supporting document issued by the Qadi of Jerusalem in March 1824, it was possible for them begin rebuilding the dwellings in the courtyard. In practice, however, construction never materialised as they were unable to exercise their authority over the plot of land. This was apparently due to confrontation with the Arab squatters and the local government's disregard of the documents proving their ownership of the courtyard.
In 1825, following the disruption the group were experiencing, Shapira travelled to Europe once again. He hoped to secure the necessary firman, which would place the courtyard firmly in the Perushim's possession, and also to raise funds to cover the costs incurred trying to redeem the courtyard. His mission, however, was unsuccessful, as was a later mission attempted in 1829 by Zalman Zoref, a Lithuanian-born silversmith.
Ali gives building consent
With the annexation of Jerusalem by Muhammad Ali of Egypt in 1831, a new opportunity arose for the Perushim. They petitioned Ali regarding the rebuilding of the synagogue, but permission was not forthcoming. Ali was apprehensive to deviate from the longstanding Muslim tradition and the Covenant of Omar, which restricted the repair or construction of non-Muslim houses of worship. However, five months after the earthquake of May 1834, Ali relaxed the prohibition and allowed the Sephardim to carry out repair works to their existing synagogues. This consent gave rise to further efforts by the Ashkenazim to receive authorisation to rebuild theirs.
On 23 June 1836, after traveling to Egypt, Zoref, together with the backing of the Austrian and Russian consuls in Alexandria, obtained the long-awaited firman. It seems he was successful in gaining support of the Austrian consul and Muhammad Ali by invoking the name of Baron Salomon Mayer von Rothschild of Vienna. Ali was hopeful that by giving his permission to rebuild the Ruin, Rothschild would be inclined to forge financial and political ties with him, which would in turn secure political support of Austria and France. In fact, Rothschild's involvement was a ruse. As soon as Zoref received the firman, he contacted Zvi Hirsch Lehren of the Clerks' Organisation in Amsterdam, requesting that funds his brother had pledged towards the building of synagogues in Palestine be applied to the Ruin. But Lehren had doubts as to what exactly the firman permitted. Explicit authorisation for construction of a large synagogue was absent. (A letter from the leaders of the Amsterdam community to Moses Montefiore in 1849 confirms that permission for a synagogue in the Ashkenasic Compound had not been sanctioned; they had only been allowed to build dwellings in the area.)
Menachem Zion Synagogue
In despite of the doubts highlighted in relation to the construction of a synagogue, the Perushim, confidently in possession of the ambiguous firman, began clearing away the rubble from the Ruin courtyard in September 1836. As the foundations of the original synagogue were revealed, they discovered a few old documents dating from 1579, signed by Israel Najara. After much debate, they decided not to rebuild over he-Hasid's Ruin, but initially erect a small structure on the edge of the compound. The Arab creditors, however, still refused to relinquish the claims they had on the Jews and continued to interfere with the works. Zoref, claiming that the Ashkenazim currently in Jerusalem were not related in any way to those who had borrowed the money at the turn of the 18th-century, was forced to appear in court requesting a further ruling cancelling the debts. He mentioned that an injunction had already been passed which absolved the Ashkenazim from repaying the debt and maintained that the Turkish Statute of Limitations cancelled out the debts of Judah he-Hasid's followers. The court ruled in the Ashkenazim's favour and the building continued. Zoref nevertheless had to appease the Arab instigators with annual bribes. At some point the arrangement ceased and they tried to kill him. One night he was shot at by an unknown assailant. On a second occasion he was struck on the head with a sword and died of his wounds three months later. In the end, the Perushim prevailed and on Friday 6 January 1837, the modest Menachem Zion Synagogue was dedicated in the north-western corner of the courtyard. In 1854, a second smaller synagogue was built within the compound. The actual plot upon which he-Hasid's synagogue had stood 130 years earlier, however, remained in ruins.
Rebuilding he-Hasid's Ruin: 1857–64
In the early 1850s, the Perushim felt ready to attempt the building a larger synagogue on he-Hasid's original site. An outcome of the Crimean War was the British Government's willingness to use its increased influence at Constantinople to intervene on behalf of its Jewish subjects who resided in Jerusalem. On 13 July 1854, James Finn of the British consulate in Jerusalem wrote to the British ambassador in Constantinople describing the wishes of the 2,000 strong Ashkenazic community to build a new synagogue. He noted that funds for construction had been collected by Moses Montefiore twelve years earlier. He also enclosed a 150-year-old firman which authorised the Ashkenazic Jews to rebuild their ruined synagogue. As the title to the plot of land was held by the Amzalag family who were British subjects, they designated London-born Rabbi Hirschell, son of Chief Rabbi of Great Britain Solomon Hirschell, to negotiate the transfer. The British consulate agreed to lend its sanction to the contract in order to avoid possible intrusion by the Turks. At issue was the question of whether the building of a synagogue at the site constituted the repair of an old house of non-Muslim worship or the establishment of a new synagogue. The Turks would have to grant a special license for the latter. This was received through the efforts of Lord Napier and Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, British ambassadors to the Sublime Porte, who secured the necessary firman in 1854. In July 1855, while in Constantinople, Montefiore was handed the firman, which he hand-delivered during his fourth visit to Jerusalem in 1857.
With permission granted, the groundbreaking ceremony took place on the last day of Chanukah of 1855. On April 22, 1856, the cornerstone was laid in the presence of Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, Shmuel Salant. Salant had been instrumental in raising the necessary funding, making a trip to Europe in 1860 and obtaining large donations, especially from Montefiore. Some of the stones used in construction of the building was purchased from the Industrial Plantation, where poor Jews assisted in quarrying and shaping the blocks. On May 7, 1856 Consul Finn inspected the site after receiving complaints from Muslims who suspected the opening of windows towards a mosque.
Although originally in possession of a lump sum they hoped would pay for the planned edifice, expenses increased. Construction work progressed slowly for lack of funds and the impoverished community soon found themselves having to arrange collections throughout the diaspora. One notable emissary, Jacob Sapir, set off for Egypt in 1857 and returned in 1863 having visited Yemen, Aden, India, Java, Australia, New Zealand and Ceylon. The largest single gift came from Yechezkel Reuben, a wealthy Sephardi Jew from Baghdad, who gave 100,000 of the million piasters needed. His son, Menashe, and daughter, Lady Sasson, later supplemented his donation. The combined donations from the Reuben family eventually covered more than half the cost. It marked an important step in the unity of the Sephardic and Ashkenazic communities of the city. Another contributor was the King Frederick William IV of Prussia, whose name was inscribed above the entrance together with those of other benefactors. He also gave permission for funds to be collected from his Jewish subjects. Throughout Western Europe emissaries sought donations with the slogan "Merit Eternal Life with one stone".
With new funds arriving, work could progress. In 1862 the domed ceiling was completed and Rabbi Yeshaya Bardaki, head of the Ashkenazic community, was honored with placing the final stone of the dome. Two years later in 1864, the new synagogue was dedicated. Present was Baron Alphonse de Rothschild, who 8 years earlier had been given the honour of laying the first stone. The edifice was officially named Beis Yaakov – "House of Jacob" – in memory of Jacob Mayer de Rothschild, whose son Edmond de Rothschild had dedicated much of his life supporting the Jews of Palestine. The locals however, continued to refer to the building as the Hurva. As a token of gratitude to the British government for their involvement, the British Consul James Finn, was invited to the dedication ceremony which included a thanksgiving service. He described the "beautiful chants and anthems in Hebrew", the subsequent refreshments provided and the playing of Russian and Austrian music.
Structure
The Hurva synagogue was designed and constructed under the supervision of Assad Effendi, the sultan's official architect. Built in neo-Byzantine style, it was supported by four massive pilasters at each corner over which soared a large dome. The construction of only one of these towers was completed. The other three were missing the upper level and the small dome which capped it. The facade was covered in finely hewn stone and incorporated 12.5 m (41 ft) high window arches. The height of the synagogue to the bottom of its dome was around 16 m (52 ft) and to the top of the dome it was 24 m (79 ft). Twelve windows were placed around the base of the dome which was surrounded by a veranda, which offered a fine view of large parts of the Old City and the area around Jerusalem. Being one of the tallest structures in the Old City, it was visible for miles.
Interior
The synagogue prayer hall was reached via an entrance with three iron gates. The length was around 15.5 m (51 ft) and the width was around 14 m (46 ft). The women's section was in the galleries, along the three sides of the chapel, except the eastern side. Access to the galleries was through towers situated at the corners of the building.
The Holy Ark had the capacity to house 50 Torah scrolls and was built on two levels. It was flanked by four Corinthian columns surrounded by baroque woodcuts depicting flowers and birds. The Ark together with its ornamental gates were taken from the Nikolaijewsky Synagogue in Kherson, Russia, which had been used by Russian Jewish conscripts, forced to spend twenty-five years in the Tsarist army. Directly above the Ark was a triangular window with rounded points. To the right and in front of the ark was the cantor's podium, which was designed as a miniature version of the two-level Ark.
The centre of the synagogue originally contained a high wooden bimah, but this was later replaced with a flat platform covered with expensive marble plates.
Numerous crystal chandeliers hung from the dome. The dome itself was painted sky-blue and strewn with golden stars. Frescoes with religious motifs, such as stars of David, the menorah, Mount Sinai and the Ten Commandments, adorned every wall. In the four corners were drawings of four animals in accordance with the statement in Pirkei Avot: "Be strong as the leopard and swift as the eagle, fleet as the deer and brave as the lion to do the will of your Father in Heaven."
One of the most generous donations came from Pinchas Rosenberg, the Imperial Court tailor of St. Petersburg. In the diary of Rabbi Chaim ha-Levy, the emissary who had been sent from Jerusalem to collect funds for the synagogue, Rosenberg set out in details what his money was intended for. Among the items which were bought with his money were two big bronze candelabras; a silver Hanukah candlestick which "arrived miraculously on the 1st Tevet precisely in time to light the last eight Hanukah candles" and an iron door made under the holy ark for safe-keeping of the candlestick. He also earmarked funds towards the building of an "artistically wrought iron fence around the roof under the upper windows so that there be a veranda on which may stand all our brethren who go up in pilgrimage to behold our desolate Temple, and also a partition for the womenfolk on the Feast of Tabernacles and Simchat Torah."
Golden years: 1864–1948
From 1864 onwards, the Hurva Synagogue was considered the most beautiful and most important synagogue in the Land of Israel. It also housed part of the Etz Chaim Yeshiva, the largest yeshiva in Jerusalem. It was a focal point of Jewish spiritual life in the city and was the site of the installation of the Ashkenazic chief rabbis of both Palestine and Jerusalem. On his visit to Jerusalem in 1866, Moses Montefiore went to the synagogue, placing a silver breastplate on one of the Torah scrolls. When he visited again in 1875, a crowd of 3,000 Jews turned out to greet him. On February 3, 1901 a memorial service for Queen Victoria took place inside the synagogue in gratitude for the protection afforded to the Jews of Jerusalem by Britain. The service was presided over by the Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi, Shmuel Salant. According to a report in the Jewish Chronicle, the large building was "filled to its utmost capacity and policemen had to keep off the crowds, who vainly sought admission, by force". In 1921 Abraham Isaac Kook was appointed first Chief Rabbi of Palestine at the synagogue. The synagogue also hosted Herbert Samuel who was honoured with reciting a portion of the Torah.
Destruction during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War
On May 25, 1948, during the battle for the Old City, commander of the Jordanian Arab Legion, Major Abdullah el Tell, wrote to Otto Lehner of the Red Cross to warn that unless the Haganah abandoned its positions in the synagogue and its adjoining courtyard, he would be forced to attack it. Moshe Russnak, commander of the Haganah in the Old City, ignored his request, knowing that if the Hurva fell, the battle for the Jewish Quarter would soon be lost. On May 26, 1948, the Jordanian Arab Legion delivered an ultimatum to the Jews to surrender within 12 hours; otherwise the Hurva would be bombarded.
On May 27, el-Tell, after receiving no answer to his proposition, told his men to "Get the Hurva Synagogue by noon." Fawzi el-Kutub executed the mission by placing a 200-litre barrel filled with explosives against the synagogue wall. The explosion resulted in a gaping hole and Haganah fighters spent forty-five minutes fighting in vain to prevent the Legionnaires from entering. When they finally burst through, they tried to reach the top of its dome to plant an Arab flag. Three were shot by snipers, but the fourth succeeded. The Arab flag flying over the Old City skyline signaled the Legion's triumph. A short while later a huge explosion reduced the 84 year old synagogue, together with the Etz Chaim Yeshiva attached to it, to rubble.
The question of whether responsibility for its destruction should rest on the shoulders of the Arab Legion or on the Haganah who had turned it into their last stronghold is debatable. What is for certain is that the building was deliberately mined and blown up after the Arabs had captured the area. el-Tell wrote in 1959 that "operations of calculated destruction had been set in motion because the Jewish Quarter had no strategic value. Its buildings and shrines were not destroyed in battle. All this took place after military activities had come to a standstill."
Post-1967: Plans sought for a new design
Following the Six-Day War, plans were mooted and designs sought for a new synagogue to be built at the site, part of the overall rehabilitation of the Jewish Quarter. Many religious and political figures supported the proposal to rebuild the original synagogue "where it was, as it was." However, the Jewish Quarter Development Company, in charge of the restoration of the Jewish Quarter, strongly opposed it. The planners and architects involved in developing the area were all secular. They stressed the nationalist basis of the project and rejected the traditional religious character of the area. Then, when "reconstruction" became the official religious and right-wing position, it became unacceptable to them. They wanted to promote unity and believed that reconstructing the synagogue of one particular group would have stirred opposition within other communities. Contrary to the 19th-century design which was meant to blend in with the Oriental landscape, Israeli architects wanted the building to reflect their modern Western identity. Additionally, although it would have been possible to rebuild it as it was, neither the architects nor the masons felt they were sufficiently qualified in traditional masonry technology to attempt it. Moreover, most of the original carved stones and surviving decorative elements had been removed, making a "reconstruction" unrealisable. Swayed by the creativity of contemporary architecture, they supported the redesign of a new Hurva by a prominent architect.
Kahn plans
Leading the campaign to rebuild the Hurva was Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Tzoref's great-great-grandson, Ya'acov Salomon. He consulted Ram Karmi, who in turn recommended Louis Kahn, a world-renowned architect who was also a founding member of the Jerusalem Committee. Between 1968 and 1973, Kahn presented three plans for the reconstruction. The ruins were incorporated in a memorial garden, with a new structure on an adjacent lot and a promenade, the "Route of the Prophets", leading to the Western Wall. Kahn proposed a structure within a structure, the outer one composed of 16 piers covered in golden Jerusalem stone cut in blocks of the same proportions as those of the Western Wall. In the bases of the four corners of the two-story, 12 m (39 ft) high structure delineated by the piers would be small alcoves for meditation or individual prayer. The inner chamber, made of four inverted concrete pyramids supporting the building's roof, would be used for daily prayer services and allow for larger crowds on Sabbath or festivals. Kahn's model was displayed in the Israel Museum, but his plan was shelved when he died in 1974. Former mayor Teddy Kollek wrote to Kahn in 1968 that "the decision concerning your plans is essentially a political one. Should we in the Jewish Quarter have a building of major importance which competes with the mosque and the Holy Sepulchre, and should we in general have any building which would compete in importance with the Western Wall?"
Boston-based architect Moshe Safdie, who has built extensively in Jerusalem and trained with Kahn in Philadelphia, was also in favour of rebuilding using contemporary design: "It's absurd to reconstruct the Hurva as if nothing had happened. If we have the desire to rebuild it, let's have the courage to have a great architect do it."
Commemorative arch and subsequent proposals
As no permanent solution could be agreed upon, a temporary, symbolic solution was created. In 1977, one of the four arches that had originally supported the synagogue's monumental dome was recreated. The 16 m (52 ft) high stone arch spanning the space where the Hurva once stood was erected by two architects. The height of the original building, including the dome, had been twice as high as the symbolic arch. Together with the remains of the building and explanatory plaques, it was a stark reminder of what had once stood at the site.
With the disputes over the modern façade of the proposed new building, which some felt did not properly match the Jewish Quarter's aesthetic, an Englishman named Sir Charles Clore took the initiative and agreed to fund the project, providing it could be completed in a specified number of years, (his wish was to see the project completed before his death). Between 1978 and 1981 Sir Denys Lasdun drew up plans that more closely adhered to the original, yet insufficiently as the plans were rejected by Prime Minister Menachem Begin, and the Minister of Interior at the time refused to sign the papers so that construction could begin. Time ran out and the Hurva was not rebuilt. However, Sir Charles's daughter provided the necessary funds to create one of the few open spaces in the Jewish Quarter adjacent to the ruined synagogue.
The Hurva featured on a $1.20 Antiguan postage stamp in 1996 and on a NIS 3.60 Israeli postage stamp in 1993 to commemorate 45 years of Israeli independence.
Final approval and reconstruction
The plan to rebuild the synagogue in its original 19th-century style received approval by the Israeli government in 2000. Jerusalem architect Nahum Meltzer, who proposed rebuilding the synagogue in its original Ottoman format, was given the commission. Meltzer stated that "both out of respect for the historical memory of the Jewish people and out of respect for the built-up area of the Old City, it is fitting for us to restore the lost glory and rebuild the Hurva Synagogue the way it was." The state-funded Jewish Quarter Development Corporation originally convinced the Israeli government to allocate $6.2 million (NIS 24m), about 85% of the cost, for the reconstruction, with private donors contributing the remainder. In the end, the government only gave NIS 11m, with the remainder being donated by a Ukrainian Jewish businessman and philanthropist, Vadim Rabinovitch.
In 2002 the Israeli mint issued a set of medals featuring the synagogue to mark the beginning of the reconstruction project.
Following comprehensive historic research, the reconstruction works began in 2005 and are expected to end in 2010. On February 15, 2007, during construction works, Rabbi Simcha ha-Cohen Kook of Rehovot, was appointed as the rabbi of the Hurva, a move confirmed by leading rabbis, including Yosef Sholom Eliashiv. On April 15, 2008 a celebration marked the placing of the keystone in the synagogues' dome.
During the reconstruction, contention arose over what kind of institution the Hurva would be. Secular and National-religious activists opposed the notion of another synagogue in the Old City and wanted the site to become a museum presenting the historical saga of the Jewish Quarter and displaying archaeological finds unearthed there. They viewed the appointment of Kook as the rabbi while the structure was still a shell as a move aimed at preventing a Modern Orthodox rabbi, who would have been more amenable to a broader utilisation of the site, from getting the position. Rabbi of the Jewish Quarter, Avigdor Nebenzahl, has been clear that he wants the building to serve as a synagogue and a house of study.
According to a prophecy made by the Vilna Gaon in the eighteenth century, the synagogue's third completion will precede the construction of the Third Temple.
Notes
- ^ Gilbert (1985), p. 97
- ^ Lefkovits (2008).
- "Emporis.com": Old Hurva Synagogue, Emporis.com
- ^ Horovitz (2000), pp. 168–174
- ^ Hasson, Nir (30 November 2009). "If the Vilna Gaon was right, the 3rd Temple is on its way". Haaretz. Retrieved 2 December 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - Shragai (2006)
- ^ Finn (1878), p. 462
- ^ Blumberg (1981), pp. 62–63
- Shulman (1992), p. 51-52
- ^ Millgram (1990), pp. 109–114
- Rossoff (1997)
- ^ Lis (2008)
- Rossoff (1998), p. 119
- ^ Morgenstern (2006), pp. 99
- ^ Morgenstern (2006), pp. 114–115
- ^ Morgenstern (2006), p. 117
- Morgenstern (2006), p. 118
- Morgenstern (2006), p. 119
- ^ Morgenstern (2006), p. 120
- ^ Rossoff (1998), pp. 185-186
- ^ Morgenstern (2006), p. 121
- ^ Shragai (2008)
- ^ Ricca (2007), pp. 104–110
- Gilbert (1985), pp. 79–80
- Blumberg (1981), p. 215
- Gilbert (1985), p. 84. Differing dates are given for delivery of this firman. Blumberg (1981), pp. 62–63, claims it was given in 1856 and Millgram (1990), p. 112, 1857.
- ^ Rossoff (1998), p. 239
- Finn (1878), p. 463
- Blumberg (1981), p. 226
- Gilbert (1985), pp. 98–99
- Wasserstein (2001), p. 51
- Rossoff (1998), p. 240
- Maoz (1975), p. 155
- Kroyanker (1994), p. 85
- ^ Shragai (2005)
- Rigler (2005)
- Ben-Arieh (1985), p. 305
- Gilbert (1996), p. 2
- ^ Collins (1973), pp. 492–494
- Rabinovich & Reinharz (2008), p. 82
- Safdie (1989), p. 82. "This was not done in the heat of battle, but by official order. Explosives were placed carefully and thoughtfully under the springing points of the domes, of the great Hurva synagogue."
- Jeffers (2004), p. 164.
- ^ Green (2004)
- Eisenberg, Ronald L. The Jewish World in Stamps: 4000 Years of Jewish Civilization in Postal Stamps, Schreiber Pub., 2002, p. 213. ISBN 1887563768
- Hurva Synagogue - Gold Medal, Israel Coins & Medals Corp.
- (Hebrew) (20 February 2007). "The Hurva returns to life". Chadrei Charedim. Retrieved 25 July 2007.
References
Books
- Ben-Arieh, Yehoshua. Jerusalem in the Nineteenth Century, The Old City, St. Martin's Press, 1985. ISBN 0-312-44187-8
- Blumberg, Arnold & Finn, James and Elizabeth Anne. A View from Jerusalem, 1849–1858, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1981. ISBN 0-838622712
- Collins, Larry & Lapierre, Dominique. O Jerusalem!, Pan Books, 1973. LCCN 97-0 ISBN 0-330-23514-1
- Finn, James. Stirring Times, Adamant Media Corporation, 2004; . ISBN 140215089X
- Gilbert, Martin. Jerusalem, Rebirth of a City, Chatto & Windus, 1985. ISBN 0-701128925
- Gilbert, Martin. Jerusalem in the Twentieth Century, Chatto & Windus, 1996. ISBN 0-701130709
- Horovitz, Ahron. Jerusalem, Footsteps Through Time, Feldheim, 2000. ISBN 1583303987
- Jeffers, H. Paul. The Complete Idiot's Guide to Jerusalem, Alpha Books, 2004. ISBN 1592571794
- Kroyanker, David. Jerusalem Architecture, Tauris Parke Books, 1994. ISBN 1-85043-873-0
- Maoz, Moshe. Studies on Palestine during the Ottoman period, Magnes Press, 1975.
- Millgram, Abraham Ezra. Jerusalem Curiosities, Jewish Publication Society, 1990. ISBN 0827603584
- Morgenstern, Arie. Hastening Redemption, Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 0195305787
- Rabinovich, Itamar & Reinharz, Jehuda. Israel in the Middle East, UPNE, 2008. ISBN 0874519624
- Ricca, Simone. Reinventing Jerusalem, Profile Books, 2001. ISBN 1861973330
- Rossoff, Dovid. Where Heaven Touches Earth, Guardian Press, 1998. ISBN 0-87306-879-3
- Safdie, Moshe. Jerusalem: The Future of the Past, Houghton Mifflin, 1989. ISBN 0395353750
- Shulman, Yaakov Dovid. Pathway to Jerusalem: The Travel Letters of Rabbi Ovadiah of Bartenura, CIS Publishers, 1992. ISBN 1-56062-130-3
- Wasserstein, Bernard. Divided Jerusalem, I.B.Tauris, 2007. ISBN 184511387-X
Newspapers and magazines
- Green, David. "From the ruins: A master architect's attempt to rebuild on sacred ground", Boston Globe, February 29, 2004. Accessed 2007-07-25
- Lefkovits, Etgar. "Hurva Synagogue restoration nears completion", Jerusalem Post, March 28, 2008. Accessed October 25, 2008
- Lis, Jonathan. "Ruined synagogue to get new arch", Haaretz, April 15, 2008. Accessed October 25, 2008
- Rigler, Sara Yoheved. "Destroying Synagogues Again", Aish.com, September 13, 2005. Accessed November 2, 2008
- Rossoff, Dovid. "The Churva Synagogue", Jewish Magazine, December 1997. Accessed October 25, 2008
- Shragai, Nadav. "Out of the ruins", Haaretz, December 20, 2005. Accessed January 8, 2007
- Shragai, Nadav. "Byzantine arch found at site of renovated Jerusalem synagogue", Haaretz, November 28, 2006. Accessed July 25, 2007
- Shragai, Nadav. "The first official victim of terror", Haaretz, May 5, 2008. Accessed August 11, 2008
Bibliography
- Halper, Jeff (1991), Between redemption and revival: the Jewish yishuv of Jerusalem in the nineteenth century, Westview Press, ISBN 0813378559
External links
- The Hurva Synagogue – Company for the Reconstruction and Development of the Jewish Quarter
- The Hurva Synagogue excavation, July–August 2003 – Israel Antiquities Authority
- The Hurva Synagogue – Survey of the building's interior – Israel Antiquities Authority
- Proposed design and site documentation drawings for the Hurva by Louis Khan – Philadelphia Architects and Buildings