Revision as of 08:12, 15 January 2006 editDaycd (talk | contribs)7,074 edits →LBU entry: two users are fighting this out from the same computer← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:13, 15 January 2006 edit undoDaycd (talk | contribs)7,074 edits →LBU entry: copy editNext edit → | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
|} | |} | ||
I'm assuming the bold above is a different user to the normal text. Those edits are minutes apart. ] ] |
::::I'm assuming the bold above is a different user to the normal text. Those edits are minutes apart. The weirdness continues, IP 207.200.116.6 made the following two edits 50 minutes apart . It does not get stranger than that. ] ] 08:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::The weirdness continues, IP 207.200.116.6 made the following two edits 50 minutes apart . It does not get stranger than that. ] ] 08:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:13, 15 January 2006
Archive | Timeframe |
---|---|
New user | October 21st 2004 – September 20th 2005 |
New admin | September 21th 2005 – October 31st 2005 |
Signpost | November 2005 – December 31st 2005 |
What the heck is this gonna do? RoyBoy 05:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
24 December 2024 |
|
HeHe sorry
I didn't know that many flags could do that... However I will admit my Ukranian invasion was over the top, even for my monitor. 68.39.174.238 07:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- There, I did it again with some |thumb's so it shouldn't crash you up. I couldn't resist his obnoxious comment/warnings blanking... 68.39.174.238 07:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
You owe 66.17.116.148 an apology. Jim16 00:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Janitorial WikiMedal
Regarding 66.17.116.148
You owe him/her an apology for blanking his talk page. It was not nice of you to revert his own edits to his talk page. Jim16 01:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Re. User:Jim16 & User:66.17.116.148
Please see my comment on Administrators' noticeboard & User_talk:Jim16. -- KTC 03:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for WikiThanks.
After noting abusive behaviour on top of sock puppetrying (and various charges of vandalism on the anon. history), I've posted on WP:ANI. -- KTC 20:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Rollback priveleges
Please see my entry, and support me if possible!--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 18:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Much appreciation for your barnstars and your formatting of my userpage. --ScienceApologist 21:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm in
I'm watching. I'm approving. Keep counting me "in" until I say otherwise, if you please. "Me too" is weak; but it's me. WAS 4.250 06:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
REV
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page 220.247.253.200 04:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Deletion help
Someone tried to create an AfD but is running into trouble, think you can help us out? - Rudykog 06:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Nevermind, someone fixed it, sorry to bother you. - Rudykog 06:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
I have never vandalised wikipedia
I must say that I found your note to me somewhat offensive as I never vandalised wikipedia or even looked at the article you refer to. It may be that every AOL user comes up the same (as we sem to be classified as multiple users) but rest assured I have not done anything untoward. I havent even read the page on 'cattle' until today and have nothing to add to that. Ben
Reverting
Hello RoyBoy, how are you able to revert as fast as you are? CDVF alone can't be it. Thanks! Cyberevil 04:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Now that I call elegant! :) Cyberevil 04:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Whoa, thanks again. You really made this a science. No wonder you are so fast! :) Cyberevil 04:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'll fix myself a coffee now and set me up as an uber-vandalfighter, thanks to you! Cyberevil 04:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Whoa, thanks again. You really made this a science. No wonder you are so fast! :) Cyberevil 04:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
User page vandalism
Yet again I have to thank you, Roy! This time for reverting that vandalism. Cyberevil 03:34, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
192.195.225.6
Do you think that was a bot or a very fast typist? Are there known 'vandal bots' floating around out there? It appears as if it was grabbing articles via the random article link and blanking them systematically. Ohnoitsjamietalk 07:51, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks for supporting me on my Rfa, RoyBoy! I appreciate your trust. I have no idea what "Don't stop... don't stop the funk!" means, but if it means "carry on!" I will endeavor to do so. The puppy is now an Admin (final tally 58/7/2) Please let me know if there is anything I can ever do to assist you. KillerChihuahua 17:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC) |
LBU entry
- WarriorScribe is a jackass, so don't expect there to be a consensus. He's bent on trying to discredit LBU and remove the notable alumni. Overall, he's against religious people and their endeavors. The bottom line is there is no good reason, no reputable source, and no proof that LBU is a diploma mill. The accusation is a fabrication of WarriorScribe's making and it has been perpetuated by a couple of his friends. You would think SOMETHING could be found in Google if his lies were even remotely true. But nothing exists because he just made it up and he wants to push his opinion into Misplaced Pages. --207.200.116.72 06:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Brave boy, that Gastrich, hiding behind false names and IP addresses. And such a fine, Christian attitude, too!
- Gastrich can whimper and whine about lies all he wants...the record speaks for itself and it wouldn't take much to provide more evidence that Gastrich is about self-promotion (even if it means lying, which he does often). Furthermore, I don't think I introduced the "diploma mill" commentary into the discussion, and it is not a "fabrication." Let's consider that there were reasons why even the state of Louisiana was, shall we say, a tad reluctant...to allow LBU a license to operate. Gastrich has a personal stake in all of this since he's a "graduate student" at the school. He can't separate feelings from facts.
- Having said all of that, I don't have a problem with a concensus. In fact, if you'll check the edits, even after I said that the list should be fully gone, I actually put it back once, in reduced form, thinking that maybe a smaller list with some rather relaxed criteria would be okay.
- I have nothing against religious people. For one thing, I'm Jewish. I attend shul on Saturdays and observe the High Holy Days as much as I am able. And Gastrich cannot demonstrate a single lie on my part, while I can demonstrate many on his. All you have to do is ask, and you know what? I may not even wait for that... WarriorScribe 07:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, Roy! Take a look at this and check the history and the changes back and forth under the same IP. Any ideas? WarriorScribe 08:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Just to make this more obvious I am going to paste this here. There is some very strange editing occuring on the LBU page. There areconflicting edits in the revert war coming from the same computer. There is no way a dynamic IP would keep shifting between two users this way. Judging from the time differences they are the same person or in the room together. This looks a lot like trolling hell from my perspective.
The following edits were made by IP 207.200.116.10
23:23, 14 January 2006 (hist) (diff) Louisiana Baptist University (rv POV pushing (it's obviously not a diploma mill). lbu has a campus, library, sizable faculty, 1100+ students, legitimate coarse and writing requirements, lengthy thesis and dissertation requirements) 23:17, 14 January 2006 (hist) (diff) Louisiana Baptist University (A source of accusation cited. US Department of Education Cited. LBU's dissertation cited. LOC dissertation practice cited. Deal with it Jason.) 23:12, 14 January 2006 (hist) (diff) Louisiana Baptist University (rv POV pushing) 23:11, 14 January 2006 (hist) (diff) Louisiana Baptist University (A source of accusation cited. US Department of Education Cited. LBU's dissertation cited. LOC dissertation practice cited. Deal with it Jason.) 22:56, 14 January 2006 (hist) (diff) Louisiana Baptist University (rv - no professional source for Diploma mill accusation, only ludicrous POV) |
- I'm assuming the bold above is a different user to the normal text. Those edits are minutes apart. The weirdness continues, IP 207.200.116.6 made the following two edits 50 minutes apart . It does not get stranger than that. David D. (Talk) 08:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)