Misplaced Pages

User talk:Parasti: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:07, 15 January 2006 editDanteferno (talk | contribs)2,428 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:22, 15 January 2006 edit undoLeyasu (talk | contribs)2,797 edits →"No Discussion" does not equal ConcensusNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:


I was offline on business for the second half of December, thus had no opportunity to edit and involve myself with the Misplaced Pages ] discussion/article or other articles. Even if I was still here, there wouldn't have been any concensus, or difference as to what would happen - ] would have one view of what he/she thinks should become of the Temp page, and others would think there was still work that needed to be done. (It appears user ] had some continued disagreement with ] during my absence) Please re-consider the actions you took and review the GM discussion. Please explain how a "majority" accepted ]'s version as accurate and non-skewed. Because frankly, the only person who says otherwise is ]. ---] 22:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC) I was offline on business for the second half of December, thus had no opportunity to edit and involve myself with the Misplaced Pages ] discussion/article or other articles. Even if I was still here, there wouldn't have been any concensus, or difference as to what would happen - ] would have one view of what he/she thinks should become of the Temp page, and others would think there was still work that needed to be done. (It appears user ] had some continued disagreement with ] during my absence) Please re-consider the actions you took and review the GM discussion. Please explain how a "majority" accepted ]'s version as accurate and non-skewed. Because frankly, the only person who says otherwise is ]. ---] 22:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

: And all the users who are sockpuppets, which apparantly, you are as well Parasti. Or you will become one, if you keep disagreeing. ] 22:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:22, 15 January 2006

Welcome!

Hello Parasti, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- SoothingR 12:36, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

That is for like if I link my autobiography about my life, but I see your point. However, I need use "A Growing Metal Forum" as a comment which is true. My site can be notable one day. But even not it can still be of use to someone. And I think of it as not MY site BUT a site open to all METALHEADS. METALGOD42088 03:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Danteinferno

Nice call on the templates. Hes doing this because i revised the article when he written it, mostly coz it was all a crock of shit. Now he is back and hes going around reverting my edits and reverting most any edits made to the articles that are 'his' that he lists on his user page.

Might want to keep any eye on the Gothic Metal page as such, make sure this vandalism and disruption of Misplaced Pages doesnt carry on. Leyasu 13:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Gothic Metal article

No, there was no concensus reached. There were many arguments/points unsettled that Leyasu still failed to answer, and the archive of the discussion reflects that well. And removing those tags without bringing it up to discussion constitutes as vandalism. Danteferno 14:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

A consensus was reached in which Danteinferno kept calling everyone sock puppets and trolls that didnt agree with him, another user also supervised the revision into being a pretty good article. It also follows through that my earlier point about Dante shows when he has been following every comment i make. Again, i will point out removing the tags is fine and doesnt count as vandalism when its an attempt at undermining the consensus which didnt agree with Dante. Leyasu 16:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

"No Discussion" does not equal Concensus

I was offline on business for the second half of December, thus had no opportunity to edit and involve myself with the Misplaced Pages Gothic Metal discussion/article or other articles. Even if I was still here, there wouldn't have been any concensus, or difference as to what would happen - Leyasu would have one view of what he/she thinks should become of the Temp page, and others would think there was still work that needed to be done. (It appears user Idont havaname had some continued disagreement with Leyasu during my absence) Please re-consider the actions you took and review the GM discussion. Please explain how a "majority" accepted Leyasu's version as accurate and non-skewed. Because frankly, the only person who says otherwise is Leyasu. ---Danteferno 22:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

And all the users who are sockpuppets, which apparantly, you are as well Parasti. Or you will become one, if you keep disagreeing. Leyasu 22:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)