| Revision as of 15:42, 7 April 2010 edit207.237.230.164 (talk) this Rfc is regarding Ash's BLP contributions and nothing more.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:42, 7 April 2010 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 207.237.230.164 - "this Rfc is regarding Ash's BLP contributions and nothing more."Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Per , it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. ] (]) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | Per , it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. ] (]) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...] (]) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | : Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...] (]) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::...while giving the finger with the other? The outcome of this RfC will pertain to the issues addressed in the Statement of the Dispute, and nothing more. Should more changes be desired, they should be addressed directly. | ::...while giving the finger with the other? The outcome of this RfC will pertain to the issues addressed in the Statement of the Dispute, and nothing more. Should more changes be desired, they should be addressed directly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 7 April 2010
Per Delicious carbuncle's comments here, it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...Bali ultimate (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- ...while giving the finger with the other? The outcome of this RfC will pertain to the issues addressed in the Statement of the Dispute, and nothing more. Should more changes be desired, they should be addressed directly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.230.164 (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)