Misplaced Pages

Exploitation film: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:45, 13 May 2004 editGTBacchus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers60,420 editsm link play← Previous edit Revision as of 04:13, 13 May 2004 edit undoCatherineMunro (talk | contribs)14,639 edits spellingNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
Subcategories of exploitation films include the following: Subcategories of exploitation films include the following:


* Classic Exploitation films made in the ] and ] were sensationalist fare at the time, and are now valued by afficionados for their ] and ] value. The most famouse example of these is '']''. * Classic Exploitation films made in the ] and ] were sensationalist fare at the time, and are now valued by aficionados for their ] and ] value. The most famous example of these is '']''.


* Black Exploitation, or "]" films, are made with black actors, ostensibly for black audiences, and about stereotypically ] themes such as slum life, ], and ]. Examples from the 1970s, when Blaxploitation was introduced, include '']'' and '']''. * Black Exploitation, or "]" films, are made with black actors, ostensibly for black audiences, and about stereotypically ] themes such as slum life, ], and ]. Examples from the 1970s, when Blaxploitation was introduced, include '']'' and '']''.


* Sex Exploitation, or "]" films, are similar to soft-core ], in that the film serves largely as a vehicle for showing scenes involving nude women. Russ Meyer's ] is one example. * Sex Exploitation, or "]" films, are similar to soft-core ], in that the film serves largely as a vehicle for showing scenes involving nude women. Russ Meyer's '']'' is one example.


Directors associated with exploitation film include: Directors associated with exploitation film include:

Revision as of 04:13, 13 May 2004

Exploitation is the name given to genre of films, extant since the earliest days of moviemaking, but popularized in the 1970s. Exploitation films typically sacrifice traditional notions of artistic merit for the sensational display of some topic about which the audience may be curious, or have some prurient interest.

Some of the earliest exploitation films were pitched as sensationalist exposés of some drug or sex-related scandal, and were made independently of the major Hollywood studios, thus avoiding restrictions of the Production Code and providing a revenue source for independent theaters. Now that the major motion picture studios allow much more latitude in subject matter, it is not necessary for independent producers to cater to audiences' desires to view such things. Thus, in modern cinema, roles have reversed somewhat, with major studios catering to the so-called "lowest common denominator", while art films are more typically made independently.

Subcategories of exploitation films include the following:

  • Classic Exploitation films made in the 1930s and 1940s were sensationalist fare at the time, and are now valued by aficionados for their nostalgia and irony value. The most famous example of these is Reefer Madness.

Directors associated with exploitation film include:

This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.