Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:22, 16 April 2010

Archives

2004

Entire year

2005

Jan • Jun

Jul • Dec

2006

Jan • Jun

Jul • Dec

2007

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2008

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2009

Jan • Jun

Jul • Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2010

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2011

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2012

Entire year

2013

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2014

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep • Dec

2015

Entire year

2016

Entire year

2017

Entire year

2018

Entire year

2019

Entire year

2020

Entire year

2021

Entire year

2022

Entire year

2023

Entire year

2024

Entire year

PirateSmackK

Steven Pledger is a different piratesmack. I hadn't even been to EncyclopediaDramatica.com until PirateSmackK sent me a link to the article. Keep my info there if you want, just know that you guys aren't hurting PirateSmackK at all.

-The other piratesmack (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Aoibhinn Ní Shúilleabháin

Hi Alison, I saw you're an admin on the Irish language Misplaced Pages. I thought it would be a great idea to start an article on Ní Shúilleabháin there since she speaks Irish fluently, helps host the Seachtain na Gaeilge this year, and worked in traditional Irish music. Can you translate perhaps the intro or direct me to someone willing to help? Thanks a lot. Best Hekerui (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Alison, should I ask someone else? Thanks. Hekerui (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. Sorry for the delay, but I've been really busy all week with RL stuff. I'll try to get something started this weekend, once I get the chance here - Alison 20:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

note

Hi, could you let me know if you got (mid-late Feb ish) my note? Hope the park was nice earlier in the week! Thanks muchly. –Whitehorse1 16:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

User talk:There Is No Cabal caught in autoblock of a checkuserblock you placed

Please see above-noted talk page. Thank you, –xeno 16:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Ping

Hi Alison, could you please check your email. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Filtered

Hi Alison, due to recent activity I've extended filter 294 to apply to you as well. Please let me know if you would prefer otherwise. Thanks! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 22:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey Alison, i've sent you an email

that's all, just wanted to let you know!

thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Askkaty2write (talk • contribs) 03:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. I've replied, and have also restored your page to your userspace so you can work on it. Let me know if you need anything else! - Alison 06:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Lesserextent

User apparently got busted in a CU rangeblock. Ja or nein on IPBE? —Jeremy 09:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous (film)

Will you please userfy the article to me at User:MichaelQSchmidt/workspace/Anonymous (film)? I wish to use available sources brought up at the AFD to address copyvio and clean up the article before myself moving it to WP:INCUBATE in anticipation of further expansion and sourcing before its possible return to mainspace. Thank you Schmidt, 17:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Michael. That's  Done now - just please don't leave the copyvio text hanging around any longer than needs be. I'll NOINDEX it in a minute ... - Alison 17:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Done. Already it no longer resembles what was sent to AFD. :) I'll get back to it this evening to expand and source further. Might I ask you to look in before sending to incubation? Schmidt, 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I need your assistance ASAP

I need your input on a CU related case. Please let me know when you are on. (PS It's not on en.wiki). Dusti 19:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

It wasn't purely disruptive.

Don't treat my comment that way. I accept its removal because of the personal information. But there is a deep truth in what I said and that is about the origin of all those problems of which many are to blame. It is funny how it is the style in Misplaced Pages of using categorical adjectives. "purely", "highly". It is like people don't know how to make sense of themselves. I understand that she didn't like being exposed, but she also need to learn what are the things that she is doing wrong, and is still doing wrong. I have seen the effects occurring over and over again, and are still happening. Abisharan (talk) 22:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I absolutely will treat it that way, actually, even though it's just boilerplate text. In fact your comment came close to being oversighted. What you said was immensely cruel and completely uncalled-for and at the very least, comes under WP:NPA. Seriously, even your comment above smacks of retribution and 'punishment'. It was completely over the top and, frankly, you owe her an apology - Alison 23:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

• It doesn't make any difference sweetie. It is not me who is having problems constantly. And as you can research, it is a problem that she is choosing to ignore or even worst, to try playing the heroine/martyr. If she really cares she still need to ask me what have she and is she doing wrong if she haven't discover it yet. I just said a plain truth, maybe cryptic if you don't know all the aspects of it but still immensely true. I don't mind apologizing, I don't loose anything that way (let me do it right now) but will it solve anything? The one who has a problem to solve is she. Abisharan (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

'scuse me - "sweetie"? Are you trying to be deliberately offensive here or do patronizing terms like this just trip off your tongue? :( Either way, it's not part of your remit to somehow make her see the error of her ways, or whatever, and especially not with gratuitously offensive, personal attacks. Just don't do that stuff - Alison 23:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

• Hi Alison, thank you for your help. I added two and two together and now I know who the user is. The user has retired as Dr. Jekyll, and came back few days later as Mr. Hyde. with the sole purpose "to help" me to get out of the loop. And although my discovery made me sick to my stomach, at the same time I feel so much better now, when I know who the user is. You said what the user has done to me was cruel. At first I also thought that it is the case, but now I know, the user is not cruel, the user simply needs some help, and I feel sorry for the user. I wish I were able to help, but I am not sure how. Best wishes. --Mbz1 (talk) 03:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

• Sole purpose? Just look my at my user contributions. Sorry, but you are prizing yourself too much thinking that the my sole purpose is to "help you". It is the other way around. Just by chance, I noticed that your problems had not stopped (since they even came to disrupt FPC). You are being a bit paranoid as you were when I reviewed one of your pictures in the most impersonal and objective way, as I always try to do. I just happens that among the things that I see, I support those that I think are right. No matter what. When I saw people doing wrong to you I condemned it. If I see you doing wrong I tell you. But not more than once. You say that I need some help. Go ahead, tell me the symptoms that you see. (In my talk page, since Alison should be annoyed with all these posts.) Abisharan (talk) 03:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

• People have been offended so many times that just want to be offended. Sweetie means just that. I use language in the plainest possible way, since I don't have the skills to bend it ingeniously. It I want to offend I would use again plain and clear offenses. Take it as an edulcorantion of the dialogue to counterbalance your emphasized (will). About my remit, it is mine, my own. If it there is something that we own, that is the choice of what to do with the time that it is given to us. About my remit, only me is to know what it is, and it was to point those error. I did it in and improper way? My bad. But it certainly was not an attack. More like a hurtful surgical healing procedure that opened a wound to purge a tumor. Abisharan (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, as clearly your comments have hurt others, maybe you would consider changing the way they are phrased (and therefore not hurting others) or stopping it. They aren't helping. —Airplaneman— 02:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

• And so I did. My only other comment was an apology as I was asked to do. The root and real purpose of all the story will not change. As I believe it and is quite evident. Mbz1 needs help to come out of a loop of mistakes in which got involved and even worst people with the aim of helping and with good will are, involuntarily, helping her to stay in it. Now, it can not be done without her will to do it. That's why it doesn't make sense for me to continue until then. Maybe you can try. For me once is enough and twice is too much. Abisharan (talk) 02:55, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

SPI

Hi Alison, could you take a look at this SPI report? You reviewed the prior complaint and I was wondering if this matches what you found so interesting in that one. Thanks, nableezy - 01:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

~ Dwayne Flanders was here! 17:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Email

Hi Alison, did you get the email that I sent to you yesterday? Graham87 06:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Page move: Intersexuality -> Intersex_Intersex-2010-03-29T14:41:00.000Z">

because you expressed interest in this, I am notifying you of the formal request here:

Talk:Intersexuality#Requested move

Mish (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)_Intersex"> _Intersex">

Talkback

~ Dwayne Flanders was here! 19:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Advice about a possible block

As per Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Tony winward, I feel that although a CU has been declined, the IP certainly is making quacking noises.

Would I be justified in blocking Anthony Winward (talk · contribs) for 1 month?

I've never dealt with a case like this before (I've only been an admin for 2 months!) and would appreciate any advice on how to deal with it.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Swami Nithyananda (Dhyanapeetam)

I've just protected the page (and the talk page), but there are some edits that would need oversight. Can you take a look please? —SpacemanSpiff 17:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I've just deleted the relevant revisions, which may be sufficient. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Email

Ping. I hope you check email more frequently than your current editing pace, but thought I'd leave a note here too.  fetchcomms☛ 04:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Curious about the block of GeneralCheese

Hi. I see you blocked GeneralCheese for sockpuppetry. I was wondering if you could tell me what you found on him. He was a user I had been keeping an eye on... I'm honestly not surprised by this, but am curious about the circumstances. Thanks in advance, Auntie E. (talk) 04:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello again. I am still curious about this case. Is there a reason that the puppeteer of this account has not been named? This puppet was a major timesink in addition to being an "admin hopeful". Admin hopefuls socking is a major concern to many of us here. Auntie E. (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

User talk:92.40.31.27

This user is saying there is some massive collateral resulting from a rangeblock you imposed--can you look into it? Blueboy96 07:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

• I'm sorry, but unblocking that range right now would be highly inappropriate. See this and this for examples from just today, as well as stuff like this - Alison 22:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Dear Allie, thank you for centering things on my userpage and semi-protecting it so people cannot vandalize my userpage. Your help is very much appreciated Love, ~ Dwayne was here!

Talkback

Hi Alison, im requesting that you delete one of the photo's in the file history, more information is located on my talk page under the Image history section. Thank you! Dwayne was here! 02:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

LPTF

Hey Alison, I'd like to get in touch with you tomorrow (Monday) afternoon at some point if I can. Thanks! Keegan (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• Let me know what times - I'm actually on vacation next week. If it's Skype or IRC, I should be able to do it. RL isn't giving me much internets time right now :/ - Alison 05:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, that answered my email query. :-) Bielle (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Aye!

As usual, me is here to tickle you again with a little CU request... is Sukarnobhumibol (talk · contribs) remotely related to 23prootie (talk · contribs)? <3 Thanks again! :) --Dave 10:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Afatatlot

I think that User:Afatatlot, User:Uberfuzzy the big fat poo, and User:82.11.177.252 are the same person. This is WP:DUCK, right? I think that it's pretty obvious considering their contributions to Talk:Allah, The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles, Talk:The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles, and User talk:82.11.177.252. Do I still have to start a suckpuppetry investigation, or can they be blocked now? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 02:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

It should also be noted that Wikia staff member User:Uberfuzzy blocked 82.11.177.252 at the Kingdom Under Fire Wikia. I believe that this is why User:82.11.177.252 created the User:Uberfuzzy the big fat poo sockpuppet. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Heretodeliveramessage is another of his sockpuppets. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Please also check my YouTube profile. Afatatlot is obviously TheElderscrolls5 and Suarezfamilykilled. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Afatatlot – I decided to start a sockpuppetry investigation instead. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Durova's 'dead tree' criteria, I'm curious ;), can u tell me more? --Chris.urs-o (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

how to revert earlier version in case of vandalism

i

i am kinda new to wiki. i am mostly interested in reverting vandalistic edits. i would like to have your help in understanding in how to revert earlier versions in scenario like this.

a page gets valid edits at 2pm.it gets vandalised at 3 pm.the same page also gets vandalised at 4pm .now if i am to "undo" the changes, then i can revert only to the 3pm version from the 4pm version.

how ppl are doing the reverts directly to 2pm version from 4pm ?

thx,

Cosmos 17:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

As Alison is not currently available, I'm attempting a response here. Cosmos, if you haven't been around long enough to have access to specific tools, like Rollback for example, you start with the earliest vandalism and keep undoing, moving forward in time until you have them all. Well, that's what I used to do. If there are a lot of vandal edits, ask a friendly admin or other user with the rights to help out. It would also be helful if you were to sign your name to your posts using the 4 tildes ~~~~ so that we can look at the problem and perhaps provide better assistance. :-) Bielle (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Another way to go about this is to click on the earlier revision in the history (simply click on the timestamp) and then edit it, enter an edit summary ("rv to old version due to vandalism") and then click save. Be sure you don't roll over any good edits in between. –xeno 17:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Brexx

Lil-unique1 decided to take the Brexx problem to a wider community at WP:ANI#Long term sock puppet and ducker.. I'm not sure it was necessary, but not sure it's a bad idea either. You may wish to participate.—Kww(talk) 20:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

piracy of copyrighted work or potential copyright violation

http://en.wikipedia.org/File_talk:Puffer_Fish_DSC01257.JPG

Please have a look at the link above.

I sense a potential copyright violation.

I do not know whom to send this too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmoskramer (talk • contribs) 09:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

• de-lurk (I'm away right now and have limited access). The original file is the Commons one by User:Mbz1, who's rather known for her excellent image work. The Commons pic has full EXIF embedded information while the other website image does not. The Commons pic is a full-resolution image whereas the other site is not and is thus not a derivative of the other site's image. The EXIF original date shows 2004:09:07 10:47:18 which is what Mbz1 states in her original upload message, though she uploaded it in June 2007. The third-party website is, of course, free to use it for whatever purpose, per the license, but they should really have provided attribution as 1) it's in the CC-BY-SA license, 2) It's only polite and proper and 3) it prevents confusion such as this. In short, there are no real copyright problem with the image, from either site's perspective - Alison 12:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)