| Revision as of 21:13, 16 April 2010 editDarknessShines2 (talk | contribs)11,264 edits replace lede with Cla`s version from my sandbox← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:00, 17 April 2010 edit undoSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm Date maintenance tags and general fixes: build 407:, added orphan tagNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{multiple issues|orphan =April 2010|notability =April 2010|POV =April 2010}} | |||
| {{notability}}{{pov}} | |||
| {{Infobox website | {{Infobox website | ||
| | name = Bishop Hill | | name = Bishop Hill | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''Bishop Hill''' is ] operated by ], author of ]. The blog was founded on November 21, 2006. At first focusing on British politics, Montford, after following a link from a blog posted by ] to ] changed the blog's focus to ] from a ]. Montford`s layperson's explanations of the Hockey Stick debate have received comment in the media, specifically his summaries of posts from ] which he called the "Caspar And The Jesus Paper" <ref name="Andrew Montford">{{cite web|url=http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html|title=Caspar and the Jesus paper|last=Montford|first=Andrew|date= |
'''Bishop Hill''' is ] operated by ], author of ]. The blog was founded on November 21, 2006. At first focusing on British politics, Montford, after following a link from a blog posted by ] to ] changed the blog's focus to ] from a ]. Montford`s layperson's explanations of the Hockey Stick debate have received comment in the media, specifically his summaries of posts from ] which he called the "Caspar And The Jesus Paper" <ref name="Andrew Montford">{{cite web|url=http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html|title=Caspar and the Jesus paper|last=Montford|first=Andrew|date=August 11, 2008|publisher=bishophill.squarespace.com|accessdate=14 April 2010}}</ref><ref name="Matt Ridley">{{cite news|url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/politics/all/5749853/the-global-warming-guerrillas.thtml|title=The global warming guerrillas|last=Ridley|first=Matt|date=3RD FEBRUARY 2010|publisher=www.spectator.co.uk|accessdate=9 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| ==Climate change advocacy== | ==Climate change advocacy== | ||
| ] writing for the ] on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the ] published their findings said, sceptics on the website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up." <ref name="Roger Harrabin ">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm|title=Climate science must be more open, say MPs|last=Harrabin |first=Roger |date=31 March 2010|publisher=news.bbc.co.uk|pages=1 |
] writing for the ] on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the ] published their findings said, sceptics on the website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up." <ref name="Roger Harrabin ">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm|title=Climate science must be more open, say MPs|last=Harrabin |first=Roger |date=31 March 2010|publisher=news.bbc.co.uk|pages=1|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| Bradly Fikes, a reporter for the '']'' wrote "The truth that the Greenpeace fanatics (and some at the New York Times) can’t process is that opposition to global warming alarmism is a decentralized guerrilla campaign against global warming extremism. There is no central command of large corporations directing anti-warmist blogs such as Watts Up With That?, or EUReferendum or Bishop Hill, etc" <ref name="Bradley Fikes">{{cite news|url=http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=8640|title=Greenpeace Thug Threatens Global Warming Skeptics “We know where you live”|last=Fikes|first=Bradley |date=April |
Bradly Fikes, a reporter for the '']'' wrote "The truth that the Greenpeace fanatics (and some at the New York Times) can’t process is that opposition to global warming alarmism is a decentralized guerrilla campaign against global warming extremism. There is no central command of large corporations directing anti-warmist blogs such as Watts Up With That?, or EUReferendum or Bishop Hill, etc" <ref name="Bradley Fikes">{{cite news|url=http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=8640|title=Greenpeace Thug Threatens Global Warming Skeptics “We know where you live”|last=Fikes|first=Bradley |date=April 4, 2010|publisher=www.nctimes.com|pages=1|language=Engish|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| ], writing for '']'' after it was revealed ] who had been choosen by the ] to head its enquiry into Climategate, actually had a leading role in a global warming campaign network called Globe International. This was quickly picked up by climate skeptic blogs. |
], writing for '']'' after it was revealed ] who had been choosen by the ] to head its enquiry into Climategate, actually had a leading role in a global warming campaign network called Globe International. This was quickly picked up by climate skeptic blogs.<ref name="Andrew Orlowski">{{cite news|url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/26/uea_oxburgh_statement/|title=Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties|last=Orlowski |first=Andrew |date=26 March 2010|publisher=The Register|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> With Bishop Hill writing "GLOBE – a vehicle for avoiding ]" <ref name="Andrew Montford">{{cite web|url=http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/3/24/globe-a-vehicle-for-avoiding-foi.html#comments|title=GLOBE – a vehicle for avoiding FoI|last=Montford|first=Andrew|date=March 24, 2010|publisher=bishophill|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| A post on the blog led to the resignation of ], the editor in chief of '']'' from the panel. In an interview with Chinese state radio when asked about the controversy, Campbell said that he believed nothing untoward had happened. The Guardian newspaper commented "The interview, posted on the Bishop Hill blog run by the climate sceptic Andrew Montford and shown on Channel 4 News, risked undermining Muir's claim that the inquiry team was impartial" <ref name="The Guardian">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk |
A post on the blog led to the resignation of ], the editor in chief of '']'' from the panel. In an interview with Chinese state radio when asked about the controversy, Campbell said that he believed nothing untoward had happened. The Guardian newspaper commented "The interview, posted on the Bishop Hill blog run by the climate sceptic Andrew Montford and shown on Channel 4 News, risked undermining Muir's claim that the inquiry team was impartial" <ref name="The Guardian">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| ==Comments and Criticism== | ==Comments and Criticism== | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
| Richard Littlemore writing on his ] said, "In a desperate effort to distract attention from the real issue, Steve McIntyre and one of his more loquacious acolytes (Bishop Hill) have renewed their attack on the fabled hockey stick" and finished his article with the question "Have you any legitimate criticism of all the other science that supports Mann's work? Any criticism at all?" <ref name="Richard Littlemore">{{cite web|url=http://www.desmogblog.com/this-is-not-a-hockey-stick|title=This is not a hockey Stick|last=Littlemore|first=Richard|date=13 August 08|publisher=www.desmogblog.com|language=English (US)|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> | Richard Littlemore writing on his ] said, "In a desperate effort to distract attention from the real issue, Steve McIntyre and one of his more loquacious acolytes (Bishop Hill) have renewed their attack on the fabled hockey stick" and finished his article with the question "Have you any legitimate criticism of all the other science that supports Mann's work? Any criticism at all?" <ref name="Richard Littlemore">{{cite web|url=http://www.desmogblog.com/this-is-not-a-hockey-stick|title=This is not a hockey Stick|last=Littlemore|first=Richard|date=13 August 08|publisher=www.desmogblog.com|language=English (US)|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| ] in his '']'' blog wrote "Fortunately the great Bishop Hill has been doing some digging" when the blog found out that George Marshall, founder and director of projects at the Climate Outreach and Information Network had been funded to the tune of £700,000 over two years by ]. |
] in his '']'' blog wrote "Fortunately the great Bishop Hill has been doing some digging" when the blog found out that George Marshall, founder and director of projects at the Climate Outreach and Information Network had been funded to the tune of £700,000 over two years by ].<ref name="The Telegraph">{{cite news|url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017912/climategate-how-they-all-squirmed/|title=Climategate: how they all squirmed|last=Delingpole|first=James|date=November 25, 2009|publisher=www.blogs.telegraph.co.uk|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> He has also commented on his personal blog saying, "Bishop Hill has unearthed a jaw-dropping critique of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report. His post’s so delightful there’s no need for embellishment" <ref name="James Delingpole">{{cite web|url=http://jamesdelingpole.com/blog/ipcc-fourth-assessment-report-is-rubbish-%E2%80%93-says-yet-another-expert-775/|title=IPCC Fourth Assessment Report is rubbish – says yet another expert|last=Delingpole|first=James|date=February 11, 2010|publisher=jamesdelingpole.com|accessdate=13 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| ] wrote on his ] blog of Bishop Hill, "let me say that he is a succinct and careful writer who has earned praise from many (including myself and Steve McIntyre)" <ref name="Anthony Watts">{{cite web|url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/22/bishop-hills-compendium-of-cru-email-issues/|title=Bishop Hill’s compendium of CRU email issues|last=Watts|first=Anthony|date=22 11 2009|publisher=wattsupwiththat.com|language=English (US)|accessdate=13 April 2010}}</ref> | ] wrote on his ] blog of Bishop Hill, "let me say that he is a succinct and careful writer who has earned praise from many (including myself and Steve McIntyre)" <ref name="Anthony Watts">{{cite web|url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/22/bishop-hills-compendium-of-cru-email-issues/|title=Bishop Hill’s compendium of CRU email issues|last=Watts|first=Anthony|date=22 11 2009|publisher=wattsupwiththat.com|language=English (US)|accessdate=13 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
| == References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 17 April 2010
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Type of site | Blog |
|---|---|
| Created by | Andrew Montford |
| URL | http://bishophill.squarespace.com/ |
Bishop Hill is blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion. The blog was founded on November 21, 2006. At first focusing on British politics, Montford, after following a link from a blog posted by Tim Worstall to Climate Audit changed the blog's focus to Climate Change from a skeptical viewpoint. Montford`s layperson's explanations of the Hockey Stick debate have received comment in the media, specifically his summaries of posts from Climate Audit which he called the "Caspar And The Jesus Paper"
Climate change advocacy
Roger Harrabin writing for the BBC on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the Climategate controversy published their findings said, sceptics on the website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up."
Bradly Fikes, a reporter for the North County Times wrote "The truth that the Greenpeace fanatics (and some at the New York Times) can’t process is that opposition to global warming alarmism is a decentralized guerrilla campaign against global warming extremism. There is no central command of large corporations directing anti-warmist blogs such as Watts Up With That?, or EUReferendum or Bishop Hill, etc"
Andrew Orlowski, writing for The Register after it was revealed Lord Oxburgh who had been choosen by the University of East Anglia to head its enquiry into Climategate, actually had a leading role in a global warming campaign network called Globe International. This was quickly picked up by climate skeptic blogs. With Bishop Hill writing "GLOBE – a vehicle for avoiding Freedom of information"
A post on the blog led to the resignation of Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature from the panel. In an interview with Chinese state radio when asked about the controversy, Campbell said that he believed nothing untoward had happened. The Guardian newspaper commented "The interview, posted on the Bishop Hill blog run by the climate sceptic Andrew Montford and shown on Channel 4 News, risked undermining Muir's claim that the inquiry team was impartial"
Comments and Criticism
Richard Littlemore writing on his DeSmogBlog said, "In a desperate effort to distract attention from the real issue, Steve McIntyre and one of his more loquacious acolytes (Bishop Hill) have renewed their attack on the fabled hockey stick" and finished his article with the question "Have you any legitimate criticism of all the other science that supports Mann's work? Any criticism at all?"
James Delingpole in his Telegraph blog wrote "Fortunately the great Bishop Hill has been doing some digging" when the blog found out that George Marshall, founder and director of projects at the Climate Outreach and Information Network had been funded to the tune of £700,000 over two years by DEFRA. He has also commented on his personal blog saying, "Bishop Hill has unearthed a jaw-dropping critique of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report. His post’s so delightful there’s no need for embellishment"
Anthony Watts wrote on his Watts Up With That blog of Bishop Hill, "let me say that he is a succinct and careful writer who has earned praise from many (including myself and Steve McIntyre)"
References
- ^ Montford, Andrew (August 11, 2008). "Caspar and the Jesus paper". bishophill.squarespace.com. Retrieved 14 April 2010. Cite error: The named reference "Andrew Montford" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- Ridley, Matt (3RD FEBRUARY 2010). "The global warming guerrillas". www.spectator.co.uk. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Harrabin, Roger (31 March 2010). "Climate science must be more open, say MPs". news.bbc.co.uk. p. 1. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
- Fikes, Bradley (April 4, 2010). "Greenpeace Thug Threatens Global Warming Skeptics "We know where you live"" (in Engish). www.nctimes.com. p. 1. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link) - Orlowski, Andrew (26 March 2010). "Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties". The Register. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
- Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - Littlemore, Richard (13 August 08). "This is not a hockey Stick" (in English (US)). www.desmogblog.com. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link) - Delingpole, James (November 25, 2009). "Climategate: how they all squirmed". www.blogs.telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
- Delingpole, James (February 11, 2010). "IPCC Fourth Assessment Report is rubbish – says yet another expert". jamesdelingpole.com. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- Watts, Anthony (22 11 2009). "Bishop Hill's compendium of CRU email issues" (in English (US)). wattsupwiththat.com. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)