| Revision as of 23:30, 18 January 2006 editPiedras grandes (talk | contribs)296 edits →Blocked: I'm obviously not one of them← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:38, 18 January 2006 edit undoPiedras grandes (talk | contribs)296 edits nevermindNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| '''''You have been ]''''' in accordance with ] for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from ].<br> | '''''You have been ]''''' in accordance with ] for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from ].<br> | ||
| |} ]<sup>]</sup> 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |} ]<sup>]</sup> 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock}} | <s><nowiki>{{unblock}}</nowiki></s> | ||
| I haven't done anything remotely vandal-like--] 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | I haven't done anything remotely vandal-like--] 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 18 January 2006
Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up their violation of the WP:3RR rule here, here, and here do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--Piedras grandes 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- The three reverts that you linked to were perfomed on more than one article, thus it doesn't breach the WP:3RR rule. Plus the rule states more than 3 reverts. - Akamad 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- Can you please state why you believe you have been unfairly blocked so we can look into your complaints. Thanks - Akamad 05:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters
Hi. I noticed that you voted both to support and oppose this user's RFA. Can you clarify which of your votes you intended? Thanks! --Syrthiss 15:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I've almost done that a few times as well. :) --Syrthiss 16:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Plant sexuality
I am confused by your addition of "Speedy" and "Hoax" tags to this article. Could you please explain your rationale for doing so? Thanks. Guettarda 19:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Huh? Did you read the article? Guettarda 19:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Please stop
You have made a large number of edits to articles and the talk pages of articles, which are all the addition of templates which do not exist. What are you trying to do? Perhaps I can help you. KillerChihuahua 19:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Please use talk pages for constructive comments, not random criticism by adding a BAD label. That is not helpful or constructive. KillerChihuahua 20:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
KillerChihuahua is right; this needs to stop. Edits like this, putting your "good" template on the top of an article, are a bad idea. The developers are working on a feature called "article validation" that will allow multiple voices to weigh in on article quality in a systematic manner. Until then, coming up with your own scheme is inappropriate. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Templates
Please do not use the Good and Bad templates. Good is duplication of effort with the Good article campaign; Bad is simply useless because it is criticism without details - in other words, non-helpful criticism. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks much! KillerChihuahua 21:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
George W. Bush
Please don't delete links to related articles; they are all relevant. Thanks. Katefan0/mrp 03:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
"Not a stub"
Why did you add the text "not a stub' to Abas, son of Lynceus? If you don't think an article is a stub, then you should remove the stub template. Also, why did you add a 'Welcome' template to the bottom of my talk page when I've already been an editor for some time? Did you mean to? BillC 18:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Warning
Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KillerChihuahua 22:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Do NOT keep adding this template spam. It is not helpful nor constructive. KillerChihuahua 23:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
|
You have been blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. |
KillerChihuahua 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock}}
I haven't done anything remotely vandal-like--Piedras grandes 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)