| Revision as of 00:53, 19 January 2006 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,644 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:11, 19 January 2006 edit undoPiedras grandes (talk | contribs)296 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| € | |||
| Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up '''their''' violation of the ] rule , , and do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--] 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :The three reverts that you linked to were perfomed on more than one article, thus it doesn't breach the ] rule. Plus the rule states ''more'' than 3 reverts. - ] 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Can you please state why you believe you have been unfairly blocked so we can look into your complaints. Thanks - ] 05:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. I noticed that you voted both to support and oppose this user's RFA. Can you clarify which of your votes you intended? Thanks! --] 15:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Not a problem. I've almost done that a few times as well. :) --] 16:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I am confused by your addition of "Speedy" and "Hoax" tags to this article. Could you please explain your rationale for doing so? Thanks. ] 19:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Huh? Did you read the article? ] 19:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please stop== | |||
| You have made a large number of edits to articles and the talk pages of articles, which are all the addition of templates which ''do not exist''. What are you trying to do? Perhaps I can help you. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please use talk pages for constructive comments, not random criticism by adding a BAD label. That is not helpful or constructive. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| KillerChihuahua is right; this needs to stop. Edits like , putting your "good" template on the top of an article, are a bad idea. The developers are working on a feature called "article validation" that will allow multiple voices to weigh in on article quality in a systematic manner. Until then, coming up with your own scheme is inappropriate. —] (]) 20:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Templates== | |||
| Please do not use the Good and Bad templates. Good is duplication of effort with the Good article campaign; Bad is simply useless because it is criticism without details - in other words, non-helpful criticism. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on ]. Thanks much! ]<sup>]</sup> 21:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please don't delete links to related articles; they are all relevant. Thanks. ]<sup>]</sup>/<small>]</small> 03:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "Not a stub" == | |||
| Why did you add the text "not a stub' to ]? If you don't think an article is a stub, then you should remove the stub template. Also, why did you add a 'Welcome' template to the bottom of my talk page when I've already been an editor for some time? Did you mean to? ] 18:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Warning== | |||
| Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered ]. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. Thank you. <!-- {{test2}} (second level warning) --> ]<sup>]</sup> 22:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Do NOT keep adding this template spam. It is not helpful nor constructive. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" id="block" style="background: #ffe1a7; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.1em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''''You have been ]''''' in accordance with ] for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from ].<br> | |||
| |} ]<sup>]</sup> 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <s><nowiki>{{unblock}}</nowiki></s> | |||
| I haven't done anything remotely vandal-like--] 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I was scandalized when you identified one of my articles as bad and placed your self-devised template there. Please learn to respect the rules and then come back to editing with a more mature attitude. --] | ] 00:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yes, you have. You created templates which you proceeded to add, willy-nilly, to several hundred articles. You have placed Welcome messages on article talk pages and Afd pages. Your Good template is unecessary duplication of the Good article campaign; your Bad article is useless, as it criticises without being constructive; and your Sm (small) template is duplication with stubs. You have changed stubs incorrectly, in one case from a geo-stub to bio-stub, and Canada-poli-stub changed to sports-stub. You have not responded to pleas to stop this disruptive behavior which several people have left here on your talk page. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I'm not causing spite to anyone, it's a support vote, it's spite-free<!--tell you in person in 3 hours-->--] 23:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:11, 19 January 2006
€