| Revision as of 23:02, 26 April 2010 editYilloslime (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,467 edits →External links: +{{reflist}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:05, 26 April 2010 edit undoChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits rescuing refNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''Bishop Hill''' is a widely-read ] operated by ], author of '']''.<ref name="Webster_2010-03-23_Times" |
'''Bishop Hill''' is a widely-read ] operated by ], author of '']''.<ref name="Webster_2010-03-23_Times">{{cite web | ||
| | url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7071751.ece | |||
| | title = Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, ‘has a conflict of interest’ | |||
| | last = Webster | |||
| | first = Ben | |||
| | authorlink = | |||
| | coauthors = | |||
| | work = ] | |||
| | publisher = ] | |||
| | date = 2010-03-23 | |||
| | format = | |||
| | language= | |||
| | doi = | |||
| | accessdate = 2010-04-22 | |||
| | archiveurl = | |||
| | archivedate = | |||
| | quote = Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a “direct financial interest in the outcome” of his inquiry. | |||
| }}</ref> | |||
| A post on the blog led to the resignation of ], the editor in chief of '']'' from the Independent Climate Change Email Review headed by Sir Muir Russell.{{Specify|date=April 2010}}<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> | A post on the blog led to the resignation of ], the editor in chief of '']'' from the Independent Climate Change Email Review headed by Sir Muir Russell.{{Specify|date=April 2010}}<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 23:05, 26 April 2010
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged into The Hockey Stick Illusion. (Discuss) Proposed since April 2010. |
| An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion. Find sources: "Bishop Hill" blog – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FBishop+Hill+%28blog%29%5D%5DAFD |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Type of site | Blog |
|---|---|
| Created by | Andrew Montford |
| URL | http://bishophill.squarespace.com/ |
Bishop Hill is a widely-read blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion.
A post on the blog led to the resignation of Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature from the Independent Climate Change Email Review headed by Sir Muir Russell.
External links
References
- Webster, Ben (2010-03-23). "Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, 'has a conflict of interest'". timesonline.co.uk. The Times. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a "direct financial interest in the outcome" of his inquiry.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help)