| Revision as of 00:10, 27 April 2010 editChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits →Climate Audit: - good point, G← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:09, 27 April 2010 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →Climate Audit: Keep as redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| * '''Comment''' - since the article was merged into ] a year ago, we can't delete this article ''alone'' without deleting both articles. So either the parent article needs to be added here, or this needs to be closed on procedural grounds. This appears to be a "Request for de-merging" (see ]) and not a real deletion nom, and is, IMO, outside the scope of AFD. ] (]) 23:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | * '''Comment''' - since the article was merged into ] a year ago, we can't delete this article ''alone'' without deleting both articles. So either the parent article needs to be added here, or this needs to be closed on procedural grounds. This appears to be a "Request for de-merging" (see ]) and not a real deletion nom, and is, IMO, outside the scope of AFD. ] (]) 23:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *:I think you have a point. I thought there was something not quite right about this AfD - I couldn't put my finger on it, but I was considering suggesting that it should go to ] instead. -- ] (]) 00:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | *:I think you have a point. I thought there was something not quite right about this AfD - I couldn't put my finger on it, but I was considering suggesting that it should go to ] instead. -- ] (]) 00:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep as redirect''' and slap nominator with a trout. ] (]) 01:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:09, 27 April 2010
Climate Audit
AfDs for this article:- Climate Audit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We need to take this through an afd, since some people insist the content should be deleted. I don't see any agreement on that. Nsaa (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- NB: After the AFD-request the page has been altered again. The AFD is about this version, not the current one as of 2010-04-10T22:30. Nsaa (talk) 22:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- NB: Well, the above is a trifle disingenuous. In fact the article was restored to the version that has been stable for a year now William M. Connolley (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, no deletion, no redirect. This is a well sourced article and adheres to Misplaced Pages:WEB and WP:GNG. Nsaa (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep no deletion, no redirect. Both are notable enough for their own articles mark nutley (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- redirect as is now William M. Connolley (talk) 20:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- redirect, weakly favor: I generally prefer to lump rather than split. Pete Tillman (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- redirect as before. Climate Audit gains its notability because Stephen McIntyre writes it, and McI is notable because of his involvement in the Hockey stick controversy... it has no notability by itself. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 21:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Article's "full state" that is being deliberated can be found here, as opposed to the current redirect. --Darkwind (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Redirect. It seems apparent that Climate Audit has no notability independent of its sole proprietor. It might be different if it was a group blog, but it's not. Compare the much more widely read The Daily Dish, which redirects to its author, Andrew Sullivan. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - since the article was merged into Stephen McIntyre a year ago, we can't delete this article alone without deleting both articles. So either the parent article needs to be added here, or this needs to be closed on procedural grounds. This appears to be a "Request for de-merging" (see here) and not a real deletion nom, and is, IMO, outside the scope of AFD. Guettarda (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think you have a point. I thought there was something not quite right about this AfD - I couldn't put my finger on it, but I was considering suggesting that it should go to Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion instead. -- ChrisO (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep as redirect and slap nominator with a trout. Hipocrite (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)