| Revision as of 11:14, 30 April 2010 editKimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,610 edits Reverted to revision 359212186 by Electroshoxcure; rv There you are wrong - the dispute over sources has absolutely diddly-squat to do with an AfD. Read the objections!. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:04, 3 May 2010 edit undoNsaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,851 edits Please go through each source and point why they're not covering what this text says. You are removing BBC for c.s.Next edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| }}</ref><ref>], "", '']'', 3 February 2010.</ref> | }}</ref><ref>], "", '']'', 3 February 2010.</ref> | ||
| ], the editor in chief of '']'' |
], the editor in chief of '']'' resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after Bishop Hill (and ]) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup.{{Specify|date=April 2010}}<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> ], writing for ], noted that the blog was one of several to initially report the story that ] had been choosen by the ] to head its enquiry into the ].<ref name="Andrew Orlowski">{{cite news|url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/26/uea_oxburgh_statement/|title=Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties|last=Orlowski |first=Andrew |date=26th March 2010|publisher=The Register|language=English|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> The ] noted that the blog had criticised the ] of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on its investigation into the controversy.<ref>Harrabin, Roger, "", '']'', 31 March 2010.</ref> '']'' reported that Dr. Paul Dennis, a climate scientist, had posted an account on the blog of his interview with the police concerning their investigation into the unauthorized release of the emails from the ].<ref>'']'', "", 5 February 2010.</ref> | ||
| ==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 3 May 2010
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Type of site | Blog |
|---|---|
| Created by | Andrew Montford |
| URL | http://bishophill.squarespace.com/ |
Bishop Hill is a blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion.
Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after Bishop Hill (and Channel 4) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup. Andrew Orlowski, writing for The Register, noted that the blog was one of several to initially report the story that Lord Oxburgh had been choosen by the University of East Anglia to head its enquiry into the Climatic Research Unit email controversy. The BBC noted that the blog had criticised the findings of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on its investigation into the controversy. The Daily Mail reported that Dr. Paul Dennis, a climate scientist, had posted an account on the blog of his interview with the police concerning their investigation into the unauthorized release of the emails from the Climatic Research Unit.
External links
References
- Webster, Ben (2010-03-23). "Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, 'has a conflict of interest'". timesonline.co.uk. The Times. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a "direct financial interest in the outcome" of his inquiry.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - Matt Ridley, "The global warming guerrillas", The Spectator, 3 February 2010.
- Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - Orlowski, Andrew (26th March 2010). "Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties". The Register. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Harrabin, Roger, "Climate science must be more open, say MPs", BBC News, 31 March 2010.
- The Daily Mail, "Police question global warming 'sceptic' scientist over 'Climategate' email leak", 5 February 2010.