Misplaced Pages

Talk:Anti-Catholicism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:08, 2 May 2010 editStudent7 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers72,738 edits Rationalizing anti-catholicism?: Good idea?← Previous edit Revision as of 20:13, 2 May 2010 edit undoSmitty1337 (talk | contribs)838 edits Rationalizing anti-catholicismNext edit →
Line 27: Line 27:


But rationalizing anti-Catholicism should not be the task of this article IMO. ] (]) 20:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC) But rationalizing anti-Catholicism should not be the task of this article IMO. ] (]) 20:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
: "Reason" "motivation" and "justification" are not synonims, that sentence passes no judgement it meerly states why. It does not say its justified as a result of the reasoning. ] (]) 20:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:13, 2 May 2010

WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconChristianity: Catholicism C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Hitler a Catholic

I think the fact that Hitler was himself a Catholic does indeed matter, because (1st) most people, as we have seen, do not believe it even when they're told, and (2nd) because it is a very rare phenomenon in history that the Church was so hatefully suppressed by people who were her own members (the same is true for Goebbels).

I promised to give a source for the fact that Hitler was a Catholic, and not „erstwhile“ but until his death. The German original text from Albert Speer's biography: Speer, Albert: Erinnerungen, Verlag Ullstein, Frankfurt a.M./Berlin, 1969, page 109 goes as follows.

Als Hitler etwa 1937 davon hörte, daß auf Betreiben der Partei und der SS zahllose seiner Anhänger aus der Kirche ausgetreten seien, weil sich diese halsstarrig Hitlers Absichten widersetzte, befahl er aus Gründen der Opportunität, daß seine wichtigsten Mitarbeiter, vor allem aber Göring und Goebbels, weiter der Kirche anzugehören hätten. Auch er würde Mitglied der katholischen Kirche bleiben, obwohl er keine innere Bindung zu ihr habe. Er blieb es bis zu seinem Selbstmord.

If you search the quote in the English translation, you may find it towards the end of the 7th chapter. I do not have the translation, so I made my own.

When Hitler heard in about 1937 that, with the Party’s and the SS’s support, countless of his followers had secedered from the Church, because the latter was headstrongly resisting to his intentions, he commanded for reasons of opportunity that his most important co-operators, and most notably Göring and Goebbels, cease not to belong to the Church. He would himself stay a member of the Catholic Church as well, even though he said he had no inner connection with her. he stayed it until his suicide. Rudefuss (talk) 13:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

What is the relevance to anti-catholicism? If as you say most people do not believe it then its not creating the phenomena. It may be relevant on other articles but not here --Snowded 14:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
transl. "Is Hitler a Christian?"
@Snowded, you are right that it has indeed little relevance to this lemma. But, it seems to be a topic, or should I say a mantra, popular among ... to bash the catholic church. Anyway, even the claim itself seems to be wrong as recent research by historian Michael Hesemann, supported by the Pave the Way Foundation, in archives of years 1930-33 has shown that already 3 years before Hitler came to power nazi party members were indeed excommunicated, „any Catholic who joined the Nazi party, wore the uniform or flew the swastika flag would no longer be able to receive the sacraments.“. In addition, already a 1931 booklet by Capuchin Ingbert Naab clearly stated that Hitler and nazi ideology was anti-christian. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Well, it is indeed relevant, as I pointed out. But if you think it's "bashing Catholicism", then just leave it out. I consider that a very strange oppinion, however. And please know that I'm a believer in the Catholic Church myself.Rudefuss (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Although the Hitler angle is immaterial, Anti-Catholicism also includes a component which believes that the Catholic Church stood idly during the Holocaust, and that some high ranking clerics assisted Nazis out of Europe after the war. I am not claiming these allegations to be true, just that they are the basis of some Anti-Catholic sentiment.155.84.57.253 (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Rationalizing anti-catholicism

A sentence reads "This form of anti-Catholicism has its roots in ... the Sack of Constantinople by Catholic forces from Western Europe in the Fourth Crusade in 1204." Is it the purpose of this article to justify anti-catholicism? If so, nearly all of it can be justified, I am sure. The forces sent by the pope were to Jerusalem in the fourth crusade. Most of the leaders wound up excommunicated by the time they got to Constantinople. Read as a story, by someone who doesn't enjoy harboring grudges, it actually reads pretty funny. Nonetheless, crusaders, who were always supposed to be elsewhere, did wind up sacking Constantinople. And yes, they were Catholic. They were also European, white, adults between the ages of ..., over 4 feet tall, etc. But suggesting that their primary attribute was "Catholic" is pretty droll, if you read the story. "Too smart for their own good," or "not too smart" would be a better description. After 800 years, it's still pretty hard figuring out which one fits best.

But rationalizing anti-Catholicism should not be the task of this article IMO. Student7 (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

"Reason" "motivation" and "justification" are not synonims, that sentence passes no judgement it meerly states why. It does not say its justified as a result of the reasoning. Smitty1337 (talk) 20:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Categories: