Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/James Combs: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:53, 20 January 2006 editHarvestdancer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,184 editsm →[]: - removed accidental double vote← Previous edit Revision as of 19:08, 20 January 2006 edit undoHall Monitor (talk | contribs)20,413 edits simmered down lobster, bisque anyone?Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Delete''' - what criterion for notability does this person satisfy? Being an editor of a magazine? Uh, no. --] 11:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - what criterion for notability does this person satisfy? Being an editor of a magazine? Uh, no. --] 11:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 19:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 19:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' This article was created by Jason Gastrich to promote his school as a mainstream institution. This is only one of around 10 articles he created promoting his religion/degree/school. See ]. --Q *'''Delete''' This article was created by Jason Gastrich to promote his school as a mainstream institution. This is only one of around 10 articles he created promoting his religion/degree/school. See ]. --Q {{unsigned2|19:54, 18 January 2006|207.200.116.198}}
* '''Delete''' more cruft from {{user|Jason Gastrich}} (check those contribs, people) ] <sup>]]</sup>/<sub>]]</sub> ] '']'' 23:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' more cruft from {{user|Jason Gastrich}} (check those contribs, people) ] <sup>]]</sup>/<sub>]]</sub> ] '']'' 23:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' this agreeing with JzG. ] 23:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' this agreeing with JzG. ] 23:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 30: Line 30:
*'''Weak keep.''' Notability is limited, but it's there; this isn't some guy writing about Joe Average for the hell of it. Again, not liking the institution has little bearing on the rest of it. ] 10:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Weak keep.''' Notability is limited, but it's there; this isn't some guy writing about Joe Average for the hell of it. Again, not liking the institution has little bearing on the rest of it. ] 10:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Tired of this. Too much effort deleting and not enough creating or improving. --] 12:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Tired of this. Too much effort deleting and not enough creating or improving. --] 12:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Unashamed keep''' Per reasons above. The guy has been working with this for 60 years! The guy's obviously notable and he needs an article. Too many are taking out more than they give. - 13:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC) ] <sup>] *'''Unashamed keep''' Per reasons above. The guy has been working with this for 60 years! The guy's obviously notable and he needs an article. Too many are taking out more than they give. - 13:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC) ] <sup>]
*'''Strong Keep''' This is a perfectly viable encyclopedia article on a public institution that could very well be the subject of someone's research in the future. In such an event, wikipedia would come in handy. That is what wikipedia is for. I haven't heard a single good argument to why this should be deleted. ] 15:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Strong Keep''' This is a perfectly viable encyclopedia article on a public institution that could very well be the subject of someone's research in the future. In such an event, wikipedia would come in handy. That is what wikipedia is for. I haven't heard a single good argument to why this should be deleted. ] 15:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete:''' per nom. ] 16:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete:''' per nom. ] 16:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:08, 20 January 2006

James Combs

Minor figure "notable" mainly as the provost of a diploma mill. Delete. A.J.A. 05:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Well documented? There no citations in the body of the article. And Louisiana Baptist University is not well known by any stretch.
  • Merge if he's so incredibly notable, into the page for the university...there is not enough notability to warrant an entire article on this guy. bcatt 22:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)