Bishop Hill (blog): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:35, 5 May 2010 editDave souza (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators48,669 edits remove WP:COATRACK attack on individual and on inauiry, not info about the blog← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:10, 5 May 2010 edit undoChrisO~enwiki (talk \| contribs)43,032 edits Might as well redirect now, there's nothing here that isn't already in Andrew Montford Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
		⚫	#REDIRECT ]
	{{multiple issues\|orphan =April 2010\|notability =April 2010\|POV =April 2010}}
	{{Infobox website
	\| name = Bishop Hill
	\| logo =
	\| screenshot =
	\| collapsible =
	\| collapsetext =
	\| caption =
	\| url = http://bishophill.squarespace.com/
	\| alexa =
	\| commercial =
	\| type = ]
	\| language =
	\| registration =
	\| owner =
⚫	~~\| author =~~ ]
	\| launch date = November 21, 2006
	\| current status =
	\| revenue =
	\| slogan = A dissentient afflicted with the malady of thought
	\| content license =
	}}

	'''Bishop Hill''' is a ] operated by ], author of '']''.<ref name="Webster_2010-03-23_Times">{{cite web
	\| url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7071751.ece
	\| title = Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, ‘has a conflict of interest’
	\| last = Webster
	\| first = Ben
	\| authorlink =
	\| coauthors =
	\| work = ]
	\| publisher = ]
	\| date = 2010-03-23
	\| format =
	\| language=
	\| doi =
	\| accessdate = 2010-04-22
	\| archiveurl =
	\| archivedate =
	\| quote = Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a “direct financial interest in the outcome” of his inquiry.
	}}</ref><ref>], "", '']'', 3 February 2010.</ref>

	==External links==
	*

	]
	]
	]

	]

	==References==
	{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 07:10, 5 May 2010

Redirect to:

Andrew Montford