Revision as of 13:43, 19 May 2010 editRedtigerxyz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,040 edits →Bihari lal: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bihari lal← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:19, 21 May 2010 edit undoRegentsPark (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,689 edits →Talk:Punjab_(India)#Requested_move: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Comments are welcome. Proposed move: Āyurveda -> Ayurveda (old name) --] <sup> ] </sup> 13:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC) | Comments are welcome. Proposed move: Āyurveda -> Ayurveda (old name) --] <sup> ] </sup> 13:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
FYI. --] (]) 14:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:19, 21 May 2010
Do you need the Indic name(s) of something or somebody? Post a request for it.
Shortcuts | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
World Classical Tamil Conference 2010
Hope the members involved in improving the projects related to India can contribute a lot to this article about the upcoming World Tamil Conference. I need your help improving the article guys. --Ben (talk) 09:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
New article Battle of Attock needs appropriate category!
Hi WikiProject India, the above article should probably be categorized within WikiProject India, however I am not sure which category it would best fit under so thought I would leave it to those more experienced with this project to have a look at the article and add the appropriate project banner to the talk page. Thanks for your time! ialsoagree (talk) 02:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Bihari lal
Hello, could an Indian editor please review the above article and assist in finding sources? It looks like it's primarily suffering from systemic bias. Sincerely, Blurpeace 05:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is not Systemic bias, the problem is its notability. It is a speedy-delete. I found no RS on the net about this Bihari lal. I searched for "Bejing common games in 2008", which seem non-notable or a hoax. --Redtigerxyz 16:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Language template question
in the template for indian state languages, Manipuri is shown, but the languages more correct name is Meitei, or Meitei-lon, and the article on this language is titled Meitei language. should the template be changed to reflect this, or perhaps the common name put in parenthesis after the official name? i would guess template changes should be discussed before being made, even if they seem routine.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Have replied there too. The official list of the Indian constitution lists it as Manipuri. --Redtigerxyz 16:18, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Let's keep the discussion at Template talk:Languages of India. Please add your comments at the template talk. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz 16:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Have replied there too. The official list of the Indian constitution lists it as Manipuri. --Redtigerxyz 16:18, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Āyurveda#Requested_move
Comments are welcome. Proposed move: Āyurveda -> Ayurveda (old name) --Redtigerxyz 13:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Punjab_(India)#Requested_move
FYI. --RegentsPark (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Categories: