| Revision as of 05:54, 28 May 2010 editBruceSwanson (talk | contribs)974 edits revised statement.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:10, 28 May 2010 edit undoBruceSwanson (talk | contribs)974 edits this particularNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Since many of my current edits deal with ] I should probably point out that as a ] in excellent health whose only recreational drugs are found in ], ], and an occasional ], my viewpoint is merely that of an incredulous bystander, not someone active in or threatened by |
Since many of my current edits deal with ] I should probably point out that as a ] in excellent health whose only recreational drugs are found in ], ], and an occasional ], my viewpoint is merely that of an incredulous bystander, not someone active in or threatened by this particular carnival of lies passing through our time. | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 28 May 2010
The orthodox HIV/AIDS hypothesis as it is found in Misplaced Pages articles and Talk pages cannot be maintained in detail by editors using their real names. That's because it is so fundamentally dishonest that anyone trying to validate its logic and assumptions would necessarily damage their personal and professional reputation. However, the existence of The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis, of which I am a layman signatory, would seem to indicate that AIDS-dissident viewpoints can be maintained by people using their real names. I recommend three simple rules to guide their edits:
| “ | All Misplaced Pages articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. This is non-negotiable and expected of all articles and all editors. | ” |
and
| “ | Primary sources should not be cited in support of a conclusion that is not clearly made by the authors or by reliable secondary sources | ” |
and
| “ | Primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Misplaced Pages, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source can be used only to make descriptive statements that can be verified by any educated person without specialist knowledge. | ” |
Since many of my current edits deal with HIV/AIDS I should probably point out that as a heterosexual in excellent health whose only recreational drugs are found in wine, beer, and an occasional cigar, my viewpoint is merely that of an incredulous bystander, not someone active in or threatened by this particular carnival of lies passing through our time.