Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:05, 3 June 2010 editDuffbeerforme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,138 edits delete← Previous edit Revision as of 02:06, 9 June 2010 edit undoRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits Relisting debateNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sika redem}}</ul></div> <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sika redem}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Sika redem}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) :{{la|Sika redem}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}})
:({{Find sources|Sika redem}}) :({{Find sources|Sika redem}})
Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading ] makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although ] may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading ] makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although ] may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Borderline keep''', with a major ] rewrite needed. Criterion #5 of ] is "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." They've got one album and one EP to an indie record label (]) that sort of qualifies. That alone I'd say wasn't quite enough, but adding the reviews from Kerrang and Rocksound, the profile in NME and the airplay on Radio 1, I think it scrapes it by the narrowest of margins. ] (]) 17:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Borderline keep''', with a major ] rewrite needed. Criterion #5 of ] is "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." They've got one album and one EP to an indie record label (]) that sort of qualifies. That alone I'd say wasn't quite enough, but adding the reviews from Kerrang and Rocksound, the profile in NME and the airplay on Radio 1, I think it scrapes it by the narrowest of margins. ] (]) 17:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' only the album was on ] (and they don't look that good a label for ]), the ep was on The Communion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. ] (]) 11:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete''' only the album was on ] (and they don't look that good a label for ]), the ep was on The Communion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. ] (]) 11:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 02:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->]

Revision as of 02:06, 9 June 2010

Sika redem

AfDs for this article:
Sika redem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading WP:MUSIC makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although Undergroove Records may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. Narutolovehinata5 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Categories: