| Revision as of 07:49, 10 June 2010 editJafeluv (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,409 edits revert; see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Snottywong/userboxes/ARSbackfire← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:15, 11 June 2010 edit undoJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits →Wendy Swanscombe: closeNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 02:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Wendy Swanscombe}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wendy Swanscombe}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | :{{la|Wendy Swanscombe}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wendy Swanscombe}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. As I said in the prod, no evidence that this is anything other than a house pseudonym for the Nexus porno imprint. ] (]) 20:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. As I said in the prod, no evidence that this is anything other than a house pseudonym for the Nexus porno imprint. ] (]) 20:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - No sources exist to establish notability. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - No sources exist to establish notability. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 02:15, 11 June 2010
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg 02:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Wendy Swanscombe
- Wendy Swanscombe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another target of our newest(?) serial deprodder; prod rationale was "Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person". In any event, I can find no substantive treatment of this perhaps-living person in reliable, independent sources, nor evidence that any of the criteria of WP:AUTHOR are satisfied. Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Template:ARSnote
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Well known and prolific author has 66 hits on Gbooks . Inniverse (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: zero hits on google news archive. Six books on amazon, only one review ever posted by a reader. The books do exist (you can preview one on google books -- random quote, page 132, "But another orgasm was evidently being brewed in another pair of fine hairy balls"), but commentary and coverage from the outside world does not.--Milowent (talk) 17:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. As I said in the prod, no evidence that this is anything other than a house pseudonym for the Nexus porno imprint. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - No sources exist to establish notability. Fails WP:AUTHOR. SnottyWong talk 23:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.