| Revision as of 20:34, 13 June 2010 view source24.9.239.115 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:38, 13 June 2010 view source Ketsuekigata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers1,905 edits added citation needed tag, who tagNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Widely reported examples of false accusations of rape include those of ], ], ], ] and ], ], ] and ].<ref>, ''New York Post'', Sept. 18, 2009</ref> | Widely reported examples of false accusations of rape include those of ], ], ], ] and ], ], ] and ].<ref>, ''New York Post'', Sept. 18, 2009</ref> | ||
| A 2008 study about interpersonal relationship problems concluded in extreme cases, women (or men) may use the false accusation of rape to get revenge at their ex spouse, especially in cases in which one person receives more benefits in a divorce. Experts agree that these findings are likely, however are uncommon, as practical considerations are taken into account, such as the accuser being convicted of perjury. |
A 2008 study about interpersonal relationship problems concluded in extreme cases, women (or men) may use the false accusation of rape to get revenge at their ex spouse, especially in cases in which one person receives more benefits in a divorce. Experts{{who}} agree that these findings are likely, however are uncommon, as practical considerations are taken into account, such as the accuser being convicted of perjury.{{fact}} | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| *] | *] | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 13 June 2010
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged with Rape. (Discuss) Proposed since November 2009. |
 | Template:Wikify is deprecated. Please use a more specific cleanup template as listed in the documentation. |
The extents of false reporting and false accusations of rape are disputed. A study from the UK found that of the approximately 14,500 cases of rape reported in 2005/2006 9% were classified as false allegations. The journalist Dick Haws discusses cases in which figures on false reporting used by journalists have ranged from 2% to 50% depending on their sources:
"... one explanation for such a wide range in the statistics might simply be that they come from different studies of different populations... But there's also a strong political tilt to the debate. A low number would undercut a belief about rape as being as old as the story of Joseph and Potiphar's wife: that some women, out of shame or vengeance ... claim that their consensual encounters or rebuffed advances were rapes. If the number is high, on the other hand, advocates for women who have been raped worry it may also taint the credibility of the genuine victims of sexual assault."
Michelle J. Anderson of the Villanova University School of Law states: "As a scientific matter, the frequency of false rape complaints to police or other legal authorities remains unknown." The FBI's 1996 Uniform Crime Report states that 8% of reports of forcible rape were determined to be unfounded upon investigation, but that percentage does not include cases where an accuser fails or refuses to cooperate in an investigation or drops the charges. A British study using a similar methodology that does not include the accusers who drop out of the justice process found a false reporting rate of 8% as well. DiCanio (1993) states that while researchers and prosecutors do not agree on the exact percentage of false allegations, they generally agree on a range of two to eight percent.
Criticism of Dr. Kanin's report include Dr. David Lisak, an associate professor of psychology and director of the Men’s Sexual Trauma Research Project at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. In the September/October 2007 issue of the Sexual Assault Report he states “Kanin’s 1994 article on false allegations is a provocative opinion piece, but it is not a scientific study of the issue of false reporting of rape. It certainly should never be used to assert a scientific foundation for the frequency of false allegations.” He further states “ simply reiterates the opinions of the police officers who concluded that the cases in question were ‘false allegations.’” Lasik cites page 13 of Investigating Sexual Assaults from the International Association of Chiefs of Police which says polygraph tests for sexual assault victims are contraindicated in the investigation process and that their use is “based on the misperception that a significant percentage of sexual assault reports are false,”. Lasik goes on that “It is noteworthy that the police department from which Kanin derived his data used or threatened to use the polygraph in every case… The fact that it was the standard procedure of this department provides a window on the biases of the officers who conducted the rape investigations, biases that were then echoed in Kanin’s unchallenged reporting of their findings.”
A 2006 paper by N.S. Rumney in the Cambridge Law Journal provided an exhaustive account of studies of false reporting in the USA, New Zealand and the UK..
Rumney notes that early researchers tended to accept uncritically Freudian theories which purported to explain the prevalence of false allegations, while in more recent literature there has been "a lack of critical analysis of those who claim a low false reporting rate and the uncritical adoption of unreliable research findings" (p. 157). Rumney concludes that "as a consequence of such deficiencies within legal scholarship, factual claims have been repeatedly made that have only limited empirical support. This suggests widespread analytical failure on the part of legal scholarship and requires an acknowledgment of the weakness of assumptions that have been constructed on unreliable research evidence."
Taylor (1987) wrote that "suspicion and disbelief of women who charge men with rape have for centuries had a stranglehold on laws nominally designed to protect women against rape. As a result, many women did not report or prosecute rapes because the process was so often humiliating."
Widely reported examples of false accusations of rape include those of Mabel Hallam, Victoria Price and Ruby Bates, Phil Collins, Gary Dotson and Cathleen Crowell Webb, Tawana Brawley, Crystal Gail Mangum and Danmell Ndonye.
A 2008 study about interpersonal relationship problems concluded in extreme cases, women (or men) may use the false accusation of rape to get revenge at their ex spouse, especially in cases in which one person receives more benefits in a divorce. Experts agree that these findings are likely, however are uncommon, as practical considerations are taken into account, such as the accuser being convicted of perjury.
See also
References
- Cybulska B (2007). "Sexual assault: key issues". J R Soc Med. 100 (7): 321–4. doi:10.1258/jrsm.100.7.321. PMID 17606752.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - The Elusive Numbers on False Rape November/December 1997
- The Legacy of the Prompt Complaint Requirement, Corroboration Requirement, and Cautionary Instructions on Campus Sexual Assault Forthcoming
- Crime Index Offenses Reported 1996
- A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases Home Office Research - February 2005
- DiCanio, M. (1993). The encyclopedia of violence : origins, attitudes, consequences. New York : Facts on File
- Rumney, N.S., "False Allegations of Rape", Cambridge Law Journal, 65, March, 2006, pp.128-158
- Taylor, J. Rape and women's credibility: Problems of recantations and false accusations echoed in the case of Cathleen Crowell Webb and Gary Dotson. Harvard Women's Law Journal (now Harvard Journal of Law & Gender), 1987, volume 10, page 59.
- Twisted motive behind rape story, New York Post, Sept. 18, 2009