| Revision as of 03:13, 23 June 2010 editElockid (talk | contribs)42,430 edits archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:04, 8 January 2012 edit undoDoc9871 (talk | contribs)23,298 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|SkagitRiverQueen}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIarchive notice|SkagitRiverQueen}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| {{SPI case status}} | |||
| =====<big>08 January 2012</big>===== | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Lhb1239}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| After a recent failed edit warring report against SRQ's favorite harassment target {{user|DocOfSoc}}, it was demonstrated that this account has followed this editor to four different articles: ], ], ] and ] (on the last one for a one-off edit made simply to revert an EL that DocOfSoc had been trying to include). This editor's signature is a direct copy of that of {{user|Bwilkins}}, and when they were reminded of this they rebuked Bwilkins (an admin at least formerly respected by SRQ as far as admins go) with chillingly familiar language for many that are familiar with SRQ. The fact that their first edits, and most recently created article (]) center around the exact same area of the state of Washington that SRQ is known to be from, coupled with the ramped-up following of DocOfSoc for trademark "rewrites", make both myself and DocOfSoc convinced that there is little actual coincidence here. ] ] 13:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
| ---- | |||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Revision as of 13:04, 8 January 2012
SkagitRiverQueen
SkagitRiverQueen (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SkagitRiverQueen/Archive.
– This SPI case is open.
08 January 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Lhb1239 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
After a recent failed edit warring report against SRQ's favorite harassment target DocOfSoc (talk · contribs), it was demonstrated that this account has followed this editor to four different articles: Vesta Williams, Montebello, California, Bruce Vilanch and Ovarian cancer (on the last one for a one-off edit made simply to revert an EL that DocOfSoc had been trying to include). This editor's signature is a direct copy of that of Bwilkins (talk · contribs), and when they were reminded of this they rebuked Bwilkins (an admin at least formerly respected by SRQ as far as admins go) with chillingly familiar language for many that are familiar with SRQ. The fact that their first edits, and most recently created article (KSVU) center around the exact same area of the state of Washington that SRQ is known to be from, coupled with the ramped-up following of DocOfSoc for trademark "rewrites", make both myself and DocOfSoc convinced that there is little actual coincidence here. Doc talk 13:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: