Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/L0de Radio Hour (second nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:39, 27 January 2006 view sourceFemmina (talk | contribs)818 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:46, 27 January 2006 view source Dj28 (talk | contribs)28 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''' as unverifiable. &mdash; ''''']'' <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>''' <small>18:00, Jan. 27, 2006</small> *'''Delete''' as unverifiable. &mdash; ''''']'' <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>''' <small>18:00, Jan. 27, 2006</small>
*'''Merge''' - with ]. l0de was forced to stop producing the show for some time due to a set of ] and no, this is not a joke. We all knew in advance that someone would have nominated this page and so I declare your attempt at trolling us a failure. -- ] 18:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Merge''' - with ]. l0de was forced to stop producing the show for some time due to a set of ] and no, this is not a joke. We all knew in advance that someone would have nominated this page and so I declare your attempt at trolling us a failure. -- ] 18:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
:Merge? LRH has nothing to do with ]. Why should it be merged? --] 18:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:46, 27 January 2006

l0de Radio Hour

Less notable than your average blog. Also unverifiable, on cursory inspection. Most likely just an attempt at trolling.

<snip>:
  • Comment censorship is wrong. <l0de> "Remove this article from your laughable excuse for a website or I will kill you all, and your families. And yes, this is a sincere death threat, you fucking faggots." <l0de> Love, <l0de> l0de.
Merge? LRH has nothing to do with our organization. Why should it be merged? --dj28 18:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)