| Revision as of 04:13, 30 June 2010 edit58.96.106.16 (talk) →Reversion of "vandalism"← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:18, 30 June 2010 edit undoDoc James (talk | contribs)Administrators312,276 edits →Reversion of "vandalism"Next edit → | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
| And to remain 'consistent' you should really remove it from the neuroleptic malignant syndrome page as well. ] (]) 04:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | And to remain 'consistent' you should really remove it from the neuroleptic malignant syndrome page as well. ] (]) 04:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::Yes we do not use case reports. Review articles are preferred. All the best. ] (] · ] · ]) 04:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:18, 30 June 2010
 | Doc James is away on vacation and may not respond swiftly to queries. |  |
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Doc_James. |
Welcome to my Talk Page. Please use the box above, or manually enter new messages at the end of my page.
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- In the news: Misplaced Pages better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Good news
A couple of good things happened today: A minor edit here reminded me of an article I created in 2008.
Елисеева is Russian for Elisséeff; and it caused me to remember writing about Serge Elisséeff at Harvard. It will take time for me to figure out how to explain why this seemed helpful.
A more immediate consequence was the opportunity to enjoy effective collaboration. I worked with In ictu oculi in improving the text of William George Aston and Kim Chae-guk. This was a very small illustration of what I hope to encounter whenever I log on to Misplaced Pages. Good news is good to share.
FYI: you may be interested in a stub article I created about John P. Merrill, the "father of nephrology" --Tenmei (talk) 21:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Sepsis
As an aside, I nearly died because my treating physician insisted that I be treated for a different category of shock. On the topic of MODS, 1992 is an utterly reptilian date. But the citiation was not removed because it was from 1992. It was removed because the statement for which it was cited no longer exists as recognized fact. When a statement is categorically incorrect, as you surely know that it is, it cannot be added to. Because it constitutes a form of vandalism It must be wholely expunged. Consequently there is nowhere left for a new citation to be placed. QuintBy : Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quintby (talk • contribs) 08:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- You need a ref saying that this is no longer the case. Uptodate still uses the 1992 definition. I have not seen a newer one. I am not sure were the questions regarding vandalism comes from. I do not think it applies in this case. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Important Safety Information for Cervarix released under Creative Commons and GNU Free Documentation License
Hello DocJames. Following up on our last discussion, I wanted to let you know that the Important Safety Information for Cervarix that I posted to the Cervarix Talk page has been released "under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)". This is documented on the Cervarix Talk page. Thank you for your input on this! Maitri Shah, PharmD, GSK (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Misplaced Pages controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Reversion of "vandalism"
That was not vandalism. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome can cause pharyngitis, in fact it even says that on the NMS page. Please read a textbook before you revert my edits in the future, and don't patronise me again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.106.16 (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
You have no right to remove it, you are allowed to add "citation needed", for which I am about to provide one. This is going against policy, you can't just remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.106.16 (talk) 04:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
And seriously, don't you have better things to do on your 'holiday'. Lets go on holiday and edit wikipedia! For that matter, do you bring your "textbooks" on holiday with you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.106.16 (talk) 04:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- If you read Misplaced Pages:Verifiability if says "Anything that requires but lacks a source may be removed". I enjoy editing Misplaced Pages and have electronic access to my Universities entire collection. :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
The point is that it can be a good indicator of NMS, because pharyngitis is caused by many antipsychotics. As such, the presence of pharyngitis is a good indicator that the problem may actually be NMS, which is often misdiagnosed. I'm reading this out of my Australian Doctor "How to Treat Yearbook 2005"58.96.106.16 (talk) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I can't be bothered going to the effort of citing this because I have better things to do, so I hope that you feel happy that you have deprived wikipedia readers of useful knowledge. Read the second case report on this link http://www.druglib.com/adverse-reactions_side-effects/abilify/seriousness_hospitalization/reaction_neuroleptic_malignant_syndrome/. Enjoy your holiday. 58.96.106.16 (talk) 04:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
And to remain 'consistent' you should really remove it from the neuroleptic malignant syndrome page as well. 58.96.106.16 (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes we do not use case reports. Review articles are preferred. All the best. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)