Misplaced Pages

Talk:Origins of Burmese Indians: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:09, 2 July 2010 editE. Ripley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,604 edits →Edit: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 07:05, 15 August 2010 edit undoDarz kkg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,623 edits →Edit: Merger again after dividing ?Next edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


I've severely cut the article because much of it was discussing the characteristics of each ethnic group, rather than their origins. Most of these categories actually have very little information about how they arrived in Burma, beyond a passing reference to the British colonial rule. If someone has more or better information please do add it. &mdash; ]\<sup>]</sup> 16:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC) I've severely cut the article because much of it was discussing the characteristics of each ethnic group, rather than their origins. Most of these categories actually have very little information about how they arrived in Burma, beyond a passing reference to the British colonial rule. If someone has more or better information please do add it. &mdash; ]\<sup>]</sup> 16:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

==Merger again after dividing ?==

Are some of the editors simply playing shuffling games?
At first my '''Burmese Indian''' article is cut off and made into numerous sub articles. The person who done that dividing even never acknowledge about this and my contribution edit history was lost in action. People could think that the person who started the new article had contributed all but almost 100% of this article and others e.g. '''Indians in Burmese History''' are my contributions.
He had done in good intension but my contribution history is lost in the process.
Now want to merger again?
Be careful, '''Burmese Indian''' is already regarded as a '''good article''' and you could ruin in the process.
] (]) 07:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:05, 15 August 2010

WikiProject iconEthnic groups NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

WikiProject iconHuman Genetic History (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Edit

I've severely cut the article because much of it was discussing the characteristics of each ethnic group, rather than their origins. Most of these categories actually have very little information about how they arrived in Burma, beyond a passing reference to the British colonial rule. If someone has more or better information please do add it. — e. ripley\ 16:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Merger again after dividing ?

Are some of the editors simply playing shuffling games? At first my Burmese Indian article is cut off and made into numerous sub articles. The person who done that dividing even never acknowledge about this and my contribution edit history was lost in action. People could think that the person who started the new article had contributed all but almost 100% of this article and others e.g. Indians in Burmese History are my contributions. He had done in good intension but my contribution history is lost in the process. Now want to merger again? Be careful, Burmese Indian is already regarded as a good article and you could ruin in the process. Darz kkg (talk) 07:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories: