Revision as of 22:11, 15 July 2010 editYobot (talk | contribs)Bots4,733,870 editsm clean up using AWB (6839)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:25, 12 January 2011 edit undoMdd (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users54,571 edits →FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Sys rating |class=Start |importance=mid |field=Software engineering }} | {{Sys rating |class=Start |importance=mid |field=Software engineering }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
== ] == | |||
I have just made to the ] article and instead added a notification that the framework is outdated. Misplaced Pages is no extension of the FDIC and all info given doesn't have to be the state of the art. | |||
Maybe we should have a better look at the article, and see what has to be done. By I guess the editor was under the impression he could remove everything he whated, based on the argument that the work is out of date. But this argument doesn't really count that much. The information can still have some historical importance. | |||
I hope we can find a way to satisfy both our needs here. But this can that some time. -- ] (]) 02:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:25, 12 January 2011
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework
I have just undone all recent edits made to the FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework article and instead added a notification that the framework is outdated. Misplaced Pages is no extension of the FDIC and all info given doesn't have to be the state of the art.
Maybe we should have a better look at the article, and see what has to be done. By I guess the editor was under the impression he could remove everything he whated, based on the argument that the work is out of date. But this argument doesn't really count that much. The information can still have some historical importance.
I hope we can find a way to satisfy both our needs here. But this can that some time. -- Mdd (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Categories: