| Revision as of 00:56, 19 July 2010 editMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,084 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: Userfied page moved to WP:INCUBATOR← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:59, 19 July 2010 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,084 edits Going ahead and sending it to the CUs.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SPI case status}} | {{SPI case status|endorse}} | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
| {{admin-note}} I have moved ] to the ] at ] as I think that page is just going to sit there in userspace in the case I do suspect socking. That being said, it is possible that meatpuppetry is going on. –] 00:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | {{admin-note}} I have moved ] to the ] at ] as I think that page is just going to sit there in userspace in the case I do suspect socking. That being said, it is possible that meatpuppetry is going on. –] 00:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Self-endorsing for CheckUser attention as I agree with Betacommand in the possibility this may not be socking. –] 00:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 00:59, 19 July 2010
– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.
Dmurawski
Dmurawski (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dmurawski/Archive.
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
25 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- 66.41.49.195 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bracelett (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Iongatherer (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Memphisto
User:66.41.49.195 is a one trick pony. Subsequent creation of User:Bracelett following semi-protection of article Derek Murawski, and if it wasn't obvious enough, this: User talk:Memphisto#Wow.
User:Dmurawski has said that he is Derek Murawski, and along with his other suspected sock puppets User:Jorotayahbl and User:71.193.87.216 has created his vanity article on three occasions - Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/DMurawski (deleted May 2008) and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Derek Murawski twice (deleted December 2009 and June 2010).
Another one trick pony, User:Iongatherer has an older version of the article in his sandbox User:Iongatherer/Derek Murawski. Memphisto (talk) 23:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Template:Usercompare I would almost consider this a WP:DUCK but would prefer to have a CU confirm/deny it before requesting blocks. β 05:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- It is shame that the UserCompare tool does not show the edits to the deleted articles Derek Murawski, DMurawski and Red Rover (feat. Rap Barbie). It might also be a good idea to WP:SALT the Derek Murawski article. Memphisto (talk) 13:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- I cant publicly release that data due to privacy issues and toolserver rules. β 13:41, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Administrator note I have moved User:Iongatherer/Derek Murawski to the article incubator at Misplaced Pages:Article incubator/Derek Murawski as I think that page is just going to sit there in userspace in the case I do suspect socking. That being said, it is possible that meatpuppetry is going on. –MuZemike 00:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Self-endorsing for CheckUser attention as I agree with Betacommand in the possibility this may not be socking. –MuZemike 00:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Categories: