Misplaced Pages

User talk:Matthead: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:02, 28 July 2010 editMatthead (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits hey← Previous edit Revision as of 06:04, 29 July 2010 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,206 edits You have been blocked from editing in enforcement of an arbitration decision. (TW)Next edit →
Line 34: Line 34:
: BTW: any Misplaced Pages edit window has a "Wiki markup" section that can be used with a mouse or touchpad or whatever moves the pointer/cursor. While this remark by Radek is not as talkative as , it is about as friendly. : BTW: any Misplaced Pages edit window has a "Wiki markup" section that can be used with a mouse or touchpad or whatever moves the pointer/cursor. While this remark by Radek is not as talkative as , it is about as friendly.
: So yet another AE drama? Well, AE requires that a ''"request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below"''. was judged by an admin. Also, the big colorful box at the top of the page states ''"Please be aware that as a user requesting arbitration enforcement, it is your responsibility to supply all information required for administrators to determine whether enforcement is required, as described in the instructions. Your request may otherwise be declined without further action"''. Thus, I'm convinced that a neutral admin will decline it without further ado. -- ] ]  21:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) : So yet another AE drama? Well, AE requires that a ''"request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below"''. was judged by an admin. Also, the big colorful box at the top of the page states ''"Please be aware that as a user requesting arbitration enforcement, it is your responsibility to supply all information required for administrators to determine whether enforcement is required, as described in the instructions. Your request may otherwise be declined without further action"''. Thus, I'm convinced that a neutral admin will decline it without further ado. -- ] ]  21:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== July 2010 ==
<div class="user-block"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' for a period of '''1 week''' from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 06:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->

Revision as of 06:04, 29 July 2010


Archives

User talk:Matthead/Archive2006
User talk:Matthead/Archive2007
User talk:Matthead/Archive2008
User talk:Matthead/Archive2009
User talk:Matthead/Archive2010



This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Did you know & Signpost

The Signpost
24 December 2024
FoodPharmerFoodPharmer


AE report

I have mentioned you in a reply to an AE request made by Loosmark. Varsovian (talk) 11:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

AE is so boooring. -- Matthead  Discuß   20:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to England and Germany football rivalry, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TFOWR 14:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but as I edits since 2004, it is a little belated. -- Matthead  Discuß   20:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Normdaten

Template:Normdaten has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 00:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

One wonders why some are so highly motivated to get useful templates deleted. -- Matthead  Discuß   20:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

hey

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Matthead (sorry this keyboard doesnt have brackets on it). Radek (or tildas) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radeksz (talkcontribs) 21:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

BTW: any Misplaced Pages edit window has a "Wiki markup" section that can be used with a mouse or touchpad or whatever moves the pointer/cursor. While this remark by Radek is not as talkative as the last one, it is about as friendly.
So yet another AE drama? Well, AE requires that a "request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below". This AE entry by Radek was judged severely malformed by an admin. Also, the big colorful box at the top of the page states "Please be aware that as a user requesting arbitration enforcement, it is your responsibility to supply all information required for administrators to determine whether enforcement is required, as described in the instructions. Your request may otherwise be declined without further action". Thus, I'm convinced that a neutral admin will decline it without further ado. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block.  Sandstein  06:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."