Revision as of 13:32, 4 August 2010 editYobot (talk | contribs)Bots4,733,870 editsm Person of 2nd century. Tagging as dead, (Plugin++), replaced: {{Classical Greece and Rome| → {{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|, {{WPGR| → {{WikiProject Greece| using AWB (6951)← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:49, 16 September 2012 edit undoYobot (talk | contribs)Bots4,733,870 editsm WPBIO banner fixes + cleanup (Task: 17) using AWB (8413)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WPBiography | |||
{{WikiProject Biography | |||
|living=no | |living=no | ||
|class=start | |class=start | ||
|listas=Pausanias | |listas=Pausanias | ||
|priority= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=start|importance=low}} | {{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=start|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Greece|class=start|importance=}} | {{WikiProject Greece|class=start|importance=}} | ||
}} | |||
==Untitled== | ==Untitled== |
Revision as of 05:49, 16 September 2012
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
- spam removed*
Andrew Stewart, One Hundred Greek Sculptors
I can't find any bibliographical details about this book. I take it this is the living Andrew Stewart who's written on Greek sculpture, not someone quoted by the 1911 Britannica? I can't track down date, publisher, or ISBN. The text of the book is given on the Perseus site but that doesn't have any details either; it does have an ISBN, but it's for the wrong book. Petrouchka 00:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Re.: Andrew Steward: In any case, that citation, and all that goes with it should probably be removed.
Generally, the whole article is full of very oldfashioned thinking about Pausanias. Check out Hutton's and Pretzler's books, and the Alcock/Cherry/Elsner edited volume (as in the bibliography). Habicht (1985) is simply outdated now, and the article pretty much summarises what he and older writers say.
Pausanias' language is no longer seen as clumsy, a number of references have turned up in recent years (so we have to assume that he was in fact read).
The question is whether this should get a pretty thorough re-write... a lot of this is simply judgemental in a very oldfashioned (and now thoroughly outdated) way - all taken from sources which are simply too old, it seems. Megalopolitan (talk) 23:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- Start-Class Greek articles
- Unknown-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages