Revision as of 07:59, 8 August 2010 editElmor (talk | contribs)287 edits →Requested move: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:59, 14 August 2010 edit undoPhoenix7777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,531 edits →Requested move: support +1Next edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
] → {{noredirect|1=Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty}} — The name "Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty" is used more often ( vs ) and, IMHO, it is also much more understandable for non-Korean people. ] (]) 07:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | ] → {{noredirect|1=Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty}} — The name "Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty" is used more often ( vs ) and, IMHO, it is also much more understandable for non-Korean people. ] (]) 07:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:'''support''' per above. ―― ] (]) 12:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:59, 14 August 2010
Korea Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Japan Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905 be renamed and moved to Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
Eulsa Treaty → Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty — The name "Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty" is used more often ( vs ) and, IMHO, it is also much more understandable for non-Korean people. Elmor (talk) 07:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- support per above. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)