Misplaced Pages

Talk:Origins of Burmese Indians: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:05, 15 August 2010 editDarz kkg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,623 edits Edit: Merger again after dividing ?← Previous edit Revision as of 18:42, 13 February 2012 edit undoDthomsen8 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers498,600 edits Removed {{WikiProject HGH}} {{GOCEreviewed}} on this redirect talk page.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Ethnic groups}} {{Ethnic groups|class=redirect|importance=NA}}
{{WikiProject HGH}}
{{GOCEreviewed}}


== Edit == == Edit ==

Revision as of 18:42, 13 February 2012

WikiProject iconEthnic groups NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Edit

I've severely cut the article because much of it was discussing the characteristics of each ethnic group, rather than their origins. Most of these categories actually have very little information about how they arrived in Burma, beyond a passing reference to the British colonial rule. If someone has more or better information please do add it. — e. ripley\ 16:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Merger again after dividing ?

Are some of the editors simply playing shuffling games? At first my Burmese Indian article is cut off and made into numerous sub articles. The person who done that dividing even never acknowledge about this and my contribution edit history was lost in action. People could think that the person who started the new article had contributed all but almost 100% of this article and others e.g. Indians in Burmese History are my contributions. He had done in good intension but my contribution history is lost in the process. Now want to merger again? Be careful, Burmese Indian is already regarded as a good article and you could ruin in the process. Darz kkg (talk) 07:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories: