Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:17, 24 August 2010 editPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,360 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: comment← Previous edit Revision as of 20:29, 24 August 2010 edit undoCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: reNext edit →
Line 61: Line 61:
***'''Note:''' The behavior and modus operandi of the above-checked-accounts, combined with , shows a pattern similar to that from the ] evidence, namely, ] and ]. -- ''']''' (]) 04:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC) ***'''Note:''' The behavior and modus operandi of the above-checked-accounts, combined with , shows a pattern similar to that from the ] evidence, namely, ] and ]. -- ''']''' (]) 04:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
****Regarding AlexJohnTorres12/JessaRinaldi, this is certainly against the spirit of ], so one the accounts should be blocked. Given the JessaRinaldi is no longer active, I've blocked indefinitely. Whether the AlexJohnTorres12 account should be blocked under ] is more borderline, so I haven't blocked, however obviously a report could be filed at ]. In respect to the other case, I've blocked indefinitely MrSimmonds, again because the account is against the spirit of ]. However, I haven't blocked the Mike Greenwood account, which has yet to edit, nor Monsignore, which doesn't focus on Scientology. Again, if Jimgreensboro is infringing ], then I'd suggest filing a report at ]. ] (]) 20:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC) ****Regarding AlexJohnTorres12/JessaRinaldi, this is certainly against the spirit of ], so one the accounts should be blocked. Given the JessaRinaldi is no longer active, I've blocked indefinitely. Whether the AlexJohnTorres12 account should be blocked under ] is more borderline, so I haven't blocked, however obviously a report could be filed at ]. In respect to the other case, I've blocked indefinitely MrSimmonds, again because the account is against the spirit of ]. However, I haven't blocked the Mike Greenwood account, which has yet to edit, nor Monsignore, which doesn't focus on Scientology. Again, if Jimgreensboro is infringing ], then I'd suggest filing a report at ]. ] (]) 20:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
*****As the checkuser resulted in {{confirmed}} for groups as being ''the same user'', should not those all be blocked for block evasion and abusing multiple accounts? Not sure why any of the socks should remain unblocked. -- ''']''' (]) 20:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

---- ----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 20:29, 24 August 2010

Shutterbug

Shutterbug (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug/Archive.


– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.


24 August 2010
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by Cirt

Block evasion. Violation of multiple sections of WP:ARBSCI, notably restrictions on multiple accounts, and restrictions on use of open proxies and disclosure of Church of Scientology-controlled IPs and managed sock accounts.

  1. AlexJohnTorres12 (talk · contribs) -- spam/promo at article on leader of Church of Scientology, example includes,
  2. JessaRinaldi (talk · contribs) -- Blocked for violations of WP:BLP policy, on page on critic of Scientology,
  3. Whoismarty (talk · contribs) -- Blocked for violations of WP:BLP on Scientology critic article page,
  4. Johnalexwood (talk · contribs) -- Prior block for use of non reliable sources on WP:BLP pages within Scientology topic,
  5. Monsignore (talk · contribs) -- Removal of links to subject's website, on article about Scientology critic,
  6. MrSimmonds (talk · contribs) -- Removal of subject's own blog from article about subject, who is a Scientology critic
  7. Jimgreensboro (talk · contribs) -- Additions of primary-sourced-Church of Scientology-material and promotional webpages, to article on Scientology spokesperson
  8. Jbsweden9 (talk · contribs) -- Blocked, for using Misplaced Pages for spam/advertising, removing critical content about Scientology across multiple pages
  9. Fairyday (talk · contribs) -- Page blanking, removal of sourced (critical) content from Scientology article, example,

Most likely that most, if not all, of these accounts, have used forms of technical IP usage which violates WP:ARBSCI. -- Cirt (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Note: If not Shutterbug (talk · contribs), some of these accounts may also be tied with technical data correlations to another sockmaster on Scientology topic, that of banned user DavidYork71 (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 04:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
  •  Confirmed the following as one user:
  1. AlexJohnTorres12 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. JessaRinaldi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Also  Confirmed the following as one user:

  1. MrSimmonds (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Mike Greenwood (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. Monsignore (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Jimgreensboro (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

It appears that these two groups of users are Red X Unrelated. No open proxies as far as I can tell, just a lot of mobile editing, which makes it harder to connect the accounts to each other. The first group of users could be related to Shutterbug based on geolocation of IPs, but again, it's nothing concrete. Fairyday (talk · contribs) appears Red X Unrelated to any of the above users, but could be Shutterbug based on location. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories: