| Revision as of 18:57, 14 September 2010 editPostdlf (talk | contribs)Administrators91,178 edits →Background of the Case← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:19, 12 August 2011 edit undo98.165.151.225 (talk) →Picture: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| 9/14/10 I am in no way a legal scholar, and in fact was only exposed to this decision today in my Law class. Still, I believe the case details on this page are inaccurate. My reading of the footnotes of the opinion has that Cohen had worn the jacket upon entering the building and then removed it when he entered the court room, allowing the police officer to take notice and speak to the judge. My reading of this article has that Cohen did not put on the coat until after he exited the court room, which creates an important distinction in his level of protest. I'm unwilling to change anything, though, as I am in no way an authority. ] (]) 18:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | 9/14/10 I am in no way a legal scholar, and in fact was only exposed to this decision today in my Law class. Still, I believe the case details on this page are inaccurate. My reading of the footnotes of the opinion has that Cohen had worn the jacket upon entering the building and then removed it when he entered the court room, allowing the police officer to take notice and speak to the judge. My reading of this article has that Cohen did not put on the coat until after he exited the court room, which creates an important distinction in his level of protest. I'm unwilling to change anything, though, as I am in no way an authority. ] (]) 18:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :You don't need to be an expert to accurately read a SCOTUS opinion. Could you provide the relevant quote from the opinion, cited to page and footnote? ''']''' ('']'') 18:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | :You don't need to be an expert to accurately read a SCOTUS opinion. Could you provide the relevant quote from the opinion, cited to page and footnote? ''']''' ('']'') 18:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Picture == | |||
| I think this article would benefit from a picture of the jacket. I have personally seen such a picture but I am having a hard time finding it online. Perhaps another editor here would be able to find it. ] (]) 21:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:19, 12 August 2011
 | U.S. Supreme Court cases Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Law Start‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Background of the Case
| This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below. |
9/14/10 I am in no way a legal scholar, and in fact was only exposed to this decision today in my Law class. Still, I believe the case details on this page are inaccurate. My reading of the footnotes of the opinion has that Cohen had worn the jacket upon entering the building and then removed it when he entered the court room, allowing the police officer to take notice and speak to the judge. My reading of this article has that Cohen did not put on the coat until after he exited the court room, which creates an important distinction in his level of protest. I'm unwilling to change anything, though, as I am in no way an authority. Dontwriteplays (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- You don't need to be an expert to accurately read a SCOTUS opinion. Could you provide the relevant quote from the opinion, cited to page and footnote? postdlf (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Picture
I think this article would benefit from a picture of the jacket. I have personally seen such a picture but I am having a hard time finding it online. Perhaps another editor here would be able to find it. 98.165.151.225 (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories: