Revision as of 19:50, 5 October 2010 editStryn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,693 editsm →Two articles: signature← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 5 October 2010 edit undoFriginator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers14,892 edits Oops.Next edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Two articles == | == Two articles == | ||
There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: ] and ] --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: ] and ] --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like ]. From the revision history, it looks like ] and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). ] (]) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:00, 5 October 2010
Notability
The song charted, even before released as a single officially.
http://www.billboard.com/#/song/linkin-park/waiting-for-the-end/22634911
Two articles
There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: Waiting for the End and Waiting for the End (song) --Djlordi 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song). From the revision history, it looks like Kevon100 and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). Friginator (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)