| Revision as of 22:06, 9 February 2006 editPalm dogg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,341 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 22:18, 9 February 2006 edit undoPalm dogg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,341 editsm →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| According to the WikiProphet, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than to write a good ] article on ]. However, I have tried and rewritten the article , so any errors in it are mine and mine alone. It covers a decisive battle fought by ] against his ] opponents in 624, which has an extremely important place in ], roughly equivalent to the Jews' escape from Pharoah in the Torah. The article has had a thorough ''']''', is listed as a Good Article, and has been copy-edited at least once. I hope you will see fit to support this nomination. If not I would very much appreciate detailed responses so I can keep improving this page. ] 22:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | According to the WikiProphet, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than to write a good ] article on ]. However, I have tried and rewritten the article , so any errors in it are mine and mine alone. It covers a decisive battle fought by ] against his ] opponents in 624, which has an extremely important place in ], roughly equivalent to the Jews' escape from Pharoah in the Torah. The article has had a thorough ''']''', is listed as a Good Article, and has been copy-edited at least once. I hope you will see fit to support this nomination. If not I would very much appreciate detailed responses so I can keep improving this page. ] 22:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :*Pre-emptive strike: There are two complaints that I will address before they are made. First, the maps |
:*Pre-emptive strike: There are two complaints that I will address before they are made. First, the maps: I need new ones: though I recieved permission to use the ones displayed, I was not granted a GDFL license. This is not my forte, so anyone who is willing and able should contact me. Second, Amr ibn Hisham... or is it Hashim? Put simply, I don't know and I've found ample evidence for both spellings. ] 22:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 9 February 2006
Battle of Badr
According to the WikiProphet, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than to write a good NPOV article on Islam. However, I have tried and rewritten the article from scratch, so any errors in it are mine and mine alone. It covers a decisive battle fought by Muhammad against his Quraish opponents in 624, which has an extremely important place in Islamic history, roughly equivalent to the Jews' escape from Pharoah in the Torah. The article has had a thorough Peer Review, is listed as a Good Article, and has been copy-edited at least once. I hope you will see fit to support this nomination. If not I would very much appreciate detailed responses so I can keep improving this page. Palm_Dogg 22:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Pre-emptive strike: There are two complaints that I will address before they are made. First, the maps: I need new ones: though I recieved permission to use the ones displayed, I was not granted a GDFL license. This is not my forte, so anyone who is willing and able should contact me. Second, Amr ibn Hisham... or is it Hashim? Put simply, I don't know and I've found ample evidence for both spellings. Palm_Dogg 22:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)