Misplaced Pages

Talk:Al Gore III: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:44, 5 November 2010 editWill Beback (talk | contribs)112,162 edits →Confusing redirect: r← Previous edit Revision as of 07:07, 19 September 2014 edit undoSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors196,956 edits →Protected edit request on 19 September 2014: new sectionNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
] (]) 22:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC) ] (]) 22:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
:I'm not sure why we have this redirect at all, but I've made the sensible change you suggested. &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 23:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC) :I'm not sure why we have this redirect at all, but I've made the sensible change you suggested. &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 23:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 19 September 2014 ==

{{Edit protected}}
Could the following text:

<nowiki>]</nowiki>

...please be replaced with the following text:

{{Tl|R fully protected}}

...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Also, can the section target be changed to ] (the current section redirect doesn't exist), as well as adding an {{Tl|R to section}} category tag? Thanks! ] (]) 07:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:07, 19 September 2014

{{editprotected}} Could someone remove the template of the page? It appears at Category:Misplaced Pages pages with incorrect protection templates Tbhotch 01:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

It didn't seem to be in the category that you mentioned. Anyway I have now moved it to Category:Protected redirects. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Confusing redirect

Reading the deletion discussion, it seems that "Al Gore III" is not the same person as "Albert Arnold "Al" Gore" Jr, 45th Vice President of the United States. Can someone with edit rights change the redirect to Al_Gore_III#Marriage_and_family so that this redirect at least gives a hint to avoid that confusion? Diego Moya (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure why we have this redirect at all, but I've made the sensible change you suggested.   Will Beback  talk  23:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 19 September 2014

It is requested that an edit be made to the fully protected redirect at Al Gore III. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.

Edit requests to fully protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

Could the following text:

]

...please be replaced with the following text:

{{R fully protected}}

...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Also, can the section target be changed to Al Gore#Marriage and family (the current section redirect doesn't exist), as well as adding an {{R to section}} category tag? Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 07:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Category: