| Revision as of 18:14, 15 November 2010 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,451 edits Warning: Removal of maintenance templates on Natural Theology. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:42, 15 November 2010 edit undoKww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits →November 2010Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| == November 2010 == | == November 2010 == | ||
| ] Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered ]. Further edits of this type may result in your being ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> ''Here you appear to have removed substantially more templates than can be justified by the material you inserted. Specifically, you removed a number of citation needed tags without replacing them with inline citations. From prior experience, I know that it can be frustrating to edit with ], in that he has and embraces higher sourcing and citation standards than most other editors. Given that your removal of tags has recently been discussed at ], I regretfully issue you this warning as a Wikifriend who really, really wishes he didn't have to do this: you need to be impeccable in your tag removal.'' ] (]) 18:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ] Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered ]. Further edits of this type may result in your being ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> ''Here you appear to have removed substantially more templates than can be justified by the material you inserted. Specifically, you removed a number of citation needed tags without replacing them with inline citations. From prior experience, I know that it can be frustrating to edit with ], in that he has and embraces higher sourcing and citation standards than most other editors. Given that your removal of tags has recently been discussed at ], I regretfully issue you this warning as a Wikifriend who really, really wishes he didn't have to do this: you need to be impeccable in your tag removal.'' ] (]) 18:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Additionally, closing an AFD as a "speedy keep" when there are editors arguing for deletion is completely inappropriate. You even cited a reason that ''said'' that.—](]) 19:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:42, 15 November 2010
 Archives |
Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Sphilbrick
Thought you might like to see that I changed my vote on this one: You were right, my reasoning made no sense. Thanks for pointing it out. Robofish (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well said. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Natural Theology, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Here you appear to have removed substantially more templates than can be justified by the material you inserted. Specifically, you removed a number of citation needed tags without replacing them with inline citations. From prior experience, I know that it can be frustrating to edit with User:Hrafn, in that he has and embraces higher sourcing and citation standards than most other editors. Given that your removal of tags has recently been discussed at WP:ANI, I regretfully issue you this warning as a Wikifriend who really, really wishes he didn't have to do this: you need to be impeccable in your tag removal. Jclemens (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Additionally, closing an AFD as a "speedy keep" when there are editors arguing for deletion is completely inappropriate. You even cited a reason that said that.—Kww(talk) 19:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)