| Revision as of 21:54, 15 December 2010 edit155.99.230.57 (talk) reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:17, 15 December 2010 edit undo69.22.185.186 (talk) →SavilloNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I can accuse in court , Savillo never wrote this.. why sentence by Savillo????<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | I can accuse in court , Savillo never wrote this.. why sentence by Savillo????<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
| :The sentence I removed had a to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC ] (]) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | :The sentence I removed had a to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC ] (]) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| I don't think so. You did that directly sacrificing someone's name when he doesn't even know that his name is being cited. This still needs to be heard. You have to pay for it. | |||
Revision as of 22:17, 15 December 2010
Savillo
I can accuse in court , Savillo never wrote this.. why sentence by Savillo????— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.31.68.51 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- The sentence I removed had a citation to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC 155.99.230.57 (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't think so. You did that directly sacrificing someone's name when he doesn't even know that his name is being cited. This still needs to be heard. You have to pay for it.