Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:03, 23 December 2010 editMbz1 (talk | contribs)22,338 editsm ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above this...'  Revision as of 18:25, 23 December 2010 edit undoDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits →Comments by other users: tNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


Lol. I didn't do this. Feel free to CU me. All this really is is harassment since Mbz1 can't have her block of me she requested at ANI.— ''']]<sup><big><span class="plainlinks"></span></big> ]</sup>''' 18:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 18:25, 23 December 2010

– This SPI case is open.

Daedalus969

Daedalus969 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969/Archive.


23 December 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

First time I have heard about user:Demiurge1000 (the account was created less than a 6 months ago) was today, when the user has suggested blocking me for absolutely nothing. The the user went canvasing. I run wikistalk on the users. Here's what I got IMO the post on AN/I, requesting blocking me on a more than unwarranted accusation, canvasing and wiki stalk report are enough evidence to run SPI Mbz1 (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Lol. I didn't do this. Feel free to CU me. All this really is is harassment since Mbz1 can't have her block of me she requested at ANI.— Dædαlus 18:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: