| Revision as of 10:48, 22 February 2006 editJuro (talk | contribs)9,151 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:51, 22 February 2006 edit undoJuro (talk | contribs)9,151 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The expression “royal town privileges” characterizes the extensive privileges given to Kremnica by the king better than the words ”town status”. It also distinguishes Kreminca (and other royal towns – future free royal towns) from the towns owned by nobles. ] 11:35 22 Feb 2006 (UTC) | The expression “royal town privileges” characterizes the extensive privileges given to Kremnica by the king better than the words ”town status”. It also distinguishes Kreminca (and other royal towns – future free royal towns) from the towns owned by nobles. ] 11:35 22 Feb 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I know what you intended to write and this is a frequent error, but you just cannot use a legal term for a time, when it did not exist yet |
I know what you intended to write and this is a frequent error, but you just cannot use a legal term for a time, when it did not exist yet neither formally, nor in terms of content. What you mean is a "royal town" then. I will change that.] 10:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Ah, I see you have done that already. ] 10:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:51, 22 February 2006
The expression “royal town privileges” characterizes the extensive privileges given to Kremnica by the king better than the words ”town status”. It also distinguishes Kreminca (and other royal towns – future free royal towns) from the towns owned by nobles. Tankred 11:35 22 Feb 2006 (UTC)
I know what you intended to write and this is a frequent error, but you just cannot use a legal term for a time, when it did not exist yet neither formally, nor in terms of content. What you mean is a "royal town" then. I will change that.Juro 10:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I see you have done that already. Juro 10:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)