| Revision as of 17:41, 11 January 2011 editPrince of Nothing05 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,287 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:09, 12 January 2011 edit undoTuscumbia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled5,626 edits →Thank'sNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| Thank's Xebulon for reverting my edits!Aram-van--] (]) 17:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | Thank's Xebulon for reverting my edits!Aram-van--] (]) 17:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==AN== | |||
| Hello, please see this report ] (]) 19:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:09, 12 January 2011
- )
Lavash
Hello, could you please explain your edit? --Quantum666 (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tuscumbia (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hello. This is your second and final warning for edit warring on Culture of Nagorno-Karabakh. Tuscumbia (talk) 14:29, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Culture of Nagorno-Karabakh
Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the discussions in Talk:Culture of Nagorno-Karabakh. However, I hope you aren't offended by my reminding you to please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Culture of Nagorno-Karabakh is a controversial article with often heated discussions. It's best to closely follow talk page guidelines and keep a cool head even when you think others are not. --Ronz (talk) 16:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
January 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Shusha. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 02:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not lecture me on issues you apparently are not qualified to judge. All sources I ever used are verified and reliable. Thank you. Xebulon (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Xebulon, you're really pushing it towards sanctions. Please stop POV edits and your edit warring. Tuscumbia (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- @Xebulon - Firstly, you were not lectured you were given a standardised template message. Secondly, the notion of verifiability applies to content not to sources. Thirdly, whilst you may be using reliable sources to verify your content you failed to cite it properly using an inline citation. Based on that I suggest it is you that suffers from WP:NOCLUE not I. That is all Pol430 talk to me 19:05, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
ANI notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
New section
Hello, Xebulon. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Thank's
Thank's Xebulon for reverting my edits!Aram-van--Aram-van (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
AN
Hello, please see this report Tuscumbia (talk) 19:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC)